To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-4-14: Weekday edition,
By March 28, it was reported that US President Trump had "warned major au-tomakers not to raise sales prices due to the tariff hike." Trump is seriously trying to protect the American people!
Has President Trump not asked his "staff" what "factory site" they will "return to"? Mr. Musk should let his "staff" work before "firing" them!
What they are worried about is where the "factory" will be relocated. It's the same "reason" as when they "considered relocating their factory from China to the US." Don't worry! Trump is currently "coordinating" with the relevant parties!
Not only overseas manufacturers such as Japanese and European manufacturers, but also the three major US automakers, including General Motors, which import car bodies and parts from Mexico and Canada, are concerned about a major blow. Be-lieve in Trump!
US automakers with factories in Canada and Mexico are struggling to relocate their factories in the US. There is no way that "US workers' wages" will become "Mexi-can workers' wages." Of course!
What they are saying is, "Don't lump together American automakers that produce in Canada and Mexico with Japanese and German automakers." Don't say that!
They are in trouble because they can't do that. The answer is simple. White House officials should explain "my proposal" to President Trump. "Utilize" "Trump's wall."
"European and Japanese automakers" are also struggling to "relocate their factories in the United States." After all, "American auto workers" have higher wages than "Canadian and Mexican auto workers."
Automakers that produce cars in US factories also import auto parts from parts fac-tories in Canada and Mexico. So they can't easily withdraw from Canada or Mexico.
It is unlikely that American automakers will return their factories to Detroit. A local executive of the United Auto Workers expressed his anxiety, saying, "It's scary be-cause we don't know what will happen." From a Democratic administration!
Stellantis, an automaker that owns brands such as Chrysler in the United States, announced on the 3rd that it would lay off 900 people at five factories in Mexico and Canada and suspend operations at one assembly plant each in response to the an-nouncement of the tariff measures.
President Trump should utilize the "wall on the Mexican border" that he built and provide automakers with "factory sites" in the walled "special zones on the Mexican border."
To that end, the Trump administration should accept illegal immigrants from Central and South America as "temporary immigrants" only in the "special zones on the Mexican border." They will go through the appropriate entry procedures at the Im-migration Bureau.
To reiterate, temporary immigrants' residence is limited to "special zones." They are not allowed to leave the "special zones" and enter areas where Americans live. That's why Americans can feel safe.
"Temporary immigrants" have "lower wages" than "Mexican workers, etc." Howev-er, "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education" are free. Therefore, it can be said that "temporary immigrants" are wealthier than "low-income earners" in the United States.
For details, please refer to past articles such as "Part 3". The automobile industry is not the only one to move into the "Special Zone". Companies that have relocated their factories to China and other places will also return to the "Special Zone". Good luck, Mr. Trump!
Part 1 Citations and References
Trump tells automakers that price increases due to tariffs are "undesirable".
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250329/k00/00m/020/065000c
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/