Why did the Ukraine war happen? Biden had been preparing for a war with Russia since

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

2025-02-05: Weekday edition.
President Putin said, "If Mr. Trump had won, the Ukraine crisis might not have hap-pened." This is common knowledge in the Eastern countries. I think that's why the American people elected Trump as president.

President Putin even said, "If his victory had not been stolen in the 2020 presiden-tial election, the Ukraine crisis in 2022 would not have happened." This is an unu-sual statement.

The Biden administration's information manipulation is abnormal. It forced Russia to invade Ukraine and made Russia out to be the aggressor. It incited a crisis in the world.

President Putin once again expressed his desire to talk to "Mr. Trump," saying, "I'm ready," and said, "It depends on the decision and choice of the current US admin-istration." I think Trump is judging the situation.

Why did the Ukraine war happen? "Mr. Biden" has been preparing for war with Rus-sia since his time as vice president.

In February 2014, pro-Russian and pro-Western factions clashed, and the Maidan Revolution, a popular demonstration held in Kiev Square for several days, was shot at by police.

After that, Russia intervened, but a pro-Western government was born. President Putin opposed this, as this government was strongly conscious of joining NATO.

In 2014, pro-Russian factions launched an armed uprising in Luhansk and Donetsk, currently the most tense areas, and established an autonomous region. This was attacked by Ukrainian neo-Nazi groups, and developed into a civil war.

The following year, the Minsk Agreement was signed, but it was favorable to Russia. It granted special autonomy to the eastern region, and Russia wanted to implement the Minsk Agreement as soon as possible.

However, the Ukrainian side was reluctant to implement it, and this became the source of a major conflict.

During this time, gun battles between pro-Russian factions and the Ukrainian mili-tary and police continued in both Luhansk and Donetsk, resulting in the deaths of 14,000 people over the past eight years.

Western media continued to hide the massacre of Russian residents by neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

President Zelensky relentlessly provoked Russia. Many Western experts warned that this would lead to war. As expected, war broke out.

However, it was not widely reported in the West, including Japan.

That is why the Pope said that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a war imposed on someone. It is a well-known fact that that someone is Biden.

"Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin" should discuss the causes of the "Ukraine War." And they should reconcile.

Part 1 Citations and References
"If Trump had won, the Ukraine crisis would not have happened"... Putin's remarks may have been aimed at advancing ceasefire negotiations in his favor, with some criticizing the "unusual" fraud
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20250125-OYT1T50028/
Read it to understand the story: Background to the Ukraine crisis: What is President Putin afraid of? - Part 2 https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_international/articles/000245622.html

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp