FOX.log

FOX新聞館ブログ版             香港・台湾・中国 NEWSコラム+不謹慎発言

台湾壹週刊、機密漏洩疑惑で強制捜査

2002-03-20 17:24:02 | メディア
『壹週刊』と言えば。香港が誇るおゲレツ大衆紙の頂点(こればっか)蘋果日報傘下の中でもひときわおゲレツな週刊誌、昨年台湾にも進出を果たし、果たすなり結婚を間近に控えた陳総統のお嬢様をオッカけまわして顰蹙、またその直後、関係あるのかないのか、ヤ系と思われる暴徒に事務所を襲撃されるなどし、アチラ台湾でもハデに活躍しておるようでございます。
 
その台湾壹週刊が今度は。台湾全土を震撼させた(震撼させるニュースの絶えない台湾ではあるが)国家安全局スキャンダルで、機密情報漏洩の疑いで強制捜査を受けております。詳しくは昨日今日の「今日の港台中ニュース速報」参照。
 
えー...あの連中、スキさえあらばドコからともなく「機密文書を持ち出す」ことなど、ハッキリ言って日常茶飯事。年中裁判に持ち込まれておりますので、連中も慣れておるコトと思います。見られてマズい情報など、香港の大衆紙の記者にだけはモレぬようにと細心の注意を配る、これ常識でございます。
 
マ台湾では出入り禁止になるかも知れませんが、斯様なハイエナ癖が功を奏した(?)スクープで、香港では元税務局長、立法会議員など多数が、辞任に追い込まれております。

最新の画像もっと見る

3 コメント

コメント日が  古い順  |   新しい順
これが発禁になった台灣《壹週刊》最新号だ! (ゾンビ@しかし印刷を続けているらしい...)
2005-10-23 20:11:46
(2002.03.21 14:54:19JST)



台灣《壹週刊》 第43期(2002.03.21号)

http://twnext.atnext.com/template/twnext/front.cfm

 

有料ですが。記事の書き出しは見られるようになってます。

 

ついでに「これが今日の蘋果日報関連記事だ!」

 

...李登輝が表紙の写真から問題の文書からナニからナニまで全部出てます。少しでも関係のある話題、無理やり引っ張ってきた話題(基本法「報道の自由」、ICAC捜査現場、同じく機密文書を入手した中國時報、果ては米国防総省ネタまで)この腕折れよとばかりに書いて書いて書きまくっています。

 

雑誌は昨夜既に一部流れているそうです。香港のウェブでも自由に見られます。発禁にした意味あるのでしょうか...

 

---

 

台北封査《壹週刊》 智英仍相信台灣開明、有新聞自由

(頭條)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&art_id=2499205&showdate=20020321

【一面写真】

http://appledaily.atnext.com/adoinfile/20020321/head_4104.jpg

掲國安局李登輝35億買外交 巨額利息私用獎賞親信

(頭條)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499208

台灣國安醜聞形同水門事件 台《壹週刊》總編輯:不怕坐牢

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499227

【写真】

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la2p11.jpg

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la2p13.jpg

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la2p16new.jpg

【表】台灣《壹週刊》大事記/台灣國安局秘密基金主要受益者

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/newx111.gif

阿扁續用國安秘密基金

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499238

台灣當局搜傳媒有先例

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499242

政論家責台灣走回頭路

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499244

《中時》爆料未遭搜査

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499246

打壓傳媒 基本法23條更受關注

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499265

【写真】

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la3p111.jpg

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la3p5.jpg

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la3p1.jpg

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la3p2.jpg

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/21la3p4new.jpg

【表】中港高層就《基本法》第二十三條言論

http://appledaily.atnext.com/images/apple-photos/640pix/20020321/Article_news/newx121.gif

侵犯新聞自由 傳媒團體震驚

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499270

《大公報》TVB《蘋果》曾被搜

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499275

【李怡專欄】非法行動對付合法掲露

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499286

《 五角大樓文件》越戰機密

(要聞)

http://appledaily.atnext.com/template/apple/art_main.cfm?sec_id=4104&showdate=20020321&art_id=2499291
返信する
機密漏洩は台湾に三重のダメージ---LA Times 1/2 (Los Angeles Times)
2005-10-24 17:49:18
Taiwan Grapples With Leaks on Official Slush Fund

Asia: Revelations could hobble island's discreet style of diplomacy. They also raise the issue of accountability.

(Los Angeles Times 2002.03.30 World)



By TYLER MARSHALL, TIMES STAFF WRITER





TAIPEI, Taiwan -- Publication of leaked documents detailing how Taiwan's leaders used a huge slush fund to buy influence and favors abroad has rocked this fledgling democracy.



The revelations focus mainly on how then-President Lee Teng-hui and a handful of trusted aides handed out money to finance diplomatic initiatives large and small--from trying to influence major decisions in Washington, to apparent espionage efforts in China, to funding research at Harvard University by a Taiwan-friendly former senior Japanese defense official.



