《section 2》Electric weak unification theory
T or anti T is elementary absorbed in the gauge field soon, and N or anti N is not elementary but absorbed soon in the same way. T turns out to be W⁻ as A⁻ in Weinberg = Salam theory, and aiti T turns out to be W⁺ as A⁺ in the same way. But, N or anti N is quite a difficult particle in comparison with others. Even if it is not so, T or N is different from A or B in Weinberg = Salam theory. The former has spin 0 as Nambu = Goldstone particle, the latter has spin 1 as gauge boson. I suppouse T・anti T・N・anti N are semi- or pre- particles in the Universe. At least N or anti N will not exists alone.
If spin and mass both are 0, a particle like that does not exist in the Universe. N or anti N is right so. T or anti T has mass from +1 electric charge, and it's not extremely light. From a story to here they exist in the Universe alone. But it will be elementary absorbed in the gauge field soon, and collapse as W⁻ or W⁺ later.
N or anti N makes some complex structure with the aid of T and anti T pair.
T and anti T pair looks just like a B boson of Weinberg = Salam theory, but it makes nowise different formation. The former has two component parts, the latter is elementary. However, in Weinberg = Salam theory, they explain that A boson is made up two-component system. The formula of them are p and anti q・p and anti p + q and anti q・ｑ and anti p. For my thought spontaneous symmetry breaking has only one component system. That's quite contrary to what I've thought. I want to straighten it with my UFM. I suppose interactive spontaneous breaking in the electromagnetic field will do it perfectly, and in next the strong interaction field too.
I taught the electric line in force at an old school, and I noticed that they did ball symmetry without other electric charges near, but it was destroyed with other one near. I thought that such a common phenomenon was a some kind of symmetry breaking too. In this case, I want to suggest it fitting called an interactive symmetry breaking. Yes, I shall propose it of course. I thought that in the interactive symmetry breaking Nambu = Goldstone particles will appear much with the form of pair of an original particle and the antiparticle. In this case, many T and anti T pairs will appear at the electric field, and they will become photons translated in a gauge field.
Photons and Z bosons are piled up for quantum mechanics and exist, according to Electric weak unification theory. They are made up by a N or anti N and a T and anti T pair, each other perpendicularly, incline Weinberg angle θw.
T or anti T is elementary absorbed in the gauge field soon, and N or anti N is not elementary but absorbed soon in the same way. T turns out to be W⁻ as A⁻ in Weinberg = Salam theory, and aiti T turns out to be W⁺ as A⁺ in the same way. But, N or anti N is quite a difficult particle in comparison with others. Even if it is not so, T or N is different from A or B in Weinberg = Salam theory. The former has spin 0 as Nambu = Goldstone particle, the latter has spin 1 as gauge boson. I suppouse T・anti T・N・anti N are semi- or pre- particles in the Universe. At least N or anti N will not exists alone.
If spin and mass both are 0, a particle like that does not exist in the Universe. N or anti N is right so. T or anti T has mass from +1 electric charge, and it's not extremely light. From a story to here they exist in the Universe alone. But it will be elementary absorbed in the gauge field soon, and collapse as W⁻ or W⁺ later.
N or anti N makes some complex structure with the aid of T and anti T pair.
T and anti T pair looks just like a B boson of Weinberg = Salam theory, but it makes nowise different formation. The former has two component parts, the latter is elementary. However, in Weinberg = Salam theory, they explain that A boson is made up two-component system. The formula of them are p and anti q・p and anti p + q and anti q・ｑ and anti p. For my thought spontaneous symmetry breaking has only one component system. That's quite contrary to what I've thought. I want to straighten it with my UFM. I suppose interactive spontaneous breaking in the electromagnetic field will do it perfectly, and in next the strong interaction field too.
I taught the electric line in force at an old school, and I noticed that they did ball symmetry without other electric charges near, but it was destroyed with other one near. I thought that such a common phenomenon was a some kind of symmetry breaking too. In this case, I want to suggest it fitting called an interactive symmetry breaking. Yes, I shall propose it of course. I thought that in the interactive symmetry breaking Nambu = Goldstone particles will appear much with the form of pair of an original particle and the antiparticle. In this case, many T and anti T pairs will appear at the electric field, and they will become photons translated in a gauge field.
Photons and Z bosons are piled up for quantum mechanics and exist, according to Electric weak unification theory. They are made up by a N or anti N and a T and anti T pair, each other perpendicularly, incline Weinberg angle θw.
アクセス
トータル
ランキング
