[Trump's America: The Battle Within] King Donald Swears Revenge

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

2025-01-29: Weekday edition.
Trump posted, "Lawfare has never happened in the United States in the past. It must never happen again." "We" think that's right.

The media says that "Trump and conservatives" like to use "Lawfare" when they criticize the weaponization of the judiciary against political opponents. They are still critical of Trump.

In a case where Trump was allegedly handling hush money for an extramarital af-fair, the court made an unusual decision not to imprison him or impose a fine, but the guilty verdict was not overturned. I think Trump was "frustrated" by the verdict.

I think that the American judiciary is just as crazy as Japan's. He "fabricated" the reason for handling funds for "hush money for an extramarital affair," which is not a crime, and made it a "crime." It's too "arbitrary."

"Retribution" was Trump's central message in the presidential election. He repeat-edly said that he would investigate and punish those he considered enemies. If Trump does not "retaliate," the number of "victims" will only increase. He should "retaliate in a just way."

Trump repeatedly said that he would investigate and punish those he considered enemies. Because it is a "fact" that the United States is being manipulated by the "deep state," a collusion between elites and bureaucracy.

Trump also mentioned conspiracy theories and declared, "The enemy within is more dangerous than Russia or China." I think many Americans share Trump's opin-ion.

The case of the alleged fraudulent handling of hush money for an affair is the same as the Japanese judiciary saying that Carlos Ghosn (formerly of Nissan) "wrote" a "false securities report" for his executive compensation.

The "University of Tokyo professor" who appeared as a witness was not a "false "statement." He testified that he "did not" make any "statements." The prosecution says that not filling out the form is a crime. In the US, this is not a crime.

I don't think that the US election system, postal voting, is a fair election system. Japanese people living in the US can vote by mail for the election of Diet members, but in that case, it is by registered mail.

In the "attack on the US Capitol," Trump shouted "election fraud" against this back-ground. However, he did not "incite" anyone. This can be confirmed by the video. However, the government treated Trump as a criminal.

President Trump should have the new "FBI director" reinvestigate the truth of the "attack." America should not be a country that "fabricates" "criminals." He should make America a "democratic nation."

Trump's "assassination attempt" has "plunged" the world into fear. It is "clear" that the "deep state" tried to assassinate the "presidential candidate." He should find the "shadow criminals."

The biggest fear is that the "Ukraine War" was fabricated. The Pope asserts that "someone forced Russia to invade Ukraine." Trump should reveal who "someone" is. Someone should be tried for "crimes against peace."

Part 1 Citations and References
[Trump's America: The War Within] <Part 1> "King Donald" Swears Retaliation
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/shimen/20250118-OYT9T50030/

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/