Are Trump tariffs better than EV enforcement? - The real thoughts of US car dealers

To everyone in the world's media　


I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.


2025-02-28: Weekday Edition,
"Ford CEO" claimed that Trump tariffs would have a "devastating impact" on the auto industry, but US car dealers say "Trump tariffs" are "a little better" than Biden's "EV mandate".

US dealers welcome President Trump. In a survey of car dealers conducted by AN from January 2 to 16, 2025, 64% of dealers said that President Trump's inaugura-tion would have a positive impact on their business.

Only a minority (17%) said that it would have a negative impact. Regarding the 25% tariff on "imports from Canada and Mexico", 70% of respondents said that it would have a "negative impact" or "very negative impact".

However, even taking that into account, Trump "seems to be reassuring consumers with his pro-business attitude" (Cadillac dealer in New Jersey)

In response to the question "Are consumers interested in EVs?", 65% answered "I'm not interested and I won't buy one."

This is significantly higher than the 15% who were "interested and purchased" and the 20% who were "interested but did not purchase."

This reflects the current situation where the growth rate of EV sales (1.3 million units) in 2024 slowed to +7.3% compared to 2023, and the share remains at 8.1%.

From these survey data, it seems that President Trump has decided to impose a 25% tariff on all imported cars.

I think President Trump's 25% tariff is important in the sense that it will bring American car production back to the United States. The factories will return to the "special zone on the Mexican border."

"Illegal immigrants" are flocking to the Mexican border. If they are not "deported" and are employed as "low-wage workers" in factories in the "special zone," they can be "employed" at lower wages than in Mexico.

I think this is a "good condition" for automobile companies as well. Since "tempo-rary immigrants" are limited to living in the "special zone," there is no need to wor-ry about "crime, etc."

It will take time for the factories in the special zone to operate. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. in the United States should be given special permission to manufacture and sell "Japanese-standard 660cc minicars" for "low-income car users."

President Trump mentioned Nissan (cars) many times at the recent press confer-ence with Prime Minister Ishiba, so I thought he might meet with Nissan about the minicar issue.

Due to inflation caused by the Biden administration, the selling price of cars is rising. And I think that the price of cars will rise even more with this "tariff." I think that ordinary people will be satisfied with "minicars" that consume less gasoline and have a low vehicle price.

Imports as (classic cars) should be left as they are. Imports of minicars (new cars) should be banned, and Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. should be allowed to produce "minicars" in the United States. And exports to Latin America should also be al-lowed.

Part 1 Citations and References
Is the Trump tariff better than forcing EVs? - The real thoughts of a US car dealer
https://smart-mobility.jp/_ct/17748142

I will write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any que

トランプ関税はEVの強制よりマシ？ - 米自動車ディーラーの本音 「フォードのCEO」はトランプ関税が自動車業界に「

世界のメディアの「皆様」　へ　


私は不足する資料は提供いたしますのでメールで請求をしてください。


2025-02-28: 平日版、
「フォードのCEO」はトランプ関税が自動車業界に「壊滅的な影響」を与えると主張したが、米国の自動車ディーラーは「トランプ関税」はバイデンの「EV強制」より「少しマシ」と述べている。

米国のディーラーはトランプ大統領を歓迎している。2025年1月2日から16日まで行われたANの自動車ディーラーへの調査では、ディーラーの64％がトランプ大統領の就任はビジネスに良い影響を与えると答えた。

マイナスの影響を与えると答えたのは少数派（17％）にとどまった。「カナダとメキシコからの輸入品」への25％の関税については、回答者の70％が「マイナスの影響」または「非常にマイナスの影響」を与えると答えた。

しかし、それを考慮しても、トランプは「ビジネス志向の姿勢で消費者に安心感を与えているようだ」（ニュージャージー州のキャデラックディーラー）

「消費者はEVに興味があるか？」という質問に対して、65％が「興味がなく、購入しない」と回答した。

これは、「興味があり購入した」15％、「興味はあるが購入していない」20％を大きく上回る。

これは、2024年のEV販売台数（130万台）の伸び率が2023年比で＋7.3％に鈍化し、シェアも8.1％にとどまっている現状を反映しているという。

これらの調査データから、トランプ大統領は輸入車すべてに25％の関税を課すことを決定したようだ。

トランプ大統領の25％関税は、アメリカ車の生産を米国に戻すという意味で重要だと思う。工場は「メキシコ国境の特別地帯」に戻る。

「不法移民」がメキシコ国境に押し寄せている。 「送還」されずに「特別地帯」の工場で「低賃金労働者」として雇用されれば、メキシコよりも低い賃金で「雇用」できる。

これは自動車会社にとっても「好条件」だと思う。「一時的移民」は「特別地帯」に住むことに限られるので、「犯罪等」を心配する必要はない。

特区の工場が稼働するには時間がかかる。米国の日産自動車には「低所得の自動車ユーザー」向けに「日本規格の660cc軽自動車」の製造・販売を特別に許可すべきだ。

トランプ大統領は先日の石破首相との記者会見で日産（車）に何度も言及していたので、軽自動車問題で日産と会うのではないかと思った。

バイデン政権によるインフレで、車の販売価格が上昇している。そして今回の「関税」でさらに車の値段が上がるのではないかと思う。ガソリン消費量が少なく、車両価格も安い「軽自動車」なら庶民は満足すると思う。

（クラシックカー）としての輸入はそのままにすべき。軽自動車（新車）の輸入は禁止し、日産自動車が米国で「軽自動車」を生産できるようにすべき。そして、中南米への輸出も認めるべき。

第1部 引用・参考文献
トランプ関税はEVの強制よりマシ？ - 米自動車ディーラーの本音
https://smart-mobility.jp/_ct/17748142

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

Automakers "hate" the "high wages" in the US and produce cars in Mexico

To everyone in the world's media　




2025-02-27: Weekday Edition,
President Trump signed a document on the 10th to impose a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum products. He also suggested the introduction of tariff measures on auto-mobiles and other products. Trump has no choice but to "do it"!

Ford and others are opposed to the tariffs, but automakers have no choice but to produce in the "special zone on the Mexican border".

Exceptions such as tariff exemptions that were applied to products from some countries and regions, such as Japan, will be abolished. I think that if exceptions are allowed, they will be watered down.

Ford Motor CEO Farley visited Washington on the 12th and warned federal lawmak-ers that the 25% tariffs that the US president plans to impose on Canada and Mexi-co will "deal a major blow" to the US auto industry. If that is the case, factories should be moved to the "special zone".

CEO Farley said on the 11th that the impact of the tariffs would be "devastating" for US automakers. If they move to the "special zone", "MAGA" will be realized. I'm happy!

He also said that Asian and European competitors would get "unexpected benefits" because the cars they import from their countries would not be subject to similar tariffs. Think of America's interests before other countries' interests!

Automakers "hate" America's "high wages" and produce cars in Mexico and Canada, but this "backfired." They say they will "add" the tariffs to the price. Sales will only decrease.

That's why I have proposed a "special zone on the Mexican border." If we accept "illegal immigrants" as "temporary immigrants" in the "special zone" and employ them as "low-wage workers," "everything" will be solved.

Build an automobile factory in Mexico, employ low-wage workers to manufacture cars, and export them to the United States. It was clear from the beginning that this would happen. Trump is smart. Bring the factories back to the United States!

It's not too late! Automakers should manufacture "American cars" in the "special zone on the Mexican border." "Temporary immigrants" earn lower wages than Mex-ican workers. They will also make money!

Producing cars in the "Special Zone on the Mexican Border" will increase "US GDP". Consumption of "agricultural products consumed by temporary immigrants" will in-crease. Farmers are also welcome.

Not only should Canadian and Mexican car companies "return" to the "Special Zone on the Mexican Border", but all products produced outside the US and imported to the US should be returned to the "Special Zone".

It is said that accepting "illegal immigrants" as "temporary immigrants" will cause US workers to lose their jobs, but that is not true. Please understand!

Until now, there are zero US workers because production has been outside the US. So, if factories are brought back to the US from overseas, employment for US workers will increase, but not "decrease".

It seems that President Trump is making a policy to raise "tariffs" to realize my proposal. Thank you, President Trump. Cheers to "MAGA"!

Part 1 Citations and References
Trump tariffs will have a "devastating effect" on the auto industry - Ford CEO warns

US to impose 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum products without exception from March 12th... Semiconductors and automobiles also "considered"
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/economy/20250211-OYT1T50111/

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

自動車メーカーは米国の「高賃金」を「嫌って」、メキシコやカナダで自動車を生産しているが、それが「裏目に出た」。関税分を価格に「上乗せ」するとしている。売り上げは減少するだけだ。

世界のメディアの「皆様」　へ　


私は不足する資料は提供いたしますのでメールで請求をしてください。


2025-02-27: 平日版、
トランプ大統領は10日、鉄鋼とアルミ製品に25％の関税を課す文書に署名した。自動車などへの関税措置導入も示唆した。トランプは「やる」しかない！

フォードなどは関税に反対しているが、自動車会社は「メキシコ国境の特別地帯」で生産するしかない。

日本など一部の国や地域からの製品に適用されていた関税免除などの例外は廃止される。例外を認めれば骨抜きになると思う。

フォード・モーターのファーリー最高経営責任者（CEO）は12日、ワシントンを訪れ、連邦議員らに対し、米大統領がカナダとメキシコに課す予定の25％関税は、米国の自動車産業に「大打撃を与える」と警告した。そうだとすれば、工場を「特別地帯」に移転すべきだ。

ファーリー最高経営責任者は11日、関税の影響は米国の自動車メーカーにとって「壊滅的」だと述べた。「特別地帯」に移転すれば、「MAGA」が実現する。嬉しい！

また、アジアや欧州の競合相手は、自国から輸入する自動車には同様の関税が課されないため、「予想外の利益」を得るだろうと述べた。他国の利益よりも米国の利益を考えろ！

自動車メーカーは米国の「高賃金」を「嫌って」、メキシコやカナダで自動車を生産しているが、それが「裏目に出た」。関税分を価格に「上乗せ」するとしている。売り上げは減少するだけだ。

だから私は「メキシコ国境特区」を提案してきた。「特別地帯」で「不法移民」を「一時的移民」として受け入れ、「低賃金労働者」として雇用すれば「すべて」解決する。

メキシコに自動車工場を建設し、低賃金労働者を雇用して自動車を製造し、米国に輸出する。こうなることは最初から明らかだった。トランプは賢い。工場を米国に戻せ！

まだ遅くない！自動車メーカーは「メキシコ国境特区」で「米国車」を製造すべきだ。「一時的移民」はメキシコ人労働者より賃金が低い。彼らも儲かる！

「メキシコ国境特区」で自動車を生産すれば「米国のGDP」が増加する。「一時的移民が消費する農産物」の消費が増える。農家も歓迎だ。

カナダとメキシコの自動車会社が「メキシコ国境の特別地帯」に「戻る」だけでなく、米国外で生産されて、米国に輸入されるすべての製品を「特別地帯」に戻すべきです。

「不法移民」を「一時的移民」として受け入れると、米国労働者が職を失うと言われていますが、それは事実ではありません。理解してください！

これまで米国外で生産していたため、米国労働者はゼロです。だから、海外から米国に工場を戻せば、米国労働者の雇用は増えますが、「減る」ことはありません。

トランプ大統領は私の提案を実現するために「関税」を上げる政策を立てているようです。トランプ大統領、ありがとう。「MAGA」に乾杯！

第1部 引用・参考文献
トランプ関税は自動車業界に「壊滅的な影響」－フォードCEOが警告

米国、鉄鋼・アルミ製品に例外なく25％の関税を課す、3月12日から…半導体・自動車も「検討」
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/economy/20250211-OYT1T50111/

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

自動車メーカーは米国の「高賃金」を「嫌って」、メキシコやカナダで自動車を生産しているが、それが「裏目に出た」。関税分を価格に「上乗せ」するとしている。売り上げは減少するだけだ。

世界のメディアの「皆様」　へ　


私は不足する資料は提供いたしますのでメールで請求をしてください。


2025-02-27: 平日版、
トランプ大統領は10日、鉄鋼とアルミ製品に25％の関税を課す文書に署名した。自動車などへの関税措置導入も示唆した。トランプは「やる」しかない！

フォードなどは関税に反対しているが、自動車会社は「メキシコ国境の特別地帯」で生産するしかない。

日本など一部の国や地域からの製品に適用されていた関税免除などの例外は廃止される。例外を認めれば骨抜きになると思う。

フォード・モーターのファーリー最高経営責任者（CEO）は12日、ワシントンを訪れ、連邦議員らに対し、米大統領がカナダとメキシコに課す予定の25％関税は、米国の自動車産業に「大打撃を与える」と警告した。そうだとすれば、工場を「特別地帯」に移転すべきだ。

ファーリー最高経営責任者は11日、関税の影響は米国の自動車メーカーにとって「壊滅的」だと述べた。「特別地帯」に移転すれば、「MAGA」が実現する。嬉しい！

また、アジアや欧州の競合相手は、自国から輸入する自動車には同様の関税が課されないため、「予想外の利益」を得るだろうと述べた。他国の利益よりも米国の利益を考えろ！

自動車メーカーは米国の「高賃金」を「嫌って」、メキシコやカナダで自動車を生産しているが、それが「裏目に出た」。関税分を価格に「上乗せ」するとしている。売り上げは減少するだけだ。

だから私は「メキシコ国境特区」を提案してきた。「特別地帯」で「不法移民」を「一時的移民」として受け入れ、「低賃金労働者」として雇用すれば「すべて」解決する。

メキシコに自動車工場を建設し、低賃金労働者を雇用して自動車を製造し、米国に輸出する。こうなることは最初から明らかだった。トランプは賢い。工場を米国に戻せ！

まだ遅くない！自動車メーカーは「メキシコ国境特区」で「米国車」を製造すべきだ。「一時的移民」はメキシコ人労働者より賃金が低い。彼らも儲かる！

「メキシコ国境特区」で自動車を生産すれば「米国のGDP」が増加する。「一時的移民が消費する農産物」の消費が増える。農家も歓迎だ。

カナダとメキシコの自動車会社が「メキシコ国境の特別地帯」に「戻る」だけでなく、米国外で生産されて、米国に輸入されるすべての製品を「特別地帯」に戻すべきです。

「不法移民」を「一時的移民」として受け入れると、米国労働者が職を失うと言われていますが、それは事実ではありません。理解してください！

これまで米国外で生産していたため、米国労働者はゼロです。だから、海外から米国に工場を戻せば、米国労働者の雇用は増えますが、「減る」ことはありません。

トランプ大統領は私の提案を実現するために「関税」を上げる政策を立てているようです。トランプ大統領、ありがとう。「MAGA」に乾杯！

第1部 引用・参考文献
トランプ関税は自動車業界に「壊滅的な影響」－フォードCEOが警告

米国、鉄鋼・アルミ製品に例外なく25％の関税を課す、3月12日から…半導体・自動車も「検討」
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/economy/20250211-OYT1T50111/

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

but to countries where nuclear possession is de facto permitted.

To everyone in the world's media　


I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.


2025-02-26: Weekday edition,
On his first day in office, US President Trump called North Korea a "nuclear power" and boasted about his relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. As ex-pected of President Trump. It's clear and easy to understand.

It appears that he has virtually acknowledged North Korea's nuclear status and sent an invitation to Chairman Kim to begin new negotiations, which seems to be causing a big stir, especially in South Korea.

The expression "nuclear powers" mentioned by President Trump does not refer to the five countries that are legally permitted to possess nuclear weapons under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) regime, but rather to countries where nuclear possession is de facto tolerated.

Until now, there has been no precedent for a US president to explicitly refer to North Korea as a "nuclear power". This means that the second Trump administra-tion is sending a strong signal to North Korea that it is willing to negotiate without the premise of denuclearization.

South Korea has expressed a position that emphasizes that "as long as the NPT ex-ists, North Korea cannot obtain the status of a nuclear power." Politicians and bu-reaucrats in South Korea and Japan seem to have dementia.

The Trump administration has recognized North Korea as a nuclear power. I think this is a realistic response that is typical of Trump. North Korea should act respon-sibly as a nuclear power.

The Trump administration should also be realistic about how to deal with Taiwan. The United States should recognize Taiwan as part of China and clarify "One China".

If the Trump administration recognizes Taiwan as Chinese territory, I think it should "sever diplomatic relations" with the Taiwanese government. Travel between the two countries should be conducted as "part of China".

Therefore, the United States needs an "alternative" to "Taiwan" in terms of its se-curity policy. That is why I propose the "Philippine Special Zone" as an "alternative" to "Taiwan".

The "Philippine Special Zone" is jointly operated by the "UK, the US, and the Philip-pines". It is mainly an "overseas factory zone" for the "UK and the US".

The Trump administration should consult with the Philippine government and sta-tion US and British troops in the Philippines. The pretext is to protect the "Philippine Special Zone".

Based on this position, I propose that Palestinians in the Gaza Strip be allowed to move to the "Philippine Special Zone" if they so wish.

President Trump should make a deal with President Xi Jinping. China should be al-lowed to integrate Taiwan in exchange for giving up its hegemony over the South China Sea and the Senkaku Islands.

Territorial issues are the core of China. But this is what has caused the conflict. Trump should resolve the conflict between China and Japan, the Philippines, Vi-etnam, etc.

President Trump is a perceptive president who finds realistic solutions. I think Pres-ident Xi Jinping would accept President Trump's deal.

I think President Trump can create a G3MA with the United States, Russia, and Chi-na by making a deal with President Putin on the Ukraine issue and President Xi Jinping on the Taiwan issue. He would definitely win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Part 1 Citations and References
President Trump's statement that "North Korea is a nuclear power" is a negotiating signal to Chairman Kim...South Korea is confused
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d3f89c943dff0cd6c2027273331244163c0e9e2f

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

The expression "nuclear powers" mentioned by President Trump does not refer to the five countries

To everyone in the world's media　


I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.


2025-02-26: Weekday edition,
On his first day in office, US President Trump called North Korea a "nuclear power" and boasted about his relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. As ex-pected of President Trump. It's clear and easy to understand.

It appears that he has virtually acknowledged North Korea's nuclear status and sent an invitation to Chairman Kim to begin new negotiations, which seems to be causing a big stir, especially in South Korea.

The expression "nuclear powers" mentioned by President Trump does not refer to the five countries that are legally permitted to possess nuclear weapons under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) regime, but rather to countries where nuclear possession is de facto tolerated.

Until now, there has been no precedent for a US president to explicitly refer to North Korea as a "nuclear power". This means that the second Trump administra-tion is sending a strong signal to North Korea that it is willing to negotiate without the premise of denuclearization.

South Korea has expressed a position that emphasizes that "as long as the NPT ex-ists, North Korea cannot obtain the status of a nuclear power." Politicians and bu-reaucrats in South Korea and Japan seem to have dementia.

The Trump administration has recognized North Korea as a nuclear power. I think this is a realistic response that is typical of Trump. North Korea should act respon-sibly as a nuclear power.

The Trump administration should also be realistic about how to deal with Taiwan. The United States should recognize Taiwan as part of China and clarify "One China".

If the Trump administration recognizes Taiwan as Chinese territory, I think it should "sever diplomatic relations" with the Taiwanese government. Travel between the two countries should be conducted as "part of China".

Therefore, the United States needs an "alternative" to "Taiwan" in terms of its se-curity policy. That is why I propose the "Philippine Special Zone" as an "alternative" to "Taiwan".

The "Philippine Special Zone" is jointly operated by the "UK, the US, and the Philip-pines". It is mainly an "overseas factory zone" for the "UK and the US".

The Trump administration should consult with the Philippine government and sta-tion US and British troops in the Philippines. The pretext is to protect the "Philippine Special Zone".

Based on this position, I propose that Palestinians in the Gaza Strip be allowed to move to the "Philippine Special Zone" if they so wish.

President Trump should make a deal with President Xi Jinping. China should be al-lowed to integrate Taiwan in exchange for giving up its hegemony over the South China Sea and the Senkaku Islands.

Territorial issues are the core of China. But this is what has caused the conflict. Trump should resolve the conflict between China and Japan, the Philippines, Vi-etnam, etc.

President Trump is a perceptive president who finds realistic solutions. I think Pres-ident Xi Jinping would accept President Trump's deal.

I think President Trump can create a G3MA with the United States, Russia, and Chi-na by making a deal with President Putin on the Ukraine issue and President Xi Jinping on the Taiwan issue. He would definitely win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Part 1 Citations and References
President Trump's statement that "North Korea is a nuclear power" is a negotiating signal to Chairman Kim...South Korea is confused
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d3f89c943dff0cd6c2027273331244163c0e9e2f

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

The expression "nuclear powers" mentioned by President Trump does not refer to the five countries

To everyone in the world's media　


I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.


2025-02-26: Weekday edition,
On his first day in office, US President Trump called North Korea a "nuclear power" and boasted about his relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. As ex-pected of President Trump. It's clear and easy to understand.

It appears that he has virtually acknowledged North Korea's nuclear status and sent an invitation to Chairman Kim to begin new negotiations, which seems to be causing a big stir, especially in South Korea.

The expression "nuclear powers" mentioned by President Trump does not refer to the five countries that are legally permitted to possess nuclear weapons under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) regime, but rather to countries where nuclear possession is de facto tolerated.

Until now, there has been no precedent for a US president to explicitly refer to North Korea as a "nuclear power". This means that the second Trump administra-tion is sending a strong signal to North Korea that it is willing to negotiate without the premise of denuclearization.

South Korea has expressed a position that emphasizes that "as long as the NPT ex-ists, North Korea cannot obtain the status of a nuclear power." Politicians and bu-reaucrats in South Korea and Japan seem to have dementia.

The Trump administration has recognized North Korea as a nuclear power. I think this is a realistic response that is typical of Trump. North Korea should act respon-sibly as a nuclear power.

The Trump administration should also be realistic about how to deal with Taiwan. The United States should recognize Taiwan as part of China and clarify "One China".

If the Trump administration recognizes Taiwan as Chinese territory, I think it should "sever diplomatic relations" with the Taiwanese government. Travel between the two countries should be conducted as "part of China".

Therefore, the United States needs an "alternative" to "Taiwan" in terms of its se-curity policy. That is why I propose the "Philippine Special Zone" as an "alternative" to "Taiwan".

The "Philippine Special Zone" is jointly operated by the "UK, the US, and the Philip-pines". It is mainly an "overseas factory zone" for the "UK and the US".

The Trump administration should consult with the Philippine government and sta-tion US and British troops in the Philippines. The pretext is to protect the "Philippine Special Zone".

Based on this position, I propose that Palestinians in the Gaza Strip be allowed to move to the "Philippine Special Zone" if they so wish.

President Trump should make a deal with President Xi Jinping. China should be al-lowed to integrate Taiwan in exchange for giving up its hegemony over the South China Sea and the Senkaku Islands.

Territorial issues are the core of China. But this is what has caused the conflict. Trump should resolve the conflict between China and Japan, the Philippines, Vi-etnam, etc.

President Trump is a perceptive president who finds realistic solutions. I think Pres-ident Xi Jinping would accept President Trump's deal.

I think President Trump can create a G3MA with the United States, Russia, and Chi-na by making a deal with President Putin on the Ukraine issue and President Xi Jinping on the Taiwan issue. He would definitely win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Part 1 Citations and References
President Trump's statement that "North Korea is a nuclear power" is a negotiating signal to Chairman Kim...South Korea is confused
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d3f89c943dff0cd6c2027273331244163c0e9e2f

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

トランプ大統領が言及した「核保有国」という表現は、核保有が事実上容認されている国を指す。

世界のメディアの「皆様」　へ　


私は不足する資料は提供いたしますのでメールで請求をしてください。


2025-02-26: 平日版、
トランプ米大統領は就任初日に北朝鮮を「核保有国」と呼び、北朝鮮の金正恩委員長との関係を自慢した。さすがトランプ大統領。明快で分かりやすい。

北朝鮮の核保有を事実上認め、金委員長に新たな交渉を始めるよう招待状を送ったとみられ、特に韓国では大きな波紋を呼んでいるようだ。

トランプ大統領が言及した「核保有国」という表現は、核兵器不拡散条約（NPT）体制下で核兵器保有が法的に認められている5カ国を指すのではなく、核保有が事実上容認されている国を指す。

これまで、米国大統領が北朝鮮を「核保有国」と明確に言及した前例はない。これは、第2次トランプ政権が北朝鮮に対し、非核化を前提とせずに交渉する用意があるという強いシグナルを送っていることを意味する。

