To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-05: Weekday edition,
The "Philippine Special Zone" will be the "front line" for Western companies to ex-port to the Chinese market. Western governments should support "my plan" to re-locate "Palestinians in Gaza" to the Philippines.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu praised President Trump's Gaza relocation plan. "This is not ethnic cleansing" and "the only viable plan." I think so, but the destina-tion is "NG."
Prime Minister Netanyahu praised President Trump's plan as a "bold new plan" and said, "If the people (of Gaza) want to relocate voluntarily, they should be given the option." I think they should relocate voluntarily.
I think President Trump's "Riviera Plan" is based on the premise that the United States will take possession of Gaza. This is impossible. Gaza is a "Palestinian-controlled area." Trump's Riviera Plan should be "withdrawn."
President Trump's proposal is a "forced relocation proposal." If the relocation is voluntary, Trump should also make a "correction" to clear up the "misunderstand-ing." Trump should relocate "Palestinian hopefuls" to areas far from Palestine.
I propose the "Mindanao Island" in the Philippines. More than 20% of the island's residents are Muslim. The "Bangsamoro Autonomous Government" will be officially launched in May this year.
I am considering making the areas of Mindanao outside the "Bangsamoro Autono-mous Government" into a "Philippine Special Zone."
There is another reason why I am promoting the "Philippine Special Zone." That is because the integration of Taiwan into China is inevitable. I think the Trump admin-istration is aiming to peacefully integrate Taiwan into China and build a peaceful re-lationship with China.
After Taiwan is integrated into China, I think the "pro-American region" that will re-place Taiwan is the Philippines. I think the United States should involve the UK and use the Philippines as a "nearshoring" for the Chinese market.
China is moving its production bases to Mexico, which is closer to the American market. The Philippines should be a back door to China for Western companies. The US and UK should take advantage of it. That is the "Philippine Special Zone".
The US plans to accept "illegal immigrants" from Latin America heading to the US as "temporary immigrants" in the "special zone on the Mexican border" and employ them as "low-wage workers".
"The US and UK" plan to accept "Palestinians" from the "Gaza Strip" as "temporary immigrants" in the "Philippine Special Zone" and employ them as "low-wage work-ers".
The US and European countries are losing out in the "Chinese market", but con-versely Chinese products are flooding the Western market. The Trump administra-tion will fight back with "tariffs", but essentially they should fight Chinese products with "quality and price".
Part 1 Citations and References
Accept Gaza residents in Japan? Pros and cons of Prime Minister Ishiba's remarks and President Trump's "ownership of Gaza", what exactly are "refugees"?
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/9eea96f00b7e2499a67354ed37507b7162e18c1e
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu: "This is not ethnic cleansing," "It's the only feasi-ble plan"... Trump
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250217-OYT1T50023/
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-05: Weekday edition,
The "Philippine Special Zone" will be the "front line" for Western companies to ex-port to the Chinese market. Western governments should support "my plan" to re-locate "Palestinians in Gaza" to the Philippines.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu praised President Trump's Gaza relocation plan. "This is not ethnic cleansing" and "the only viable plan." I think so, but the destina-tion is "NG."
Prime Minister Netanyahu praised President Trump's plan as a "bold new plan" and said, "If the people (of Gaza) want to relocate voluntarily, they should be given the option." I think they should relocate voluntarily.
I think President Trump's "Riviera Plan" is based on the premise that the United States will take possession of Gaza. This is impossible. Gaza is a "Palestinian-controlled area." Trump's Riviera Plan should be "withdrawn."
President Trump's proposal is a "forced relocation proposal." If the relocation is voluntary, Trump should also make a "correction" to clear up the "misunderstand-ing." Trump should relocate "Palestinian hopefuls" to areas far from Palestine.
I propose the "Mindanao Island" in the Philippines. More than 20% of the island's residents are Muslim. The "Bangsamoro Autonomous Government" will be officially launched in May this year.
I am considering making the areas of Mindanao outside the "Bangsamoro Autono-mous Government" into a "Philippine Special Zone."
There is another reason why I am promoting the "Philippine Special Zone." That is because the integration of Taiwan into China is inevitable. I think the Trump admin-istration is aiming to peacefully integrate Taiwan into China and build a peaceful re-lationship with China.
After Taiwan is integrated into China, I think the "pro-American region" that will re-place Taiwan is the Philippines. I think the United States should involve the UK and use the Philippines as a "nearshoring" for the Chinese market.
China is moving its production bases to Mexico, which is closer to the American market. The Philippines should be a back door to China for Western companies. The US and UK should take advantage of it. That is the "Philippine Special Zone".
The US plans to accept "illegal immigrants" from Latin America heading to the US as "temporary immigrants" in the "special zone on the Mexican border" and employ them as "low-wage workers".
"The US and UK" plan to accept "Palestinians" from the "Gaza Strip" as "temporary immigrants" in the "Philippine Special Zone" and employ them as "low-wage work-ers".
The US and European countries are losing out in the "Chinese market", but con-versely Chinese products are flooding the Western market. The Trump administra-tion will fight back with "tariffs", but essentially they should fight Chinese products with "quality and price".
Part 1 Citations and References
Accept Gaza residents in Japan? Pros and cons of Prime Minister Ishiba's remarks and President Trump's "ownership of Gaza", what exactly are "refugees"?
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/9eea96f00b7e2499a67354ed37507b7162e18c1e
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu: "This is not ethnic cleansing," "It's the only feasi-ble plan"... Trump
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250217-OYT1T50023/
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
