To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-10: Weekday edition,
Mr. Zelensky (surrender!) The winners of the Ukraine war are Trump and Mr. Putin. President Trump announced that President Zelensky will visit the United States on February 28th.
In fact, the Russian side had proposed to the Trump administration that the United States acquire ownership of resources such as rare earths in areas of Ukraine con-trolled by Russia. Now, the United States and Russia are in a honeymoon period.
Many believe that a pro-Russian president will be elected in the election after the war. In other words, the "substance" of resource development is "joint develop-ment" between Russia and the United States. Mr. Zelensky has no choice but to "give up".
On the 24th, Russian President Putin claimed that "we are ready to cooperate with foreign countries such as the United States to develop mineral resources," with the "four Ukrainian provinces annexed by Russia" in mind.
The Trump administration has said that "Ukraine's NATO membership is unrealis-tic," and is also opposed to sending US troops to Ukraine. It is Europe's job to monitor Ukraine after the war.
Zelensky said, "It is important that the US's support will not be interrupted" before his visit to the US on February 28. However, this time, the "security guarantee" that Ukraine is seeking in return from the US was not included.
On the 24th, US President Trump met with French President Macron at the White House and "agreed" that "European countries should play a central role" in the long-term security of post-war Ukraine.
At the beginning of the meeting, Trump said that if a ceasefire is realized, "I don't think there is a problem" with European countries sending troops to Ukraine to monitor it, and said that he has "President Putin's consent," but there seems to be a difference of opinion.
Trump pointed out that "we will also support in some way," suggesting the possibil-ity of US involvement. In short, monitoring Ukraine. I think it is also Putin's inten-tion.
We must not forget that in eastern Ukraine, neo-Nazis such as the Azov Battalion attacked Russian residents of Ukrainian nationality with weapons, leading to war.
Ukraine needs peace education and human rights education. President Trump should educate Ukrainians about democracy.
Zelensky will be expelled, but I am worried that the remnants of neo-Nazis such as the Azov Battalion will attack Russian residents in the east.
I doubt whether French monitoring troops will be sent. France is in economic crisis. I doubt whether the French people will bear the cost of maintaining peace in Ukraine.
I think that the Ukrainian army should be disbanded and "Ukraine and its borders" should be monitored by "UN troops (France, other EU countries, and China)".
Today is February 27th. The Ukrainian war is essentially over. Trump is a great man! He avoided "WW3" and created a honeymoon period with Russia.
Part 1 Citations and References
President Zelensky visits the US on the 28th, Trump over mineral resource devel-opment
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250226/k10014733271000.html
Ukrainian security to be centered on Europe, US and French leaders to coordinate efforts to send ceasefire monitoring forces
https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2025022500192&g=int
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-10: Weekday edition,
Mr. Zelensky (surrender!) The winners of the Ukraine war are Trump and Mr. Putin. President Trump announced that President Zelensky will visit the United States on February 28th.
In fact, the Russian side had proposed to the Trump administration that the United States acquire ownership of resources such as rare earths in areas of Ukraine con-trolled by Russia. Now, the United States and Russia are in a honeymoon period.
Many believe that a pro-Russian president will be elected in the election after the war. In other words, the "substance" of resource development is "joint develop-ment" between Russia and the United States. Mr. Zelensky has no choice but to "give up".
On the 24th, Russian President Putin claimed that "we are ready to cooperate with foreign countries such as the United States to develop mineral resources," with the "four Ukrainian provinces annexed by Russia" in mind.
The Trump administration has said that "Ukraine's NATO membership is unrealis-tic," and is also opposed to sending US troops to Ukraine. It is Europe's job to monitor Ukraine after the war.
Zelensky said, "It is important that the US's support will not be interrupted" before his visit to the US on February 28. However, this time, the "security guarantee" that Ukraine is seeking in return from the US was not included.
On the 24th, US President Trump met with French President Macron at the White House and "agreed" that "European countries should play a central role" in the long-term security of post-war Ukraine.
At the beginning of the meeting, Trump said that if a ceasefire is realized, "I don't think there is a problem" with European countries sending troops to Ukraine to monitor it, and said that he has "President Putin's consent," but there seems to be a difference of opinion.
Trump pointed out that "we will also support in some way," suggesting the possibil-ity of US involvement. In short, monitoring Ukraine. I think it is also Putin's inten-tion.
We must not forget that in eastern Ukraine, neo-Nazis such as the Azov Battalion attacked Russian residents of Ukrainian nationality with weapons, leading to war.
Ukraine needs peace education and human rights education. President Trump should educate Ukrainians about democracy.
Zelensky will be expelled, but I am worried that the remnants of neo-Nazis such as the Azov Battalion will attack Russian residents in the east.
I doubt whether French monitoring troops will be sent. France is in economic crisis. I doubt whether the French people will bear the cost of maintaining peace in Ukraine.
I think that the Ukrainian army should be disbanded and "Ukraine and its borders" should be monitored by "UN troops (France, other EU countries, and China)".
Today is February 27th. The Ukrainian war is essentially over. Trump is a great man! He avoided "WW3" and created a honeymoon period with Russia.
Part 1 Citations and References
President Zelensky visits the US on the 28th, Trump over mineral resource devel-opment
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250226/k10014733271000.html
Ukrainian security to be centered on Europe, US and French leaders to coordinate efforts to send ceasefire monitoring forces
https://www.jiji.com/jc/article?k=2025022500192&g=int
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
