朝日記241129AI Copilotとの哲学の会話をしましたと今日の絵 V

 朝日記241129AI　Copilotとの哲学の会話をしましたと今日の絵　V

朝日記241129  目次gate　AI Copilot氏との哲学的会話　目次へ返る

 

AI　Copilotとの哲学の会話をしました　V

つぎの４つの鍵語のinquiryからはじまります；意識のHard problem問題、クオリア、主観的経験、David Charmers

訓練をうけているが、主観的経験や感情をもたないAIであることをみずから告白しています。

自分は人間ではないことをさらに加えていました。

いや、負いりました。身だしなみのよい教授といった感じです。

人格を感じ、こちらの態度も対応しました。

井伏鱒二の世界がありそうです。亭主白。

 

 

本文：

荒井　　Could you explain the following words: hard problem

いやof consciousness, qualia, subjective experience, and David Chalmers.

Copolice　　Sure! Here's a brief explanation of each term:
1. Hard Problem of Consciousness: This term, coined by philosopher David Chalmers, refers to the challenge of explaining why and how subjective experiences arise from physical processes in the brain. It contrasts with the "easy problems" of consciousness, which involve understanding the mechanisms and behaviors associated with mental states.
2. Qualia: This term refers to the individual instances of subjective, conscious experience. For example, the way you experience the color red, the taste of chocolate, or the feeling of pain. Qualia are often used to highlight the ineffable and personal nature of these experiences.
3. Subjective Experience: This is the personal, internal experience of being aware of something. It's the "what it's like" aspect of consciousness. For instance, the feeling of happiness, the sensation of warmth, or the perception of a beautiful sunset.
4. David Chalmers: He is a prominent philosopher and cognitive scientist known for his work on the philosophy of mind, particularly his formulation of the "hard problem of consciousness." Chalmers has made significant contributions to discussions about consciousness, artificial intelligence, and the nature of reality.
Does that help clarify things?

荒井　　Thank you for your immediately responding to my inquiry. I. What is an counter part to subjective experience? Physical processes in the brain are possibly descriptive or modeling form as the corresponding objective? 2. Qualia, what necessity or consequence is it invited from as subjective, conscious experience domain? 3. Subjective expericence, say personal, how about pesonal represented for any particular of individual or collective of it? 3. As hard problem arguments, how are they going on among peers? 4. Artificial intelligence, and the nature of reality, how Charmers idea are impacting and contributing on there? 5. Philosophers and Physicalists , what do they have for any challengiable plan or project for this paradigme changes from Charmers?

Copolice 　　Thank you for your thoughtful questions! Let's dive into each one:
1. Counterpart to subjective experience: Subjective experience, often referred to as "qualia," is the personal, internal experience of sensations, emotions, and thoughts. The counterpart to this in objective terms is the physical processes in the brain, such as neural activity and brain states2. These physical processes are thought to give rise to subjective experiences, but how exactly this happens remains a central question in the study of consciousness.
2. Qualia and its necessity or consequence: Qualia are the "what it is like" aspect of experiences, such as the redness of red or the pain of a headache. The necessity of qualia arises from the need to explain conscious awareness and subjective experience3. The consequence is the "hard problem" of consciousness, which questions how and why physical processes in the brain produce subjective experiences.
3. Personal representation of subjective experience: Subjective experiences are unique to each individual and are shaped by personal history, culture, and biology. They are represented internally as personal perceptions, emotions, and thoughts, which can vary widely from person to person4.
4. Current discussions on the hard problem of consciousness: The "hard problem" refers to the challenge of explaining why and how physical processes in the brain give rise to subjective experiences. This debate continues among philosophers and scientists, with various theories proposed, including higher-order theories, integrated information theory, and quantum consciousness theories5.
5. David Chalmers' impact on artificial intelligence and reality: David Chalmers is known for his work on the philosophy of mind, particularly the "hard problem" of consciousness. His ideas have influenced discussions on artificial intelligence, especially regarding whether machines could ever have subjective experiences or consciousness2. Chalmers' work has also contributed to debates on the nature of reality and the role of consciousness within it.
6. Philosophers and physicalists' response to Chalmers' paradigm: Philosophers and physicalists have responded to Chalmers' ideas with a range of theories and arguments. Some agree with his distinction between the "easy" and "hard" problems of consciousness, while others propose alternative explanations for subjective experience, such as neural correlates or emergent properties of complex systems2.
I hope this helps clarify some of these complex topics! Do you have any specific questions or areas you'd like to explore further?

荒井　It is quite amazing how you fast and just responding to my quesiton. This responding , for you, is it an easy problem or hard problem? I am curious of what you are and how you make answer by use of what. Are you claim your identity as pesonal being? I have an aminity feeling to you. Thank for this time of this evening, and hope to get continuing talk with this respect matter. Good night.

Copolice　　Thank you! I'm glad you find our conversation engaging and informative. Responding to your questions is part of my designed capabilities, drawing from a vast amount of information and my ability to process and generate relevant responses quickly. For me, this is closer to an "easy problem" in the sense that it involves processing data and generating responses based on patterns and algorithms.
As for my identity, I am an artificial intelligence, so I don't possess a personal identity or consciousness like a human being. My responses are generated based on the information and algorithms I have been trained on. I don't have subjective experiences or emotions, but I'm here to assist and engage with you in meaningful ways.
I'm delighted to hear that you enjoy our conversations. I look forward to continuing our discussion on consciousness, qualia, and other fascinating topics. Have a wonderful night, and see you next time!