To everyone in the world's media

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-14: Weekday edition,
[Nippon TV: Sunday Morning] American cars don't sell in Japan because they have poor fuel economy. Is the "non-tariff barrier" that Trump is talking about a false ac-cusation? This is a hot topic. "I" think we should manufacture in America and export from America to Japan and the world.
There is a "big fuss" in Japan. President Trump has proposed a "25% automobile tariff." Currently, it is kept at 2.5%, so it will be 10 times that. What will happen if this is applied to Japan?
For example, if you export a 4 million yen car to America, if the tariff is 2.5%, it will be 100,000 yen, but if it is 25%, it will rise to 1 million yen, and if you pass it on to the price as it is, it will be expensive and Japanese cars will be difficult to sell in America. There are a lot of arguments like this. It's strange.
I support "President Trump's" 25% tariff. Never make exceptions. Even if it is an American company, a 25% tariff should be imposed on imports from overseas.
As President Trump claims, to avoid tariffs, they should produce in "America". All companies are fair. I think cars produced in America are probably the cheapest.
I think all car companies that produce in Canada and Mexico will produce in America. Japanese and Korean car companies should switch from exporting to America to producing in America.
Companies that complain that switching to production in America will increase manufacturing costs because of high "wages" should demand that the Trump ad-ministration create a "special zone on the Mexican border".
Companies will relocate their factories to the "special zone on the Mexican border". Workers will hire "temporary immigrants" as "low-wage workers".
Companies are "delighted" because the wages of temporary immigrants are "signif-icantly cheaper" than those in "China and Mexico". Until now, there have been no "special zones" in the United States, so they built factories overseas.
Of course, Japanese car companies will also reduce production in Japan and relo-cate their factories to the "special zone on the Mexican border". And some of them will be exported to Japan.
Japanese and Korean car companies will produce cars in the "special zone on the Mexican border" and export them to the whole world. By hiring low-wage workers, they will be more competitive than BRICS car companies.
Then China and European countries will impose 25% or 50% tariffs on American cars and restrict imports. President Trump will ask, "What will we do?"
Companies that build factories in the "special zone on the Mexican border" should build two factories. One factory faces the Caribbean Sea. This factory exports to Pacific Rim countries such as Europe, Africa, and South America.
The other factory faces the Pacific Ocean. This factory exports to Pacific Rim coun-tries such as China, Japan, the Far East, Oceania, and South America.
Japan has set itself the goal of becoming a "tourism-based nation." Immigrants will not come to Japan, where human rights violations by the judiciary are severe. The Japanese, who built the second largest GDP in the world, will soon be gone from the "world."
Part 1 Citations and References
American cars don't sell in Japan because they have good fuel economy. Is Trump's complaint about "non-tariff barriers" a false accusation? If a 25% tariff is imposed on cars, it will inevitably have an impact on the Japanese economy [Sunday Morn-ing] |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDUQRbTz4Vc
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-14: Weekday edition,
[Nippon TV: Sunday Morning] American cars don't sell in Japan because they have poor fuel economy. Is the "non-tariff barrier" that Trump is talking about a false ac-cusation? This is a hot topic. "I" think we should manufacture in America and export from America to Japan and the world.
There is a "big fuss" in Japan. President Trump has proposed a "25% automobile tariff." Currently, it is kept at 2.5%, so it will be 10 times that. What will happen if this is applied to Japan?
For example, if you export a 4 million yen car to America, if the tariff is 2.5%, it will be 100,000 yen, but if it is 25%, it will rise to 1 million yen, and if you pass it on to the price as it is, it will be expensive and Japanese cars will be difficult to sell in America. There are a lot of arguments like this. It's strange.
I support "President Trump's" 25% tariff. Never make exceptions. Even if it is an American company, a 25% tariff should be imposed on imports from overseas.
As President Trump claims, to avoid tariffs, they should produce in "America". All companies are fair. I think cars produced in America are probably the cheapest.
I think all car companies that produce in Canada and Mexico will produce in America. Japanese and Korean car companies should switch from exporting to America to producing in America.
Companies that complain that switching to production in America will increase manufacturing costs because of high "wages" should demand that the Trump ad-ministration create a "special zone on the Mexican border".
Companies will relocate their factories to the "special zone on the Mexican border". Workers will hire "temporary immigrants" as "low-wage workers".
Companies are "delighted" because the wages of temporary immigrants are "signif-icantly cheaper" than those in "China and Mexico". Until now, there have been no "special zones" in the United States, so they built factories overseas.
Of course, Japanese car companies will also reduce production in Japan and relo-cate their factories to the "special zone on the Mexican border". And some of them will be exported to Japan.
Japanese and Korean car companies will produce cars in the "special zone on the Mexican border" and export them to the whole world. By hiring low-wage workers, they will be more competitive than BRICS car companies.
Then China and European countries will impose 25% or 50% tariffs on American cars and restrict imports. President Trump will ask, "What will we do?"
Companies that build factories in the "special zone on the Mexican border" should build two factories. One factory faces the Caribbean Sea. This factory exports to Pacific Rim countries such as Europe, Africa, and South America.
The other factory faces the Pacific Ocean. This factory exports to Pacific Rim coun-tries such as China, Japan, the Far East, Oceania, and South America.
Japan has set itself the goal of becoming a "tourism-based nation." Immigrants will not come to Japan, where human rights violations by the judiciary are severe. The Japanese, who built the second largest GDP in the world, will soon be gone from the "world."
Part 1 Citations and References
American cars don't sell in Japan because they have good fuel economy. Is Trump's complaint about "non-tariff barriers" a false accusation? If a 25% tariff is imposed on cars, it will inevitably have an impact on the Japanese economy [Sunday Morn-ing] |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDUQRbTz4Vc
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp