現在ヨーロッパを揺るがしている金融危機問題や世界のエネルギー問題、政治的混乱、民族間(宗教)対立、人心の劣化、などなど世界のニュースは毎日話題に事欠きませんねー。
私は、現在起こっているユーロ危機は、2007年のサブプライムローン問題が起こったときにこうなる事は解っていました。 東京在住中に知り合った、とある優秀な知人の証券マンの人からその内実情を聞いていたからです。 総額6600兆円規模に膨らんだこの世に存在していない架空バブルマネーの収斂。
その反動のひとつの波が、現在の使い捨て、借金をベースとした欧米型の金融システム社会を揺るがしている状況です。
その金融問題に揺られつつ、現在日本を最も揺るがしている原発問題も様々な原因(東電、政府、利権等)はありますが、あーなったのは “原発” というモノを使い続けていたら、何時かはこーなる可能性があるという、ひとつの例が起こったに過ぎません。 いつかは起こる問題でした。 それが “今” な、だけです。
日本もかなりの情報を隠してはいますが、それでもまだ旧ソ連のチェルノブイリよりは遥かに情報統制がユルユルですし、ネットもこれだけ開かれていますから、ある程度は個人の判断で動ける範囲もあると思います。 それらを見てどう動くかは各個人に任されていると思います。
私の知人のように沖縄に引っ越した人もいるし、海外に引っ越した人もいるし、仕事の関係で関東圏に留まらざるを得ない人たちもたくさんいる。 私のように沖縄に引っ越しつつも実家に戻るハメになった人間もいる。
どんな行動をしたにせよ、誰がどうで、何が正しいという判断は出来ないと思います。 ただ己に課せられた運命を生き、意志をもってその状況を切り開いて行くのが全ての人間に課せられた螺旋のしんか〔進化・深化・新化・真価・新華・心花・新価・神歌・心火・神化〕 の法則であり定め。
まーそこまで、あまり固っ苦しく書くつはありませんでしたが、少しばかり世相に関して呟かせてもらいました。
さてそれでは本題に入りたいと思います。
この現実と思われている社会を構築したモノは何なのか? なぜこうなっているのか? こうなってしまったのか?について少しばかり言及してみたいと思います。 この根本的な問題(Foundamental Problem)を考えなくては、いくら政治家を変えたり、フリーエネルギーを開発しても同じことの繰り返し、です。
根本からの ”Change” 。 それが今、AD2000年から始まったUnplanned Actionを起こす天王星(Uranus)支配の水瓶座(Aquarius)の時代の役目。
世間一般ではまだまだ受け入れられてはいませんが、精神世界系の情報では、『この世は、全宇宙も含めて、ひとつの源物質とそれらを動かしている波動(Vibration)・振動から成っている』 と述べられています。 表面上は複雑に見えて、その実はこの上なくシンプル。 まずその事に気づかなくてはなりません。
しかし、今回はこの事について詳しく言及はせずに、そのシステムについてピックアップしてみたいと思います。
参考までにケイシー・リーディングでこの事を質問したQ&Aを採り上げてみますと。
〔問4〕:「“ひとつの原物質がいろいろな力の度合いで振動している。音や熱、光、電気は一なるエネルギーの特定の度合いによってこの第一原質が変化したものである。 変化率を除けば、電気あるいは鉄など、どのようなモノの間にも違いは全く見られない”。 この説明は正しいでしょうか?」
〔答4〕:正しく説かれている。
〔問5〕:「人体の心臓は、太陽系の太陽によって比較できる。 そこで、太陽は太陽系の力の中心である。 血液が心臓から動脈を通って流れてゆくように、力は太陽から出て各惑星の反対の極に引き寄せれ、この流れに乗って磁場→電場(電気)→光→色→熱→音、そして最後に物質と、次第に波動の度合いを低めつつ進んでゆく。 そこで、物質はエネルギーの母ではなく、所産である” これは正しく説かれていますでしょうか。」
〔答5〕:「正しく説かれている。 それは人体機能の営みの中で、現に起こっていることである。」
〔問7〕:「”この力は光、光波と少しづつ振動数を低下させて分光器に入ってくる時に、色となって現れる。 太陽や恒星上でみられる炎や燃えている金属は、観測されているそうした天体の自然の分光作用によって、エーテルの振動数が色分解されたモノである” これは正しいでしょうか?」
〔答7〕:これは正しい。
〔問10〕:「“エーテル(Ether)は、我々のより高い世界の化合物であり、それが我々を形而上学の世界に導き、全ての原子は一つであるとの認識に導く” このエーテルに関する説明は正しいでしょうか。 もっとよい説明はありますか?」
〔答10〕:これ以上の定義はない。 これは正しい。 というのも、重力に関わるプラス・マイナスの力の説明と同じく、それらの力は人の進歩に働きかけ、内奥の力が占めるその人の形而上的位置、状態に向けられる想念の応用に働きかけるからである。 人体の心の力、あるいは形而上的活動を強める特殊な性質の病気があるというのもこのためである。
また、感覚器官を鈍化させ過ぎ、受け身の方向にばかりもってくる病もある。 とはいえ、完全なバランスのとれた正常な心が、活動的であるばかりに、人からもバランスが取れていないとか、ただ変わっているだけだとか見倣されることもあるのだ。」
~~~~~~(とりあえず抜粋これぐらい)~~~~~~~~~
この事について解っている方には何の説明も必要ないでしょうが、ここに大森先生が姓名学を研究された時に導き出されたひとつの答えも絡んできます。 つまり、
”名前(Name)とは波動(Vibration)である”
という。
ですから、同姓同名でも一つとして同じ運命はなく、あと、器(うつわ)の問題も絡んできます。 同じ31画の頭領運にしても、その器から何万人も何百万人も従える指導者もいれば、3人ぐらいの組織の指導者もいる。 しかし、どちらも同じ指導者。 器が違うだけで ”方向性” は同じ。
41画の会社経営者にしても同じ。 トヨタ自動車の豊田章男氏も熊崎式の姓名学に基づいた41画の理想的な会社経営者の名前ですが、私が居たアメリカの寿司屋のオーナーも近くのお寺に50万円だして頼んでつけてもらった同じく熊崎式に基づいた41画の名前。 あと、斎藤一人さんの総格も41画です。
皆、それぞれ器は異なりますが、会社経営者向きの名前(画数)です。
よく誤解されるのですが、その人の天格から運良く41画や31画にもっていけて、私も改名の説明の際に、歴史上の人物やこれらの人物を例に取って説明するのですが、41画や31画とかににしたら誰でもあーなれると勘違いされる方が目につきます。
そこには欲が感じられるので、戒めるために 『ただ単に解りやすい例として説明しただけですよ』 とは言うのですが、その事はあまり頭に残らず素通りしているのが感じられます。
とと、少し脱線してしましたが、このように日本を代表する占いである姓名学の “名前” ですらも、その異なる角度からの分析からも ”波動(Vibration)” に帰せられるのです。
あと、余談ですが、最近はあまり採り上げませんが、姓名学の “さ行(さ、し、す、せ、そ)” の問題です。 大森先生が調べられたところでは、サ行は発音した際、呼吸の波動が前歯に当たり、その際その振動が頭蓋骨を伝って脳に有害な振動を伝え、運命に悪い影響を及ぼすとのことでした。
どうしてもサ行を入れなくては作れない名前の場合のみ、仕方なくサ行を入れますが、その際は完全なパターンの権能の一割引きぐらいだと仰っていました。 そうでない、あまり良くない画数と五行の流れですと、急変難を起こすケースがあるようです。
このように、他の “ある程度” 現実的な角度から調べてみても、“波動“ というモノの人体に及ぼす影響が見て取れます。
他にもまだまだ色々とネタはありますが、とりあえず思いつくままつぶやいてみました。
後からなんか思い付いたら書くかもしれません。
とりあえず失礼します。
注:下の原文載っけておきますので興味のある方は研究して見てください。エンジニアの方には参考になるかも知れません。
TEXT OF READING 195-70 M 46 (Realtor; Mfgr. of Auto
Accessories) This psychic reading given by Edgar Cayce at his office, 115 West 35th Street, Virginia Beach, Va., this 9th day of May, 1930, in accordance with request made by self - Mr. [195].
P R E S E N T
Edgar Cayce; Mrs. Cayce, Conductor; Gladys Davis, Steno.
R E A D I N G
Time of Reading 11:00 A. M. Eastern Standard Time. ..., Ohio.
1. GC: You will have before you the body and enquiring mind of [195], of ..., Ohio, and the article Positive and Negative Force that I hold in my hand. You will answer the questions I may ask concerning statements made in the context, as I read them, and make suggestions for the bettering of the article.
2. EC: Yes, we have the body, the enquiring mind, [195], and the article as written by this body as regards Positive and Negative Force. In making suggestions for the better presentation of such data in such an article, this should be kept in mind - that these may be made either in answer TO that written or in keeping WITH that written; or, to put in DIFFERENT words, may be answered in a positive or a negative manner, even as the article; or it may be given as in keeping with, and presenting in, a different angle. Ready for questions.
3. (Q) Page 2 - lines 9 to 12. ["The positive may be considered as the active forces in their activity and the negative as those tending to keep the balance."] Please expand on this and give better explanation of Positive and Negative Force.
(A) This [is] as GOOD an explanation as may be given, other than illustrating same; for it IS a positive or a PLAIN STATEMENT as to the conditions as regarding relativity of force; for POSITIVE is the active and negative is passive, as illustrated by the article in its various phases. The statement we would NOT expand upon in THIS instance, for it (the statement) must react with the individual DEVELOPMENT of each individual who takes the time to become positive OR negative to the statement, and as one responds to same may the activity of the statement be seen.
4. (Q) Page 3 - lines 1 to 8 - ["Consider Gravity - This applies right here, there and everywhere. This, too, may be considered a negative force, for it tends to balance the positive forces. Gravitational forces are vibratory forces and might be defined as the centralization of vibratory forces ready to change into power by non-activity."] Is gravity a negative force? How could this be better explained here?
(A) Gravity in this SENSE - as explained in that, in the activity that becomes passive in its force - gravity becomes the negative force, see? even as is illustrated. Better illustration may be had in that of the Radio-Active Appliance, as [to] how one becomes positive, the other negative, dependent upon which way the cycle begins by the change in the active force by which one is applied to a body in the first place, see?
5. (Q) Page 3 - lines 16 to 24 - ["With the assumption that their radial forces are thrown off this planet at or near Cancer and Capricorn, then it were possible when the vibrations of sun's rays at a certain deflection on passing through these emanating radial vibrations to set up a partial vacuum, thereby causing winds."] Is this correct?
(A) This correct.
6. (Q) Page 4 - lines 6 to 13 - ["The one substance vibrates in different dynamic degrees, and sound, heat, light, electricity, are the effections of the one substance by specific degrees of the One Energy, and there is no difference between anything such as electricity and, say iron, save in rate of effection."] Is this correctly stated?
(A) Correctly stated.
7. (Q) Page 5 - lines 5 to 20 - ["The heart in the human body may be compared to the sun of a solar system. Then by analogy the sun is the center of forces of the solar system. Similarly to the blood flowing from the heart through the arterial system, Force emerges from the sun drawn to the opposite polarity of the planets and in this outgoing flow it would be possible to develop magnetism, electricity, light, color, heat, sound, and lastly matter, in the order of lessening dynamic degrees of vibration. Matter then would be the offspring of energy and not the parent, as is often thought."] Is this correctly stated?
(A) Correctly stated, and just what happens in the human organism.
8. (Q) Page 5 - lines 21 to 25 - ["It is more than probable that at the sun's surface there are many higher degrees of vibrations than are known or understood on this planet."] Is this correct?
(A) Correct.
9. (Q) Page 5 - lines 27 to 31 - ["When this force, decreasing in vibrations to light and light waves, enter spectroscope, they will emerge as colors. Evidence of flames and metals on fire on sun and stars is in all probability due to etheric vibrations being broken into color by formation of natural spectroscope at the sun or satellite under observation."] Is this correct?
(A) This correct.
10. (Q) Page 6 - lines 3 and 4 - ["As given above these radial emanations are negative forces."] Are radial forces negative forces?
(A) Not always are radial forces negative forces. Only when they become passive, or of being acted upon as gravitation, do they become negative forces - while they are emanating from the positive; else they would not be drawn to the earth's force, in ITS emanation with the positive rays - and they are positive rays. From the sun's emanation does it produce the heat, see? This is seen in a BETTER application, in that the deflection from - and the direct rays OF - the sun's emanation TO the earth, THROUGH the various stages of its activity, brings summer, or the heat wave, or the moving OF the various forms; for these acting UPON - become negative, and then are POSITIVE in their action, though at times these, to be sure, become negative in their action; for each has its radial activity and is throwing OFF, as well as drawing TO. Hence the various positions or conditions as is seen in sun, through the activity of the various forms of gas or metal, or those various conditions that seem to cause the various eruptions as apparent within the sun itself. It receives as well as throws off, is positive as well as negative see? and only until it becomes in such a force that it is altogether negative, as the gravitation that holds in place - for when each are lost in their relative position, these then are thrown off, as was the moon from the earth, or as is the various satellites of the various planets, as WELL as the various effects out in space.
11. (Q) Page 6 - lines 15 to 18 - ["Therefore, there could be in the solar system a dynamic reservoir or solar storage battery that would correspond to the lungs of a human system."] Is there a solar power reservoir corresponding to lungs of a human system?
(A) Solar power corresponding.
12. (Q) Page 7 - lines 16 to 20 - ["Ether may be defined as the combination of a higher plane, leading us to metaphysics, to where every consideration of the atom finally leads one."] Is this statement concerning ether correct? Will you please give a better definition?
(A) There's no BETTER definition! This is correct for, same as the statement of positive and negative forces as relating to gravitation, they act upon the individual's DEVELOPMENT, or individual's application of thought as applied TO metaphysical condition or position as is occupied from within itself. Hence, as is seen, there are (This may be an illustration for this same condition) certain CHARACTERS of disease that accentuate mental forces, or the metaphysical activity of a human body. There are others that so DULL the senses as that they become onesided, or only passive, no positive; yet a NORMAL, perfectly well and normal mind may be so active as to be considered by others in its activity as of being unbalanced, but only are they considered PECULIAR.
13. (Q) Page 8 - lines 1 to 15 - ["A mechanical device might be constructed where a vacuum even excluding ether could be drawn and maintained, developing thereby a levitating force; this similar to that force which exerts pressure upward when air is pumped into a steel barrel while submerged below surface of a medium such as water. This levitating force will be utilized in many ways, particularly in so called heavier than air ships, with the result that air navigation will be possible without the use of wings or gas."] Is this correct?
(A) This correct when the elements must be made so condensed in their form as to prevent the ether in its finer sense from being, or escaping through the various elements that are ordinarily used for creating of such vacuums. [195] will understand that! You don't get it, but [195] will! That is, the container - you can get it here - a container in which a vacuum may be made must be of such a CONDENSED element as to prevent ether from going through the atomic forces of the element itself, as is seen in that of an electric bulb - this is NOT a vacuum, only a portion! To the finite mind this is CONSIDERED as such, but were the same character - or these same conditions produced in a DIFFERENT way - THEN these may be made to BECOME an element that would act in that way and manner, see? As is seen at present, helium becomes the greater usage in containers that may be made; yet these THEMSELVES (This is working from the opposite side, see?) - but were those gases, or those metals used that the supply of helium itself becomes the container FOR the vacuum itself. see? this condensed, see? into a metal form, THEN the vacuum may be made that would lift without being lifted, see?
14. (Q) Page 9 - lines 12 to 16 - ["Pressure of metals on earth could possibly be accounted for by the breaking up of solar rays through formation of national spectroscopes during formation era of the planet earth."] Is this correct?
(A) This [is a] very good expression of that. Very good, and very well stated - that it may be possible, for it IS very well stated.
15. (Q) Give suggestion as to how to improve on the article and how to better explain positive and negative aspects of force?
(A) This as is given is VERY WELL presented, and with the various comments as will come FROM such presentation, these will develop for the body-mind that necessary. Begin with that as is expressed here.
16. (Q) With motor as now laid out, embodying new leverages and gears with same pitch, will this work as designed?
(A) When balanced properly, it will work.
17. (Q) What argument would be most conclusive to prove that sun is not hot at surface?
(A) The breaking up of the rays, just as has been described, in that it takes BACK as well as gives off, being both positive and negative.
18. (Q) What could be given as cause for appearance of corona of sun?
(A) Just as has been explained, in that the forces as are thrown off by the various activities of the forces in all - that is, the planets, the stars, and those about it that are thrown off from same in their active principle, as draws to and throws off at the same time - these may be seen as the forces which produce or cause the various effects as seen.
19. (Q) What could be given as cause for appearance of solar flames and metal coloring in these so called solar flames?
(A) THIS is as has been given.
20. We are through for the present.
Copy to [900], to be sent to [195]
" " Ass'n office
" " Datastician