To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-06: Weekday edition,
"Special Zones" are a great "business model" that allows "developed countries" to "prosper" without war. I have proposed the "Algerian Special Zone", "Mexican Bor-der Special Zone", and "Philippine Special Zone" as major special zones to the world.
I argue that "refugees and illegal immigrants" should not be accepted in the "home countries" of "developed countries". This is "what everyone is saying". I believe they should be accepted in "overseas special zones".
In Europe, "countries that do not accept immigrants" should "jointly" build an "Alge-rian Special Zone". "Illegal immigrants and refugees" aiming for "Europe" should be accepted in the "special zone" as "temporary immigrants" and employed as "low-wage workers".
Have the "far-right" parties made a breakthrough? A big breakthrough! In Germany, amid growing concerns about the worsening security situation, political parties have put forward strict refugee and immigration policies ahead of the February 23 general election for the Bundestag (lower house), and far-right parties are expected to make a breakthrough. (February 17)
This incident is the responsibility of the "German government that accepted immi-grants." On February 13, a car crashed into a labor union demonstration in Munich, southern Germany, killing a mother and child and injuring about 40 people. Local police arrested the Afghan man (24) who was driving.
The German people should refuse to accept "immigrants and refugees." Political parties in Germany that accept "immigrants and refugees" should be dissolved. Ac-cording to the German news agency DPA, the man's refugee application was reject-ed, but his deportation was postponed due to his young age, etc.
"European" governments say they cannot employ "low-wage workers" unless they accept "refugees and illegal immigrants." The government does not accept the people's "anti-immigration" sentiment. The government "does not listen to my pro-posals." Such parties should be dissolved.
In the "home countries" such as Germany and France, "high value-added parts and materials are produced. Assembly and other processes are carried out by tempo-rary immigrants in the "Algerian Special Zone". In other words, division of labor is necessary.
In the "Algerian Special Zone", "low-wage" workers are employed with "latest equipment", so production can be cheaper than Chinese products. Ultimately, a system will be established that can beat Chinese products at the product level.
Products are exported from the "Algerian Special Zone" to "China, Japan, the United States, etc." In "China and the United States," "products cheaper than Chinese products" become popular.
If product exports from the "Algerian Special Zone" increase, "parts and materials from Europe" exported to the "Algerian Special Zone" through the supply chain will increase. Europe will prosper.
"Europeans" do not coexist with "temporary immigrants". "However", European countries indirectly "employ" "illegal immigrants and refugees". Isn't that wonder-ful?
European citizens should appeal to their governments to create an "Algerian special zone." Companies should also appeal to create an "Algerian special zone." Compa-nies will finally be able to "make a profit."
"Illegal immigrants and refugees" have "low wages." "Food, clothing, shelter, medi-cal care, and education" are free. This is because the "cooperative" that runs the special zone covers these costs. For details, see "Past Posts and Articles."
Part 1 Citations and References
A series of violent crimes committed by refugees in Germany. Will the "far right" make a breakthrough in the general election?
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250217/k00/00m/030/120000c
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-03-06: Weekday edition,
"Special Zones" are a great "business model" that allows "developed countries" to "prosper" without war. I have proposed the "Algerian Special Zone", "Mexican Bor-der Special Zone", and "Philippine Special Zone" as major special zones to the world.
I argue that "refugees and illegal immigrants" should not be accepted in the "home countries" of "developed countries". This is "what everyone is saying". I believe they should be accepted in "overseas special zones".
In Europe, "countries that do not accept immigrants" should "jointly" build an "Alge-rian Special Zone". "Illegal immigrants and refugees" aiming for "Europe" should be accepted in the "special zone" as "temporary immigrants" and employed as "low-wage workers".
Have the "far-right" parties made a breakthrough? A big breakthrough! In Germany, amid growing concerns about the worsening security situation, political parties have put forward strict refugee and immigration policies ahead of the February 23 general election for the Bundestag (lower house), and far-right parties are expected to make a breakthrough. (February 17)
This incident is the responsibility of the "German government that accepted immi-grants." On February 13, a car crashed into a labor union demonstration in Munich, southern Germany, killing a mother and child and injuring about 40 people. Local police arrested the Afghan man (24) who was driving.
The German people should refuse to accept "immigrants and refugees." Political parties in Germany that accept "immigrants and refugees" should be dissolved. Ac-cording to the German news agency DPA, the man's refugee application was reject-ed, but his deportation was postponed due to his young age, etc.
"European" governments say they cannot employ "low-wage workers" unless they accept "refugees and illegal immigrants." The government does not accept the people's "anti-immigration" sentiment. The government "does not listen to my pro-posals." Such parties should be dissolved.
In the "home countries" such as Germany and France, "high value-added parts and materials are produced. Assembly and other processes are carried out by tempo-rary immigrants in the "Algerian Special Zone". In other words, division of labor is necessary.
In the "Algerian Special Zone", "low-wage" workers are employed with "latest equipment", so production can be cheaper than Chinese products. Ultimately, a system will be established that can beat Chinese products at the product level.
Products are exported from the "Algerian Special Zone" to "China, Japan, the United States, etc." In "China and the United States," "products cheaper than Chinese products" become popular.
If product exports from the "Algerian Special Zone" increase, "parts and materials from Europe" exported to the "Algerian Special Zone" through the supply chain will increase. Europe will prosper.
"Europeans" do not coexist with "temporary immigrants". "However", European countries indirectly "employ" "illegal immigrants and refugees". Isn't that wonder-ful?
European citizens should appeal to their governments to create an "Algerian special zone." Companies should also appeal to create an "Algerian special zone." Compa-nies will finally be able to "make a profit."
"Illegal immigrants and refugees" have "low wages." "Food, clothing, shelter, medi-cal care, and education" are free. This is because the "cooperative" that runs the special zone covers these costs. For details, see "Past Posts and Articles."
Part 1 Citations and References
A series of violent crimes committed by refugees in Germany. Will the "far right" make a breakthrough in the general election?
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250217/k00/00m/030/120000c
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます