今まだ朝の一覧作り中でよく見てませんが。今日の一部の香港紙にデカデカと出てます。条約は国民党だからウチは関係ないとかいう事らしい。あのーでも、国交「回復」時に周恩来が角栄に約束したんじゃなかったっけ？
黨刊稱未放棄對日索償
（星島日報 2002.07.31 中國新聞）
http://www.singtao.com/yesterday/chi/0731eo01.html
中國未棄1800億美元對日索償
（明報 2002.07.31 中國）
http://full.mingpaonews.com/20020731/cab1r.htm
【参照】
カリフォルニア強制労働訴訟、日本企業の棄却請求退ける
黨刊稱未放棄對日索償
（星島日報 2002.07.31 中國新聞）
http://www.singtao.com/yesterday/chi/0731eo01.html
中國未棄1800億美元對日索償
（明報 2002.07.31 中國）
http://full.mingpaonews.com/20020731/cab1r.htm
【参照】
カリフォルニア強制労働訴訟、日本企業の棄却請求退ける
ちょっと補足します。
> 今まだ朝の一覧作り中でよく見てませんが。今日の一部の
> 香港紙にデカデカと出てます。条約は国民党だからウチは
> 関係ないとかいう事らしい。あのーでも、国交「回復」時
> に周恩来が角栄に約束したんじゃなかったっけ？
「国家」による請求権はアメリカと台湾のインボー．．．もとい、「アメリカの介入」「台湾問題」「日本との関係回復」のために１９７２年の国交回復時に放棄したが、民間人による訴訟（1800億米ドル相当）については、正当な権利があるとして積極的に支持を表明、ということらしいです。
War victims 'entitled to redress from Japanese'
（South China Morning Post 2002.07.31 China）
STAFF REPORTER
A Communist Party publication has said victims of Japan's invasion of China have the legal right to demand compensation from Tokyo.
Beijing had never declared its citizens have given up rights to compensation for war atrocities caused by the Japanese, it said.
The Party History Digest in its latest issue said US intervention, the Taiwan issue and the wish to normalise ties with Japan had caused the government to give up its reparation demands.
China decided in 1972 it would give up claiming US$120 billion (HK$936 billion) in war reparations when the two countries normalised ties. But the party publication said China had never said its war victims had to give up a fight for US$180 billion in compensation claims.
It said due to this reservation, China's war victims had the legitimate right to claim compensation according to international law.
More than 10 lawsuits have been filed in Japan against the government by former comfort women, who were victims of sexual violence, slave labourers and germ-warfare victims at the hands of the Japanese military during World War II or during Japan's invasion of China from 1931 to 1945. Most of the lawsuits have been rejected by Japanese courts.
Chinese policy vacillates between indignation at Japan's perceived lack of contrition for crimes committed and a desire to sweep the issue under the carpet to ensure smoother trade ties.