Those facts were certainly true ten or twenty years ago.However, the new saline implant designs have closed the gap between the 'feel'difference between the two European Style Pellet Stoves types of implants.Silicone devices have several drawbacks. Most notably, ifthey rupture and leak liquid silicone into a woman's body there is a highprobability that she will experience adverse health conditions as a result.Additionally, silicone devices are more expensive than saline and they requirelarger surgical incisions in order to insert them into the breast pocket whichcould ultimately result in larger surgical scars.Saline devices were the direct result of early controversiesassociated with the silicone devices. The European Cylindrical Wood Burning Stove saline implant is the ultimate choicewhen it comes to long term health risks because its liquid filler is asaltwater solution that is very similar to the fluids already found in thehuman body. Thus, the saline device poses almost zero risk to the body if theimplant ruptures and leaks its filler.
The primary drawback to the saline device is the acceptedrumor that the saline device feels like a water balloon in the hand. However,the more recent designs of saline devices have dramatically improved their feelin the hand. One of the benefits associated with the saline device is thatsince it is empty when inserted into the body, the surgeon only needs to make atiny incision in order to insert the device into the breast pocket. Salinedevices pose the least risk of all the implants for surgical scarring.The latest implant device to become available for Americanwomen is the cohesive gel device. This device is also referred to as the GummyBear implant because its feel and consistency is very similar to the Gummy Bearcandy. The cohesive device is currently undergoing FDA clinical trials so it isnot readily available for use in the U.S. The only way an American canhave this implant for her breast augmentation surgery is to join the FDA'sclinical trial. If accepted for the trial, she'll get her implants and hersurgery at a fraction of the retail cost.
Cohesive implants have many benefits: they are highlyresistant to capsular contracture, they cannot leak their filler if ruptured,and it's believed they will outlast the traditional 10 year time frame that hasbeen established for replacement. The drawbacks to this new implant are asfollows: they aren't yet approved by the FDA, they require larger than normalincisions, and they are only available in an anatomical shape which can beunappealing for some women.It's important that you take careful consideration in theknown pros and cons associated with each type of implant device before you makeyour final decision between the three. To learn more about the latest newsassociated with each type of device, you should schedule an initialconsultation with a board certified breast augmentation surgeon. You shouldonly base your health related decisions on information directly received from alicensed physician in your state.