Airing of such details is potentially devastating for Taiwan's discreet, money-driven style of diplomacy. But the existence of a largely unsupervised fund of about $100 million at the island's main intelligence arm, the National Security Bureau, also has exposed a gaping hole in accountability for public funds. A clumsy police raid to try to halt the hard-edged weekly Next from publishing the revelations early last week added to the scandal's impact, threatening further damage to Taiwan's image abroad and unleashing an intense debate at home about the limits of press freedom.



Exactly who leaked the incriminating documents and why remain a mystery. Some theorize that disgruntled intelligence officials were trying to embarrass their masters in revenge for efforts by President Chen Shui-bian's government to bring them to heel. Others believe that the move is part of a high-stakes fight between political factions jostling for advantage in the run-up to the next presidential election, in 2004.



Jimmy Lo, a member of a Taiwanese parliamentary faction loyal to Lee, blames Beijing.



"China is behind this," he said in an interview. "They want all these secret ties to be exposed."



So far, however, there are few definitive clues.



"I not only don't have a theory myself but don't even know if the intelligence community knows what's going on," said Bi-khim Hsiao, a respected member of parliament from Chen's ruling Democratic Progressive Party.



Efforts to Contain Leaks Prove Futile



Despite the government's attempt to suppress the leaks, information continues to dribble out, much of it now carried in media outside Taiwan. Thursday's editions of the Hong Kong daily Sing Tao, for example, carried details of a document detailing a September 1998 meeting in Taipei between Lee and Gerald Cassidy, head of the Washington-based political consultancy Cassidy & Associates.



Taiwan is believed to have paid several million dollars to the firm to represent its interests in Washington. According to Next magazine, the money used was interest on the slush fund account.
返信する
Taiwan Grapples With Leaks on Official Slush Fund 2/2 (Los Angeles Times)
2005-10-24 17:49:55
The scandal has compromised Taiwan's ability to continue lobbying quietly and effectively in key foreign capitals. Pursuing such a diplomatic strategy is crucial to the island, which is formally isolated from most of the world community because of pressure from Beijing. Communist China insists that Taiwan is an errant province that belongs under mainland control.



The publicity associated with the slush fund revelations is unwelcome to those who have dealings with Taipei, because they prefer their ties to be confidential to avoid risking Beijing's wrath.



"The greatest damage is the breach of mutual trust," Hsiao said. "Many of those involved in some way with the Taiwan government in a completely legal yet confidential way will now be unsure. This will have a major effect."



Noted a diplomat based in Taipei, the Taiwanese capital, who spoke on condition of anonymity: "Whoever's behind this has really hurt Taiwan. Whether they get caught and charged is almost irrelevant at this point. The bottom-line loser here is Taiwan's unofficial diplomacy."



The police raid on Next's editorial and printing facilities could also backfire diplomatically, mainly because so much of the international goodwill enjoyed by Taiwan stems from its successful transition during the last 15 years from authoritarianism to democracy.



Chen's conciliatory response to a letter from the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists protesting the magazine raid has been viewed as an attempt to ease worries about a possible press crackdown. Next executive Mark Simon condemned the raid as "a thinly veiled attempt to suppress the stench of scandal in the name of national security."



National Security Bureau officials told some members of parliament earlier in the week that computer disks containing copies of the documents detailing the slush fund activities were mailed to Next magazine; a security bureau employee; and two members of parliament from the People First Party, who had earlier accused the intelligence bureau of keeping secret funds.



The large-circulation daily China Times also obtained a copy of the documents and printed a story about their content last week. The paper was not raided by police, but its editor in chief, Huang Ching-lung is under investigation on charges of breaching national security.



Next reporter Hsieh Chung-liang faces a similar charge. He was questioned for an hour Thursday by authorities.



Assertions in the media include Next magazine's report that Lee dispatched an industrialist to lobby former Japanese Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto "with cash" to press the United States to deploy American aircraft carriers to the area in 1996 after relations between Beijing and Taipei deteriorated sharply. The Hong Kong newspaper Sing Tao reported that Hashimoto received what it called a $10,000 "gift coupon" approved by Lee.



Sing Tao also reported that Lee authorized the National Security Bureau to fund a two-year research project at Harvard undertaken by Japan's Masahiro Akiyama, a former deputy defense minister perceived to be friendly to Taiwan.



Next also reported that slush fund money went to five mainland Chinese trading companies, implying that the money was used for spying.



Many countries supplement conventional diplomacy by hiring influential experts to promote their causes and lending financial backing to supportive academic work. Neither Sing Tao nor Next claimed that foreigners named in their reports acted illegally.



Work to Establish an Oversight Committee



Those who monitor affairs here see a positive side to the scandal. They believe that the revelations are likely to put an end to slush funds and that parliament has already begun work to establish an oversight committee to monitor Taiwan's intelligence community--something the island's young democracy has never had.



There also is a move to introduce a system of classifying government documents by sensitivity, ending the long-standing practice that any document not issued to the public is viewed as secret.



"In the old days, there was no record at all of any intelligence funds because they were treated by Chiang [Kai-shek, Taiwan's first president] as his pocket money," Justice Minister Chen Ting-nan said in an interview. "There's been a lot of progress since then, and we'll see more soon."



Copyright 2002 Los Angeles Times
返信する

コメントを投稿

ブログ作成者から承認されるまでコメントは反映されません。