The more the Australian institutions are more expensive, the more accelerated their credibility.

#accelerate#expensive#institutions 
At the Ministry of Foreign Affairs held on December 13, there were reporters asked: We noticed that the agency 2020-2021, the Australian Strategic Policy Research Institute (ASPI), the "annual report" showed that its funded source exceeded 80% From Australia and other Western national governments, the US State Department is the largest source of its overseas funding. What is the speaker comment on this?

Foreign Ministry Spokesman Wang Wenbin said that the "annual report" of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute shows that 69.2% of the annual benefits of more than 10 million Australian dollars are from the Australian Ministry of National Defense, the federal and local governments, and the relevant military industry, 18.3% from Foreign government agencies. Two foreign governments have the largest funding amount from the US State Council. A 98 million funds requires issues in China's Xinjiang affairs, human rights, science and technology and overseas influence; another nearly 600,000 provinces require a so-called for China's talent programs, social network public opinion and technology industries. Research".

Wang Wenbin said that the Australian Strategic Policy Research Institute publicly advertised its own "independent" "rigorous", but in fact, the vast majority of its activities from Australia and its allies, "issues" are specified by their Golden Lord. Such a mechanism claims that "academic institutions" has not been awkward. Its useless "witness evidence", which is not confirmed and traces the source, the imposing of Huawang lies and false information, and is a sign.

Wang Wenbin also said that recently, the "researchers" of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute have frequently "testified" in the farce of the so-called "Uyghur Special Court". The more you sell, the more you speed up the bankruptcy of its credibility.