韓国は「NPTが存在する限り、北朝鮮は核保有国の地位を得ることはできない」と強調する立場を表明している。韓国と日本の政治家や官僚は認知症のようだ。

トランプ政権は北朝鮮を核保有国と認めた。これはトランプらしい現実的な対応だと思う。北朝鮮は核保有国として責任ある行動を取るべきだ。

トランプ政権は台湾の扱いについても現実的になるべきだ。米国は台湾を中国の一部として認め、「一つの中国」を明確にすべきだ。

トランプ政権が台湾を中国領土として認めるなら、台湾政府と「外交関係を断絶」すべきだと思う。両国間の往来は「中国の一部」として行うべきだ。

したがって、米国は安全保障政策上、「台湾」の「代替」が必要だ。だから私は「台湾」の「代替」として「フィリピンの特別地帯」を提案している。

「フィリピンの特別地帯」は「英国、米国、フィリピン」が共同で運営している。主に「英国と米国」の「海外工場地帯」である。

トランプ政権はフィリピン政府と協議し、米英軍をフィリピンに駐留させるべきである。名目は「フィリピンの特別地帯」を守ることである。

この立場を踏まえ、私はガザ地区のパレスチナ人が希望すれば「フィリピンの特別地帯」への移住を認めることを提案する。

トランプ大統領は習近平国家主席と取引すべきである。中国は南シナ海と尖閣諸島の覇権を放棄する代わりに台湾を統合することを認めるべきである。

領土問題は中国の核心である。しかし、これが紛争の種となっている。トランプは中国と日本、フィリピン、ベトナムなどの紛争を解決するべきである。

トランプ大統領は現実的な解決策を見つける洞察力のある大統領である。習近平国家主席はトランプ大統領の取引を受け入れるだろうと私は思う。

トランプ大統領は、ウクライナ問題でプーチン大統領と、台湾問題で習近平主席と取引をすることで、米国、ロシア、中国とのG3MAを作れると思う。彼は間違いなくノーベル平和賞を受賞するだろう。

第1部 引用・参考文献
トランプ大統領の「北朝鮮は核保有国」発言は金委員長への交渉シグナル…韓国は困惑
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d3f89c943dff0cd6c2027273331244163c0e9e2f

明日また書きます。


第2部。「入管法違反事件」「平日版」。
日本は「法治国家」ではない「異常な人権侵害国家」です。

「国際社会」の「皆様」、助けてください！

まずは、2010年の「入管法違反幇助罪」の「冤罪」について読んでください。

「第1章」。事件の概要は以下のとおりです。

2008年秋、私の会社（私が社長）は「留学ビザで留学中の中国人」を雇う約束をしました。私は彼らに「レフコ」が翌春大学を卒業したら「雇用する」という「雇用契約書」を「交付」しました。

しかし、その後、2008年に「リーマンショック」が起こりました。

その結果、翌年以降の「システム開発」の受注は「キャンセル」されました。

その結果、「LEFCO」は2009年に「入社予定だった者」の「雇用」を「取り消した」。

そのため「彼ら」は、2009年に卒業した後も、学生時代にアルバイトをしていた飲食店で働き続けた。

2010年5月、中国人は「在留資格外活動」による「入管法第70条違反」で逮捕された。

彼らが逮捕された後の2010年6月、私と採用担当の中国人（KingGungaku）も逮捕された。

その理由は、中国人の「入管法第70条違反（資格外活動）」に対する「刑法の（幇助の罪）」です。

＜逮捕理由＞検察は、私とキンググンガクが中国人に「虚偽の雇用契約書」を渡したことは、「刑法の幇助の罪」に当たるとした。

「第2章」。判決文の罪状：（恣意的で滑稽）

起訴状の罪状は「入管法第22条の4の4」の「規定そのもの」です。

虚偽の書類を提出して「在留資格」を取得した場合、法務大臣は「裁量」で「在留資格」を取り消すことができる。（そして、強制送還される）。

したがって、中国人が「虚偽の書類」を提出しても、犯罪にはならない。無実の行為を「幇助」することは犯罪ではない。

判決文の「処罰理由」：
1. 中国人が「虚偽の雇用契約書」を提出して「在留資格」を取得したこと。
2. そして、入管法に違反したこと（在留資格外活動）。
3. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たのは、「我々」が中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を提供したからだ。
4. 中国人が「在留資格」を得たため、日本に「居住」できた。
5. そのため、中国人は「不法就労」できた。
6. したがって、中国人に「偽の雇用契約書」を「提供」した「我々」は、中国人の「資格外の活動」を「幇助」したとして処罰された。

これは恣意的な「法の論理」の「誤り」である。
この理屈は「風が吹けば樽屋が（儲かる）」という「論法」だ。これは国際的にも「法的論理」に反する。

「起訴状の犯罪理由」は、「特別法」である「入管法」の規定が、「一般法」である「刑法」より優先するので、犯罪にできない。

私の主張：
「１」：入管法は、外国人が虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を取得した行為（入管法：22－4－4条、在留資格の取消）は、法務大臣が「行政処分」で取り消しする、と規定している。これで終わりだ。

「２」：「資格外の就労の活動」を行った中国人は無罪である。その理由は、彼らの「雇用主」が入管法73-2条の「不法就労の助長の罪」で処罰されていないからである。

したがって、「法の下の平等」の原則の下では、中国人は無罪である。

日本政府は、全く同じ「犯罪的理由」で「外交官やフィリピン大使館職員」を処罰した。
しかし、中国政府と同様に、フィリピン政府も沈黙している。

続きは土曜版に掲載します。

第３部。特区建設。新たなビジネスモデル。
「特区」は難民や移民を「一時的移民」労働者として「受け入れ」、居住地を「特区」内に限定する。

先進国は彼らを低賃金労働者として活用し、再び高度経済成長を実現する。
難民や移民は仕事を得て、人間らしい希望のある生活を送ることができる。
一時的移民は低賃金だが「衣食住、医療費、教育は無料」です。
NO2:https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1:https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

NO4：～NO10：は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

よろしくお願いします。

長野恭博

過去の記事は下記ブログでご覧いただけます。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

As expected of President Trump! "Ukraine may become Russia someday,"

To everyone in the world's media　


I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.


2025-02-25: Weekday edition,
As expected of President Trump! "Ukraine may become Russia someday," Trump blurted out in a TV interview. The Ukraine war is a war that Biden, who likes "war business," has been planning since he was vice president.

In an interview with FOX News broadcast on the 10th, US President Trump said that Ukraine "may become Russia someday." I think this is the "true feelings" of many American intellectuals.

Trump said, "Ukraine may or may not make a deal. It may or may not become Rus-sia someday." The Maidan Revolution was a revolution started by Biden, so I think it would be "reasonable" to reverse it.

I think President Trump made this statement because he knows Ukraine well. Western Ukraine, where the current administration is based, is poor in resources, but the east is a heavy industrial area with strong pro-Russian sentiment, and the south is a multi-ethnic "commerce and shipping area."

The Crimean Peninsula, an important ice-free port for Russia, has a history of con-stant tug-of-war between the East and the West. I think Trump's remarks included these points.

In 2008, NATO declared that Ukraine and Georgia had agreed to join, raising Rus-sia's alarm.

At the end of 2013, Biden urged the Ukrainian people to overthrow the pro-Russian government, but a recording of his subordinate Nuland plotting a puppet govern-ment was leaked.

When the Maidan Revolution broke out in 2014, Vice President Biden and his subor-dinate Nuland were involved, working hard to overthrow the pro-Russian govern-ment and establish a pro-Western government.

When the pro-Western President Poroshenko took office in the Maidan Revolution of 2014, Russia occupied the Crimean Peninsula and annexed it to Russia. At the time, President Obama rejected Biden's proposal to enter the war.

However, after the Biden administration was launched, the United States regained its "Biden-style authority" through the "Ukraine-Russia War." However, Americans' "values" regarding the Ukraine War are very different.

Without NATO, the value of the United States would decline and it would be unable to export arms, but Republican President Trump has been pushing the idea that "NATO is unnecessary" and that "NATO is unnecessary."

As soon as he took office, Trump put "America First" into practice with "tariffs." This is different from Biden, who uses "war business" as his backbone. The "EU," which was subordinate to Biden, is in chaos.

I am against the "war business." So, although I "have different views" on "immigra-tion issues" and "tariff issues," I support Trump's "America First" approach. Good luck, President Trump!

Part 1 Citations and References
"Ukraine may become Russia someday," Trump blurts out in TV interview

https://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3562400
Biden, who established a puppet US government in Ukraine in 2014, and Nuland, who "hands out cookies"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/087fd5204f4dd44820b6c490ec8ff92c03be266f
What is the US's global strategy behind the Ukraine war?
https://www.tyg.jp/research/detail.html?id=13842

I'll write again tomorrow.


Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/