The shift to electric vehicles has destroyed the automobile industry in Europe and t

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

2025-01-10: Weekday edition.
The "EV shift" will destroy the European and American automobile industry. Mr. Trump should "suppress" the spread of "EVs" from an "environmental perspective". Therefore, a "weight tax" should be imposed on "EVs" based on Japan's "weight tax".

The main reason that EVs are heavy is because the batteries that run the cars are heavy. According to the NPO Asia Mold Industry Forum at a supporter meeting in September 2021, "the average vehicle weight is about 240 to 460 kg heavier than cars of the same class."

It has also been pointed out that the process of mining and manufacturing large amounts of natural resources such as lithium and nickel emits a large amount of CO2, which cannot be ignored compared to the amount of CO2 emitted during driv-ing.

However, there is also the problem that the weight of the car itself accelerates wear on the road surface and tires. Mr. Trump should appeal to the world about this point.

As a result, road maintenance and tire changes will be more frequent. According to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, the maximum load on expressways is proportional to the 12th power of the axle load (weight). In other words, if the weight doubles, the burden becomes 4096 times greater.

Regarding tire wear, the American newspaper "Miami Herald" reported that tires wear out 4 to 5 times faster than engine vehicles.

There are also several articles in Japan that have investigated tire wear, and it seems that tires are at least 1.5 times more likely to wear out than engine vehicles.

As a result, tire replacements have increased, and it is said that the environmental burden is high in areas other than fuel.

Regarding the weight of EVs, the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has expressed concern in 2023 that the weight of EVs will increase the risk of seri-ous injury and death to road users such as pedestrians.

In addition, the University of Nebraska-Lincoln also conducted a collision experi-ment with an EV against a guardrail in October 2023, and the results showed that the impact energy when an EV collides with a roadside fence may be 20 to 50% higher than that of an engine vehicle.

Japan introduced the weight tax 53 years ago in 1971. The initial reason was that "heavy cars driving on the roads cause roads to deteriorate. To compensate for this defect."

In Japan, the automobile weight tax was "for building roads," but in 2009, the law was amended to make it a general revenue source that can be used for anything.

Trump should build a "truly environmentally friendly automobile society" by impos-ing a weight tax on EVs. Trump, don't give in to the conspiracy theories about EVs!

The revenue from this weight tax should be used to accelerate the development of hydrogen vehicles. I think that hydrogen vehicles themselves are "almost com-plete." The problem is the hydrogen supply system.

I propose a method of compressing hydrogen and filling it into "cartridges," and then "replacing the cartridges" at existing "G/S." This method protects jobs and makes everyone happy.

Part 1 Citations and References
"EVs are heavy!" Why? Some people point out that the weight of EVs increases the environmental burden. 
https://trafficnews.jp/post/131488
Give drivers their money back! The "automobile weight tax" was meant to build roads,
https://www.wjsm.co.jp/article/public-Economy/a562

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp