これは、どっちが悪いのだろうか？
予防効果のない、うがい薬の使用を呼び掛け、誤解させた大阪府知事が悪いのか、
それを鵜呑みにして、全国で品切れが起きるほど買い占めた人たちが悪いのか、
はたまた、どっちも悪いのか？
記憶に間違いがなければ、風俗に行くと真っ先にイソジンでうがいさせられると、
ラジオで南キャン山里が言っていた。
にも関わらず、風俗に行った人がコロナに感染したという記事があった。
その事実からも、予防効果のないことがわかる。
「感染者の唾液からウイルスの陽性反応が出る頻度が低下したとする研究成果を紹介」
との部分を受けてなのだろうが、検査で陽性の人が陰性と出てしまう可能性を危惧したコメントがある。
だがPCR検査は、鼻から棒を突っ込んで調べるはず。
唾液は関係ないのでは？
Which is wrong with this?
Is it because the governor of Osaka Prefecture, who called for the use of mouthwash without preventive effect and misunderstood it, is bad, or is it bad for the people who swallowed it and bought up enough to sell out all over the country? ?
Minamikan Yamazato said on the radio that if he had no mistakes in his memory, he would be gargled with Isodine first when he went to the customs.
Nonetheless, there was an article that people who went to customs were infected with corona.
The fact also shows that there is no preventive effect.
It may have been received as part of "Introduction of research results that the frequency of positive reaction of virus from infected saliva has decreased", but I feared that people who test positive may be negative. There are comments.
However, the PCR test should be done by sticking a stick through the nose.
Isn't saliva related?