本篇英国essay代写范文-First Impression under Halo Effec讲了光环效应近年来存在于人们的思想中,吸引力在光环效应下的某些特质和有利品质促使人们对别人进行评价。人们有一个趋势,积极评论他们感受和反对的有魅力的人物。本篇英国essay代写由51due英国代写平台整理,供大家参考阅读。
Abstract
The study concentrates on whether halo effect exists in people’s mind in recent years or not and explore how attractiveness make differences under the halo effect. The current study predicted that a) The woman in Photo A was perceived more attractive than another women in Photo B, b) The participants would give better and higher comments to the other subordinate traits of attractive person than the less attractive person, c) wearing glasses would make the same person become more intelligent in the eyes of participants. The current study collected participant ratings on 22 traits, but only included 5 of those traits in the analysis. Data were collated and analyzed by the teaching team using SPSS Statistics. T-tests as the independent measures t-tests to check out results whether significant or not. The results suggest that halo effect exists in people’s mind in recent years and attractiveness as certain traits and favorable quality under the halo effect promotes people to rate others. People have a trend to give active comment on attractive person they perceived and vice verse.
Key Words :Halo effect, attractiveness, first impression, quick appraisal
Introduction
Edward Thorndike, a famous American psychologist, firstly put forward to halo effect in the 1920s. The halo effect belongs to the psychology category and it is one of the classic psychology phenomenons. Halo effect refers to a kind of exaggerated social impression forms in the process of interpersonal interaction. It just likes the light of sun and moon expands to the surroundings on the effect of clouds and forms a kind of aura effect. It usually performs the initial impression of a person to another which depends on his general view. As a matter of fact, halo effect owns close relationship with the first impression.
Compared with other peripheral traits in the interactions, physically appearance as an certain trait in quick appraisal is far easier to discern people’s other traits to gain the whole impression in the first impression. Judging a person’s qualities and personalities by glancing at others’ physically appearance help people shortly identify others in interactions. Besides, people prefer to believing what they saw rather than spending long time to learn about others thoughtfully due to the former perceptive process is more convenient. Attractiveness as a favorable quality of the physically appearance make people trust that an attractive person naturally owns other active traits such as successful, ambitious, intelligence and popular. The less attractive person may perceive to owns some undesirable traits. This psychological phenomenon was the famous halo effect. However, halo effect can cause people to make inaccurate and subject impression in the process of perceiving others’ traits. Asch, Dion, Harries and other authors had explored halo effect before 21 century. Halo effect is available among people in modern society. Leaning about and exploring this social phenomenon for studying social psychology of individual and group is very meaningful. The current study designed to determine whether halo effect exists in people’s mind in recent years or not and explore how attractiveness make differences under the halo effect.
First of all, the current study put forward an argument that halo effect exist in people’s mind in recent years and halo effect are likely to push people to use stereotype subconsciously to comment other and form basic impression. The attractiveness as an important and favorable quality which are easier discern in the interaction, so it often be used to ascertain traits to depend on other traits of a person. The partly observation and conclusion may not accurate and practical but most of people prefer to using it rather than spending longer time to observe a person and gain a whole impression.
Since the halo effect raised by Thorndike, a good deal of worldwide psychologists aimed at this interesting psychological phenomenon made lots of researches and investigations to consider and explore it thoughtfully. Central traits affect the comment on other traits. Attractiveness as a certain traits influences people judgment on a person’s other traits.( Asch, 1946 p. 258). In What Is Beautiful Is Good, Dion found that stereotype not only existed on attractive people but also existed less attractive person (Dion, 1972 p. 290). Based on Dion research, Harris found that the same less attractive person wore glasses also can as attractiveness to affect other traits (Harries, 1982 p. 516 ). The past research was very detailed and rich, but social psychology developed along with the progress of human civilization and the changes of social environment. Halo effect as one of social psychology can not limit at the previous work but bases on the previous work to explore the changes of halo effect combined with characteristics of the times. Here, the current study bases on previous research and puts forward to three hypotheses. Then the current study would confirm whether these hypotheses supported or not.
Method
Participants
There were 598 participants who were all first year Deakin psych students voluntarily took part in the study. The sum of them were 598, the ratio of participants were 116:482 male to female.Their age rang of seventeen to seventy-one.The standard deviation is equal to 8.91 years and the means is equal to 23.74 years.
Materials
There was a questionnaire which provided to the participants. The questionnaire consists of three photos and respectively named Photo A, Photo B and Photo C. The questionnaire contained a facial image of a fictional person called Linda and asked the participants to fill out a questionnaire regarding the image.
Procedure
The photo named Linda would be provided for the participants of the study. They make quick appraisal base on the first impression of the photo. The left list of the table are some different traits of Linda, and participants should give the accordingly marks to describe their impression on Linda. There are total 22 questions on the questionnaire but in order to make more accurate and scientific statistics and analysis, the current study only aim at five traits ( Attractive, Ambitious, Successful, Intelligent and Popular).
Results
Mean ratings on socially desirable traits for the three photos are presented below. See Table 1 for Photo A and B ratings, and Table 2 for Photo B and C ratings.
The research question1 was that see if the women in Photo A in the impression of participants would regarded as more attractive than another women in Photo B. To solve this question, the minimummark is one point meaning not at all, and maximum mark is seven point meaning a lot. Mean ratings for attractiveness are included in Table 1 which is presented below. If Photo A was rated as being more attractive it allowed the current study to further rate Photo A and Photo B on other socially desirable traits. The t-tests as independent measures aim to determine whether the results of study were significant or not.
The research question 2 was that see if the participants would give better and higher comments to the other subordinate traits of attractive person than the less attractive person. To answer the second question the current study compared the results of Photo A and Photo B on four additional socially desirable traits. These were Popular, Ambitious, Successful and Intelligent. Mean ratings are presented in Table 1 below. The t-tests as independent measures aim to determine whether the results of study were significant or not.
Table 1
Mean Difference Scores for Photo A and Photo B on Attractiveness, Popularity, Ambition, Success, and Intelligence
Photo APhoto B
TraitMSDMSD
Attractive5.261.103.681.43
Popular4.461.023.271.00
Ambitious5.310.984.711.23
Successful5.510.884.671.06
Intelligent5.910.925.310.97
From Table 1, the current study could find that the mean scores of Photo A is 5.26 and the mean scores of Photo B is 3.68. Hence, the former is higher than the latter. That means the woman in Photo A was perceived more attractive than another women in Photo B among participants’ judgment. Consequently, the current study made use of t-tests as independent measures to determine the result was significant or not. Attractive: t(351) = 12.31, p<.05. The t-tests confirmed that the difference between the data in Table 1 was significant. In other words, there is a difference in the mean score on the DV for the two groups. Let us return the previous hypotheses. The first hypotheses assumed the woman in Photo A was perceived more attractive than another women in Photo B. The means for each group are significant results in the direction the current study predicted. Therefore, the first hypothesis is supported.
Let us look back the Table 1 other four traits, the current study uses an independent measures t-test to see if the result was significant. Popular: t(404) = 11.84, p<.05. Ambitious: t(359) = 5.46, p<.05. Success: t(363) = 8.60, p<.05. Intelligent (Photo A vs Photo B): t(404) = 6.49, p<.05.
There were differences between the Photo A group mean scores and the Photo B group mean scores in regards to popular, ambitious, intelligent and successful. The current study made use of t-tests as independent measures to determine that the difference between the data in Table 1 was significant.
The second hypothesis assumed that participants would give better and higher comments to the other subordinate traits of attractive person than the less attractive person. According to the survey data in the Table 1, the current study could observe that Photo A was perceived to be more attractive than the Photo B. As a result, the mean scores of popular of Photo A were 4.46 which higher than the Photo B which was 3.27. The mean scores of ambitious of Photo B were 5.31 which higher than the Photo B which was 4.71. The mean scores of successful of Photo B were 5.51 which higher than the Photo B which was 4.67. The mean scores of intelligent of Photo B were 5.91 which higher than the Photo B which were 5.31. Therefore, the current study could said that participants would give better and higher comments to the other subordinate traits of attractive person than the less attractive person. And the second hypothesis is supported.
Table 2
Mean Difference Scores for Photos B and C on Intelligence
Intelligence
PhotoMSD
Photo B5.310.95
Photo C5.870.97
From Table 2, the current study could find that the mean scores of Photo C is 5.87 and the mean scores of Photo B is 5.31. Hence, the former is higher than the latter. That means wearing glasses would make the same person become more intelligent in the eyes of participants. Consequently, the current study uses an independent measures t-test to see if the result was significant. Intelligent (Photo B vs Photo C): t(377) = 5.74, p<.05. The current study made use of t-tests as independent measures to determine that the difference between the data in Table 2 was significant. The third hypotheses assumed that wearing glasses would make the same person become more intelligent in the eyes of participants. The means for each group are significant results in the direction the current study predicted. Therefore, the third hypothesis is supported.
Discussion
The study aims to determine whether halo effect exists in people’s mind in recent years or not and explore how attractiveness make differences under the halo effect. In terms of results, the three hypotheses supported. That indicates that halo effect is based on the previous research exists in people’s mind now and people put the attractiveness as certain traits to make influence other traits of a person.
Compared with those other past surveys, the current study had more participants and more personality attributes. That could gain relatively objective and comprehensive survey data to analysis the relationship between attractive and halo effect. The participants past research finished before 21 century and the current study made in 2016, the times,social environment and people’s psychology are different from people now. The degree of halo effect maybe changes.
The participants were all ll first year Deakin psych students who learned about more or less social psychology, and they were males and females aged from 17-71 years, but the stereotypes also exist on their mind, and attractiveness as central traits have a trend to affect the person to appraise others’ traits of first impression The limitations in the current study can affect the result of current study. The way of thinking, perception and psychology exists a little difference. The percentages of men and women in the current study were one in fourth. That means females are far more than males. Although the participants saw the same materials, the current study could not exclude the probability that when the numbers of males increase to as the females, the results would appear another conditions. The degree of halo effect may strengthen or weaken. Because the material are females, and if the current study changed females into males, the results may appear another phenomenon.
In a word, Halo effect is available in recent years and halo effect are likely to push people to use stereotype subconsciously to comment other and form basic impression. The attractiveness as an important and favorable quality which are easier discern in the interaction, so it often be used to as certain traits to depend on other traits of a person. The partly observation and conclusion may not accurate and practical but most of people prefer to using it rather than spending longer time to observe a person and gain a whole impression. The future research need to concentrate on whether people would reconstruct impression or not when they find that their first impression and judgment are not accurate. Whether people would consciously appraise others avoid or resist the halo effect at the next time interactions or not.
Reference list
Asch, S.E. F orming i mpressions of p ersonality. Journal of Abnormal and S ocial Psychology (1946) , 41 , 258 - 290.
Dion, K aren ., Berscheid, E llen . , & Walster, E laine . (1972). W hat is beautiful is g ood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), pp. 285 - 290.
Harris, M.B., Harris, R.J., & Bochner, S. (1982). Fat, four - eyed and female: stereotypes of obesity, glasses and gender. Journal of Applied Psychology, v 12, 503 - 513.
要想成绩好,英国论文得写好,51due英国代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯,专业辅导,还为你提供专业英国essay代写,paper代写,report代写,需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due吧。—Ace