下面为大家整理一篇优秀的paper代写范文- Drugs Should Not Be Completely Banned，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了禁止毒品的问题。吸毒一直被大多数人认为是犯罪行为，为了人们的健康，毒品应该被完全禁止。然而，另一些人认为完全禁止毒品的行为将会导致更多的问题。即使有禁令，人们仍然会使用毒品，完全不在乎他们是不是违法。在人类心理倒置的影响面前，禁令根本不起作用。
Introduction
Drug use is mostly regarded as an illegal issue by the great majority of human beings over years and the voice that drugs should be completely banned is louder and louder for the sake of people’s health. It is obvious that drug use does cause a series of problems toward the great majority of human beings and many people have actually become the victims of drug use, suggesting the necessity and importance to completely ban drug use except for prescription. However, other people argue that the conduct to completely ban the drug use will involve in more problems than not to prohibit it. As far as I am concerned, drugs should not be completely banned when taking the below aspects into consideration: the necessity to ban all the other vices; the effect of humans’ psychological inversion; a large sum of money spent; the necessity of massively invasive police state; the great burden of the prisons to accommodate plenty of drug dealers and drug takers; the creation of crimes as well as the ease of work stress.
http://www.51due.net/writing/research-paper/sample32349.html
Drugs Should Not Be Completely Banned
First and foremost, it is necessary to as well completely ban the use of a series of other vices if people would like to completely band the use of drugs because all the other vices can bring danger toward humans’ health the same as the drugs (Andrews Syrio. 2015). To put it more specifically, if people would like to completely ban the use of drugs like cocaine and heroin, then they have to do the same with alcohol and tobacco as well in that they can pose threat for people’s health. Also, the same case should go to countless other vices that will kill many people. It can be easily understood in that the intention to completely ban the use of drugs is for the health of the great majority of people, then it would tend to be useless if other vices will also bring harm toward the health of humans all the same. Apart from that, it is added that there are really too many kinds of existing vices as well as the approaching vices that will do harm to the health of humans, suggesting that the efforts to completely ban the drug use can actually do quite a little toward humans’ health. In addition to those drugs, food can also bring harm to the great majority of people in one way or another. Therefore if the government can make it to prevent hurting people from drugs, then it should also make efforts to prevent hurting people from food all the same (Andrews Syrio. 2015). However, it is quite impossible for people to ban all kinds of vices as will do harm toward the health of people in one way or another, leading to the complete ban toward the drug use’s being unnecessary.
Moreover, Andrews Syrio also puts forward that drugs will still be used by people even with prohibition and they are readily available to the wide public all the same, just like there is no prohibition (Andrews Syrio. 2015). People seem to do what they are not allowed to do without taking any regard of the regulations and laws established because of their having psychological inversion. The psychological inversion can be used to well account for why people will still consume the drugs even if they are forbidden by the laws not to consume them and some people will even feel that it is quite exciting and challenging for them to do unusual things as others. According to this, it can be easily predicted that the prohibition can take no function at all in front of the effect of humans’ psychological inversion. In order to better illustrate his opinion, Andrews Syrio as well states that it is not easy for people to stop consuming the drugs once they have begun to use them because of the drug addiction (Andrews Syrio. 2015). Drug addiction is absolutely a great problem for all the ones that have ever consumed drugs and they can not control themselves when the drug addiction has formed. The heavier the drug addiction for one person is, the more difficult for one to successfully get rid of drug addiction and quit consuming drugs in the due time. So a fair knowledge can be obtained that it is necessary for one to start treating drug addiction as early as possible so as to lead to the success in quitting the drug addiction at last; otherwise one may live a whole life with drugs nonstop.
I have a neighbor in China that lives quite happily with his wife and they have a lovely son. In the firstly beginning, they bought their house and they had lived for almost ten years near my house. In my mind, they are quite wealthy and they will go visiting here and there. But what is a pity to say is that the family conflict frequently occurs since the man starts consuming drugs and the man even bits his wife and son. We can always hear that this couple is quarrelling with each other and the son is crying. But luckily the man smoothly gets himself rid of the drug addiction with the help of detoxification center because his drug addiction is not very heavy. After that, this family turns to live a happy life as in the past. What is unexpected is that this man learns gambling recently and he loses a lot of money within a short time. But he does not stop gambling and he would like to win all his lost money back, resulting in his gambling outside day and night. As a result, he owes a large sum of money to others and he has no choice but to sell his house in order to pay the debt. My mother told me the other day that his family rent a small house to live at present and it is hard for them to afford to buy a new one. From this case, it can be easily found that it is not the drug use that leads to the family breakdown but the bad habit of gambling that directly causes the breakdown of my neighbor’s family. In this sense, it can be found that there is no doubt to completely ban the drug use in that other bad habits can bring detrimental influence toward people as serious as or more serious than the detrimental influence exerted by the drug use. Concerning this, the solution is to try the best to help people get rid of a series of bad habits.
The same as Andrews Syrio, Maggie Heffernan is in favor of the opinion of not completely banning the drug use. But what is different is that Maggie Heffernan has focused on a specific kind of drug called the “smart drugs” but not the general drugs from the perspective of Andrews Syrio. Detailedly speaking, Maggie Heffernan states that the use of “smart drugs” can help students to focus better so that the students who have consumed the “smart drugs” can gain a competitive edge when compared with their classmates (Maggie Heffernan. 2015). Here the “smart drugs” mentioned by Maggie Heffernan is a new kind of stimulant including Adderall, Modafinil and Ritalin and they are mainly used to treat disorders like ADHD. That is to say, the use of the “smart drugs” can help a large number of students to deal with disorders and it can enable them to perform better on study at the same time, indicating that the use of “smart drugs” is with its positive impacts toward students. But after observing the fact offered the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health that “11% of 12- to 25-year-olds use prescription drugs for non-medical purposes”, Maggie Heffernan puts forward that it is better for the students to take the “smart drugs” for medical purposes instead of taking them at a high frequency (Maggie Heffernan. 2015). Besides, Maggie Heffernan has specially illustrated that all the students have the opportunity to take the “smart drugs” so that the doubt that it will be unequal for the ones that have not taken the “smart drugs” can not stand (Maggie Heffernan. 2015). As long as the students hold that they have the necessity to take the “smart drugs”, they can just take them according to the advice of the doctors. At the last of her paper, Maggie Heffernan proposes that the behavior of the students to take the “smart drugs” in order to boost academic performance does not constitute cheating, which can well imply that she agrees with the view of not completely banning the drug use. What is a pity to say is that Maggie Heffernan does not offer the point of view toward other drugs.
Furthermore, the article published on the website of Count the Costs raises that drugs should not be completely banned for the sake of the high expenses as will be spent for the complete ban on drug use (Count the Costs. 2017). In this article, it is specified that the global “war on drugs” has been fought for 50 years while it does not contribute a lot toward preventing the long-term trend of increasing drug supply and use (Count the Costs. 2017). But what can not be neglected is that the “war on drugs” has actually cost billions on drug law enforcement on the globe, which is really high expense. Apart from the economic cost, this article has as well stated that it will call for a massively invasive police state once the drugs would like to be banned completely. It can be understood in this way that a massively invasive police state is needed for punishing all the drug users out of the large number of the drug dealers. As a matter of fact, the police group should be equipped in order to help guarantee the safety and wellbeing of the whole society and they have nothing to do with the prevention of drug dealers at all. In addition, it is apparent that it will again cost the country a lot if the country has to employ a large number of police members in order to deal with plenty of drug dealers. Obviously, the maintaining of a massively invasive police state will naturally relate to the economic cost, resulting in a higher economic expense on completely banning drug use to a certain degree.
What is more convincing for this article is that it has especially taken the America as an example and the concrete statistics provided is that “the United States is the specific country that is with the largest prison population all over the world” (Count the Costs. 2017), from which it can be readily predicted that it will be a great burden for the U.S. to accommodate that large number of prisoners. In order to make the comparison more obvious, this paper has referred to a fact that “American only accounts for 5 percent of the world’s population while it takes up 25% of the world’s prisoners” (Count the Costs. 2017). Concerning this, the large number of prisoners in America can be readily felt and it is definitely a surprising number. Maybe you may think that those prisoners have done some criminal cases so that they are put into the prison as one kind of punishment while the fact does not go in that way at all. The truth is that the great majority of American prisoners are put into prison because of drug use and drug offenses (Count the Costs. 2017). Blankly speaking, it is the complete ban on drug use that has resulted in the great burden of the prisons to accommodate that large number of prisoners out of drug use and drug offenses. Or maybe it can be put in another way that if there is no the implementation of the complete ban on drug use, then there won’t be a large number of prisoners in the prisons so that there won’t be a burden for the U.S. to accommodate countless inmates due to drug use and drug offenses. In this sense, drug use should not be completely banned.
As this paper on the website of Count the Costs has mentioned the “war on drugs” globally, the “war on drugs” has also appeared in the paper published by The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. What is mentioned by The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents is that the War on Drugs has made Mexico into a narco state (The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. 2015), which indicates that the prohibition toward drug use does not take effect in reducing the use of drugs at all. Simply speaking, the War on Drugs does not play a role in reducing the incidence of crime but instead it increases its happening. On the one hand, the drug prohibition gives rise to drug cartels and it as well creates a massive black market, which criminal gangs control and profit from. On the other hand, it is not beneficial for the young kids in poor neighborhoods to make money to live on via selling drugs if the complete ban on drug use is carried out in the reality. These two aspects will both directly and indirectly lead to the incidence of crimes, leading to some tragedies in the end. In the opposite, the black market won’t appear and the young kills won’t be put into the situation to turn to crime if the drug use is not completely banned.
Last but not the least comes that the paper named “Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace” on TUC shows that the drug and alcohol use in the workplace can help handle the work stress for the employees (TUC. 2010). Many employees will naturally produce a nervous sense and they may even experience the stress from work if they are under high intensity work for a long time. Under such situation, they can resort to either drug or alcohol in order to ease their stress more or less, contributing to their gaining energies for later work again. But what can not be ignored is that the employees cannot rely on the drug or alcohol too much and they can only turn to either drug or alcohol for help when they can not stand any more. People should choose other means to express their negative emotions like doing sports, chatting with their friends and so on, instead of turning to either drug or alcohol on their own.
Conclusion
To sum up, a reasonable conclusion can be drawn that drug should not be completely banned when taking the below few aspects into consideration: the necessity to ban all the other vices; the effect of humans’ psychological inversion; a large sum of money spent; the necessity of massively invasive police state; the great burden of the prisons to accommodate plenty of drug dealers and drug takers; the creation of crimes as well as the ease of work stress. However, each and every one should bear it in their mind that they can not rely on the drugs too much either for whatever reason and they can only consume it for the right purpose and intention. The feasible solution for the drug problem is to establish new policies to regulate the drug use of the large number of people so that people can all consume it for the right purpose and intention in the due time. Only in this way will drug use not bring detrimental impacts toward the great majority of human beings at last. It is obvious that much has to be explored toward whether drugs should be completely banned, which calls for further research.
Works Cited
Andrews Syrio. Here is Why We Should Either Legalize All Drugs or Ban Alcohol. September 17, 2015. Online available from: http://thoughtcatalog.com/andrew-syrios/2015/09/legalize-everything/.
Count the Costs. The War on Drugs: Wasting billions and undermining economies. Transform Drug Policy Foundation. 2017.
Maggie Heffernan. “Smart Drugs:” Should they be Banned? November 16, 2015. Online available from: http://haverfordclerk.com/smart-drugs-should-they-be-banned/.
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. Driving for work: Drink and Drugs. December 2015. Online available from: http://www.rospa.com/rospaweb/docs/advice-services/road-safety/employers/work-drink-drugs.pdf.
TUC. Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace. Health and safety. May 2010.
想要了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要论文代写，请关注51Due英国论文代写平台，51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构，专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作，主要业务有essay代写、paper代写、assignment代写。在这里，51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务，为广大留学生提升写作水平，帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有代写需求，可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。
51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有；未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象，51Due保留一切法律追诉权。
Introduction
Drug use is mostly regarded as an illegal issue by the great majority of human beings over years and the voice that drugs should be completely banned is louder and louder for the sake of people’s health. It is obvious that drug use does cause a series of problems toward the great majority of human beings and many people have actually become the victims of drug use, suggesting the necessity and importance to completely ban drug use except for prescription. However, other people argue that the conduct to completely ban the drug use will involve in more problems than not to prohibit it. As far as I am concerned, drugs should not be completely banned when taking the below aspects into consideration: the necessity to ban all the other vices; the effect of humans’ psychological inversion; a large sum of money spent; the necessity of massively invasive police state; the great burden of the prisons to accommodate plenty of drug dealers and drug takers; the creation of crimes as well as the ease of work stress.
http://www.51due.net/writing/research-paper/sample32349.html
Drugs Should Not Be Completely Banned
First and foremost, it is necessary to as well completely ban the use of a series of other vices if people would like to completely band the use of drugs because all the other vices can bring danger toward humans’ health the same as the drugs (Andrews Syrio. 2015). To put it more specifically, if people would like to completely ban the use of drugs like cocaine and heroin, then they have to do the same with alcohol and tobacco as well in that they can pose threat for people’s health. Also, the same case should go to countless other vices that will kill many people. It can be easily understood in that the intention to completely ban the use of drugs is for the health of the great majority of people, then it would tend to be useless if other vices will also bring harm toward the health of humans all the same. Apart from that, it is added that there are really too many kinds of existing vices as well as the approaching vices that will do harm to the health of humans, suggesting that the efforts to completely ban the drug use can actually do quite a little toward humans’ health. In addition to those drugs, food can also bring harm to the great majority of people in one way or another. Therefore if the government can make it to prevent hurting people from drugs, then it should also make efforts to prevent hurting people from food all the same (Andrews Syrio. 2015). However, it is quite impossible for people to ban all kinds of vices as will do harm toward the health of people in one way or another, leading to the complete ban toward the drug use’s being unnecessary.
Moreover, Andrews Syrio also puts forward that drugs will still be used by people even with prohibition and they are readily available to the wide public all the same, just like there is no prohibition (Andrews Syrio. 2015). People seem to do what they are not allowed to do without taking any regard of the regulations and laws established because of their having psychological inversion. The psychological inversion can be used to well account for why people will still consume the drugs even if they are forbidden by the laws not to consume them and some people will even feel that it is quite exciting and challenging for them to do unusual things as others. According to this, it can be easily predicted that the prohibition can take no function at all in front of the effect of humans’ psychological inversion. In order to better illustrate his opinion, Andrews Syrio as well states that it is not easy for people to stop consuming the drugs once they have begun to use them because of the drug addiction (Andrews Syrio. 2015). Drug addiction is absolutely a great problem for all the ones that have ever consumed drugs and they can not control themselves when the drug addiction has formed. The heavier the drug addiction for one person is, the more difficult for one to successfully get rid of drug addiction and quit consuming drugs in the due time. So a fair knowledge can be obtained that it is necessary for one to start treating drug addiction as early as possible so as to lead to the success in quitting the drug addiction at last; otherwise one may live a whole life with drugs nonstop.
I have a neighbor in China that lives quite happily with his wife and they have a lovely son. In the firstly beginning, they bought their house and they had lived for almost ten years near my house. In my mind, they are quite wealthy and they will go visiting here and there. But what is a pity to say is that the family conflict frequently occurs since the man starts consuming drugs and the man even bits his wife and son. We can always hear that this couple is quarrelling with each other and the son is crying. But luckily the man smoothly gets himself rid of the drug addiction with the help of detoxification center because his drug addiction is not very heavy. After that, this family turns to live a happy life as in the past. What is unexpected is that this man learns gambling recently and he loses a lot of money within a short time. But he does not stop gambling and he would like to win all his lost money back, resulting in his gambling outside day and night. As a result, he owes a large sum of money to others and he has no choice but to sell his house in order to pay the debt. My mother told me the other day that his family rent a small house to live at present and it is hard for them to afford to buy a new one. From this case, it can be easily found that it is not the drug use that leads to the family breakdown but the bad habit of gambling that directly causes the breakdown of my neighbor’s family. In this sense, it can be found that there is no doubt to completely ban the drug use in that other bad habits can bring detrimental influence toward people as serious as or more serious than the detrimental influence exerted by the drug use. Concerning this, the solution is to try the best to help people get rid of a series of bad habits.
The same as Andrews Syrio, Maggie Heffernan is in favor of the opinion of not completely banning the drug use. But what is different is that Maggie Heffernan has focused on a specific kind of drug called the “smart drugs” but not the general drugs from the perspective of Andrews Syrio. Detailedly speaking, Maggie Heffernan states that the use of “smart drugs” can help students to focus better so that the students who have consumed the “smart drugs” can gain a competitive edge when compared with their classmates (Maggie Heffernan. 2015). Here the “smart drugs” mentioned by Maggie Heffernan is a new kind of stimulant including Adderall, Modafinil and Ritalin and they are mainly used to treat disorders like ADHD. That is to say, the use of the “smart drugs” can help a large number of students to deal with disorders and it can enable them to perform better on study at the same time, indicating that the use of “smart drugs” is with its positive impacts toward students. But after observing the fact offered the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health that “11% of 12- to 25-year-olds use prescription drugs for non-medical purposes”, Maggie Heffernan puts forward that it is better for the students to take the “smart drugs” for medical purposes instead of taking them at a high frequency (Maggie Heffernan. 2015). Besides, Maggie Heffernan has specially illustrated that all the students have the opportunity to take the “smart drugs” so that the doubt that it will be unequal for the ones that have not taken the “smart drugs” can not stand (Maggie Heffernan. 2015). As long as the students hold that they have the necessity to take the “smart drugs”, they can just take them according to the advice of the doctors. At the last of her paper, Maggie Heffernan proposes that the behavior of the students to take the “smart drugs” in order to boost academic performance does not constitute cheating, which can well imply that she agrees with the view of not completely banning the drug use. What is a pity to say is that Maggie Heffernan does not offer the point of view toward other drugs.
Furthermore, the article published on the website of Count the Costs raises that drugs should not be completely banned for the sake of the high expenses as will be spent for the complete ban on drug use (Count the Costs. 2017). In this article, it is specified that the global “war on drugs” has been fought for 50 years while it does not contribute a lot toward preventing the long-term trend of increasing drug supply and use (Count the Costs. 2017). But what can not be neglected is that the “war on drugs” has actually cost billions on drug law enforcement on the globe, which is really high expense. Apart from the economic cost, this article has as well stated that it will call for a massively invasive police state once the drugs would like to be banned completely. It can be understood in this way that a massively invasive police state is needed for punishing all the drug users out of the large number of the drug dealers. As a matter of fact, the police group should be equipped in order to help guarantee the safety and wellbeing of the whole society and they have nothing to do with the prevention of drug dealers at all. In addition, it is apparent that it will again cost the country a lot if the country has to employ a large number of police members in order to deal with plenty of drug dealers. Obviously, the maintaining of a massively invasive police state will naturally relate to the economic cost, resulting in a higher economic expense on completely banning drug use to a certain degree.
What is more convincing for this article is that it has especially taken the America as an example and the concrete statistics provided is that “the United States is the specific country that is with the largest prison population all over the world” (Count the Costs. 2017), from which it can be readily predicted that it will be a great burden for the U.S. to accommodate that large number of prisoners. In order to make the comparison more obvious, this paper has referred to a fact that “American only accounts for 5 percent of the world’s population while it takes up 25% of the world’s prisoners” (Count the Costs. 2017). Concerning this, the large number of prisoners in America can be readily felt and it is definitely a surprising number. Maybe you may think that those prisoners have done some criminal cases so that they are put into the prison as one kind of punishment while the fact does not go in that way at all. The truth is that the great majority of American prisoners are put into prison because of drug use and drug offenses (Count the Costs. 2017). Blankly speaking, it is the complete ban on drug use that has resulted in the great burden of the prisons to accommodate that large number of prisoners out of drug use and drug offenses. Or maybe it can be put in another way that if there is no the implementation of the complete ban on drug use, then there won’t be a large number of prisoners in the prisons so that there won’t be a burden for the U.S. to accommodate countless inmates due to drug use and drug offenses. In this sense, drug use should not be completely banned.
As this paper on the website of Count the Costs has mentioned the “war on drugs” globally, the “war on drugs” has also appeared in the paper published by The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. What is mentioned by The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents is that the War on Drugs has made Mexico into a narco state (The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. 2015), which indicates that the prohibition toward drug use does not take effect in reducing the use of drugs at all. Simply speaking, the War on Drugs does not play a role in reducing the incidence of crime but instead it increases its happening. On the one hand, the drug prohibition gives rise to drug cartels and it as well creates a massive black market, which criminal gangs control and profit from. On the other hand, it is not beneficial for the young kids in poor neighborhoods to make money to live on via selling drugs if the complete ban on drug use is carried out in the reality. These two aspects will both directly and indirectly lead to the incidence of crimes, leading to some tragedies in the end. In the opposite, the black market won’t appear and the young kills won’t be put into the situation to turn to crime if the drug use is not completely banned.
Last but not the least comes that the paper named “Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace” on TUC shows that the drug and alcohol use in the workplace can help handle the work stress for the employees (TUC. 2010). Many employees will naturally produce a nervous sense and they may even experience the stress from work if they are under high intensity work for a long time. Under such situation, they can resort to either drug or alcohol in order to ease their stress more or less, contributing to their gaining energies for later work again. But what can not be ignored is that the employees cannot rely on the drug or alcohol too much and they can only turn to either drug or alcohol for help when they can not stand any more. People should choose other means to express their negative emotions like doing sports, chatting with their friends and so on, instead of turning to either drug or alcohol on their own.
Conclusion
To sum up, a reasonable conclusion can be drawn that drug should not be completely banned when taking the below few aspects into consideration: the necessity to ban all the other vices; the effect of humans’ psychological inversion; a large sum of money spent; the necessity of massively invasive police state; the great burden of the prisons to accommodate plenty of drug dealers and drug takers; the creation of crimes as well as the ease of work stress. However, each and every one should bear it in their mind that they can not rely on the drugs too much either for whatever reason and they can only consume it for the right purpose and intention. The feasible solution for the drug problem is to establish new policies to regulate the drug use of the large number of people so that people can all consume it for the right purpose and intention in the due time. Only in this way will drug use not bring detrimental impacts toward the great majority of human beings at last. It is obvious that much has to be explored toward whether drugs should be completely banned, which calls for further research.
Works Cited
Andrews Syrio. Here is Why We Should Either Legalize All Drugs or Ban Alcohol. September 17, 2015. Online available from: http://thoughtcatalog.com/andrew-syrios/2015/09/legalize-everything/.
Count the Costs. The War on Drugs: Wasting billions and undermining economies. Transform Drug Policy Foundation. 2017.
Maggie Heffernan. “Smart Drugs:” Should they be Banned? November 16, 2015. Online available from: http://haverfordclerk.com/smart-drugs-should-they-be-banned/.
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. Driving for work: Drink and Drugs. December 2015. Online available from: http://www.rospa.com/rospaweb/docs/advice-services/road-safety/employers/work-drink-drugs.pdf.
TUC. Drugs and Alcohol in the Workplace. Health and safety. May 2010.
想要了解更多英国留学资讯或者需要论文代写，请关注51Due英国论文代写平台，51Due是一家专业的论文代写机构，专业辅导海外留学生的英文论文写作，主要业务有essay代写、paper代写、assignment代写。在这里，51Due致力于为留学生朋友提供高效优质的留学教育辅导服务，为广大留学生提升写作水平，帮助他们达成学业目标。如果您有代写需求，可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。
51Due网站原创范文除特殊说明外一切图文著作权归51Due所有；未经51Due官方授权谢绝任何用途转载或刊发于媒体。如发生侵犯著作权现象，51Due保留一切法律追诉权。
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます