To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-26: Weekday edition,
On his first day in office, US President Trump called North Korea a "nuclear power" and boasted about his relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. As ex-pected of President Trump. It's clear and easy to understand.
It appears that he has virtually acknowledged North Korea's nuclear status and sent an invitation to Chairman Kim to begin new negotiations, which seems to be causing a big stir, especially in South Korea.
The expression "nuclear powers" mentioned by President Trump does not refer to the five countries that are legally permitted to possess nuclear weapons under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) regime, but rather to countries where nuclear possession is de facto tolerated.
Until now, there has been no precedent for a US president to explicitly refer to North Korea as a "nuclear power". This means that the second Trump administra-tion is sending a strong signal to North Korea that it is willing to negotiate without the premise of denuclearization.
South Korea has expressed a position that emphasizes that "as long as the NPT ex-ists, North Korea cannot obtain the status of a nuclear power." Politicians and bu-reaucrats in South Korea and Japan seem to have dementia.
The Trump administration has recognized North Korea as a nuclear power. I think this is a realistic response that is typical of Trump. North Korea should act respon-sibly as a nuclear power.
The Trump administration should also be realistic about how to deal with Taiwan. The United States should recognize Taiwan as part of China and clarify "One China".
If the Trump administration recognizes Taiwan as Chinese territory, I think it should "sever diplomatic relations" with the Taiwanese government. Travel between the two countries should be conducted as "part of China".
Therefore, the United States needs an "alternative" to "Taiwan" in terms of its se-curity policy. That is why I propose the "Philippine Special Zone" as an "alternative" to "Taiwan".
The "Philippine Special Zone" is jointly operated by the "UK, the US, and the Philip-pines". It is mainly an "overseas factory zone" for the "UK and the US".
The Trump administration should consult with the Philippine government and sta-tion US and British troops in the Philippines. The pretext is to protect the "Philippine Special Zone".
Based on this position, I propose that Palestinians in the Gaza Strip be allowed to move to the "Philippine Special Zone" if they so wish.
President Trump should make a deal with President Xi Jinping. China should be al-lowed to integrate Taiwan in exchange for giving up its hegemony over the South China Sea and the Senkaku Islands.
Territorial issues are the core of China. But this is what has caused the conflict. Trump should resolve the conflict between China and Japan, the Philippines, Vi-etnam, etc.
President Trump is a perceptive president who finds realistic solutions. I think Pres-ident Xi Jinping would accept President Trump's deal.
I think President Trump can create a G3MA with the United States, Russia, and Chi-na by making a deal with President Putin on the Ukraine issue and President Xi Jinping on the Taiwan issue. He would definitely win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Part 1 Citations and References
President Trump's statement that "North Korea is a nuclear power" is a negotiating signal to Chairman Kim...South Korea is confused
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d3f89c943dff0cd6c2027273331244163c0e9e2f
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-26: Weekday edition,
On his first day in office, US President Trump called North Korea a "nuclear power" and boasted about his relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. As ex-pected of President Trump. It's clear and easy to understand.
It appears that he has virtually acknowledged North Korea's nuclear status and sent an invitation to Chairman Kim to begin new negotiations, which seems to be causing a big stir, especially in South Korea.
The expression "nuclear powers" mentioned by President Trump does not refer to the five countries that are legally permitted to possess nuclear weapons under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) regime, but rather to countries where nuclear possession is de facto tolerated.
Until now, there has been no precedent for a US president to explicitly refer to North Korea as a "nuclear power". This means that the second Trump administra-tion is sending a strong signal to North Korea that it is willing to negotiate without the premise of denuclearization.
South Korea has expressed a position that emphasizes that "as long as the NPT ex-ists, North Korea cannot obtain the status of a nuclear power." Politicians and bu-reaucrats in South Korea and Japan seem to have dementia.
The Trump administration has recognized North Korea as a nuclear power. I think this is a realistic response that is typical of Trump. North Korea should act respon-sibly as a nuclear power.
The Trump administration should also be realistic about how to deal with Taiwan. The United States should recognize Taiwan as part of China and clarify "One China".
If the Trump administration recognizes Taiwan as Chinese territory, I think it should "sever diplomatic relations" with the Taiwanese government. Travel between the two countries should be conducted as "part of China".
Therefore, the United States needs an "alternative" to "Taiwan" in terms of its se-curity policy. That is why I propose the "Philippine Special Zone" as an "alternative" to "Taiwan".
The "Philippine Special Zone" is jointly operated by the "UK, the US, and the Philip-pines". It is mainly an "overseas factory zone" for the "UK and the US".
The Trump administration should consult with the Philippine government and sta-tion US and British troops in the Philippines. The pretext is to protect the "Philippine Special Zone".
Based on this position, I propose that Palestinians in the Gaza Strip be allowed to move to the "Philippine Special Zone" if they so wish.
President Trump should make a deal with President Xi Jinping. China should be al-lowed to integrate Taiwan in exchange for giving up its hegemony over the South China Sea and the Senkaku Islands.
Territorial issues are the core of China. But this is what has caused the conflict. Trump should resolve the conflict between China and Japan, the Philippines, Vi-etnam, etc.
President Trump is a perceptive president who finds realistic solutions. I think Pres-ident Xi Jinping would accept President Trump's deal.
I think President Trump can create a G3MA with the United States, Russia, and Chi-na by making a deal with President Putin on the Ukraine issue and President Xi Jinping on the Taiwan issue. He would definitely win the Nobel Peace Prize.
Part 1 Citations and References
President Trump's statement that "North Korea is a nuclear power" is a negotiating signal to Chairman Kim...South Korea is confused
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/d3f89c943dff0cd6c2027273331244163c0e9e2f
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
