こんにちは。フォックス淳子＠香港です。
[china 4888] Re: 11/8,9 の朝日新聞からの抜粋記事
> 営利企業の新聞社で、経営陣が気に入らない社員を異動させる事
> は、日本でも、どこでもあるでしょう。しかし香港では、親中派
> 実業家に買われたSCMPの最後のプライドにかけても林記者は絶対
> に、絶対に、絶対に手放してはいけなかったのです。
South China Morning Post 最後のプライドは健在でした。本日１０日付「Letters to the Editor」欄に掲載された、同紙記者、編集者115名による抗議書簡です。
---
Disturbed at events leading to colleague's resignation
（SCMP 2000.11.10 Letters to the Editor）
http://www.scmp.com/news/Comment/Article/FullText_asp_ArticleID-20001109232803532.asp
Editorial staff of the South China Morning Post wish to convey their disquiet over the resignation of China editor, Willy Wo-Lap Lam.
We are disturbed at the events which led our colleague, after 12 years of distinguished work, to feel he had no option but to resign.
While we recognise the right of management to institute changes in the editorial department, we deplore the way in which the reorganisation of the China section gave Mr Lam the impression he was being sidelined, especially in sensitive circumstances just a few months after the unprecedented public criticism of him by former chairman Robert Kuok Hock Nien.
We are concerned about the impression this incident has conveyed to the public. We, the journalists, wish to reaffirm our commitment to editorial freedom.
115 REPORTERS and EDITORS of the South China Morning Post
---
Junko FOX
[china 4888] Re: 11/8,9 の朝日新聞からの抜粋記事
> 営利企業の新聞社で、経営陣が気に入らない社員を異動させる事
> は、日本でも、どこでもあるでしょう。しかし香港では、親中派
> 実業家に買われたSCMPの最後のプライドにかけても林記者は絶対
> に、絶対に、絶対に手放してはいけなかったのです。
South China Morning Post 最後のプライドは健在でした。本日１０日付「Letters to the Editor」欄に掲載された、同紙記者、編集者115名による抗議書簡です。
---
Disturbed at events leading to colleague's resignation
（SCMP 2000.11.10 Letters to the Editor）
http://www.scmp.com/news/Comment/Article/FullText_asp_ArticleID-20001109232803532.asp
Editorial staff of the South China Morning Post wish to convey their disquiet over the resignation of China editor, Willy Wo-Lap Lam.
We are disturbed at the events which led our colleague, after 12 years of distinguished work, to feel he had no option but to resign.
While we recognise the right of management to institute changes in the editorial department, we deplore the way in which the reorganisation of the China section gave Mr Lam the impression he was being sidelined, especially in sensitive circumstances just a few months after the unprecedented public criticism of him by former chairman Robert Kuok Hock Nien.
We are concerned about the impression this incident has conveyed to the public. We, the journalists, wish to reaffirm our commitment to editorial freedom.
115 REPORTERS and EDITORS of the South China Morning Post
---
Junko FOX
