原発の継続の可否は国民投票で！
今回の能登地震では、志賀原発が危うかった。幸いにも運転を休んでいたため事故は起きなかったが、もし稼動していれば大事故に繋がったかも知れない。
いつも思うのだが、地震が起きるたびに原発事故を心配しなければならないというのは如何なものだろうか？
地震も火山も世界で最も多い国に原発を作って何が面白いのだろうか？日本には広大な海と、多くの山が有り水量も豊富なので、自然エネルギーも豊富である。福島原発の事故を教訓に原発を諦めるべきではないのか？
日本国民は政治的主張を控える国民性である事を幸いに、官僚と政治家が重要国策を、民意を問わないで暴走しているように思える。
原発を推進するには、核廃棄物の問題を避けては通れず、原発を放棄する場合には今までの投下資本や努力が無駄になる。何れにしても大きな決断になるので、国民投票で決着をつけるべきであろう。
A referendum will decide whether or not to continue nuclear power plants.
In this Noto earthquake, the Shiga nuclear power plant was in danger. Fortunately, no accident occurred because the power plant was not driving, but if it had been in operation, it could have led to a serious accident.
I always wonder, it is a big problem to have to worry about a nuclear power plant accident every time an earthquake occurs.
What's so funny about building a nuclear power plant in a country with the most earthquakes and volcanoes in the world? Japan has a vast ocean, many mountains, and an abundance of water, so it is also rich in natural energy. Shouldn't we learn from the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident and give up on nuclear power?
Because the Japanese people have the characteristic of refraining from making political statements, it seems that bureaucrats and politicians are running wild with important national policies without considering the will of the people.
In order to promote nuclear power plants, the problem of nuclear waste cannot be avoided, and if nuclear power plants are abandoned, the invested capital and efforts made so far will be wasted. In any case, it will be a big decision, so it should be decided by a national referendum.
