To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-25: Weekday edition,
As expected of President Trump! "Ukraine may become Russia someday," Trump blurted out in a TV interview. The Ukraine war is a war that Biden, who likes "war business," has been planning since he was vice president.
In an interview with FOX News broadcast on the 10th, US President Trump said that Ukraine "may become Russia someday." I think this is the "true feelings" of many American intellectuals.
Trump said, "Ukraine may or may not make a deal. It may or may not become Rus-sia someday." The Maidan Revolution was a revolution started by Biden, so I think it would be "reasonable" to reverse it.
I think President Trump made this statement because he knows Ukraine well. Western Ukraine, where the current administration is based, is poor in resources, but the east is a heavy industrial area with strong pro-Russian sentiment, and the south is a multi-ethnic "commerce and shipping area."
The Crimean Peninsula, an important ice-free port for Russia, has a history of con-stant tug-of-war between the East and the West. I think Trump's remarks included these points.
In 2008, NATO declared that Ukraine and Georgia had agreed to join, raising Rus-sia's alarm.
At the end of 2013, Biden urged the Ukrainian people to overthrow the pro-Russian government, but a recording of his subordinate Nuland plotting a puppet govern-ment was leaked.
When the Maidan Revolution broke out in 2014, Vice President Biden and his subor-dinate Nuland were involved, working hard to overthrow the pro-Russian govern-ment and establish a pro-Western government.
When the pro-Western President Poroshenko took office in the Maidan Revolution of 2014, Russia occupied the Crimean Peninsula and annexed it to Russia. At the time, President Obama rejected Biden's proposal to enter the war.
However, after the Biden administration was launched, the United States regained its "Biden-style authority" through the "Ukraine-Russia War." However, Americans' "values" regarding the Ukraine War are very different.
Without NATO, the value of the United States would decline and it would be unable to export arms, but Republican President Trump has been pushing the idea that "NATO is unnecessary" and that "NATO is unnecessary."
As soon as he took office, Trump put "America First" into practice with "tariffs." This is different from Biden, who uses "war business" as his backbone. The "EU," which was subordinate to Biden, is in chaos.
I am against the "war business." So, although I "have different views" on "immigra-tion issues" and "tariff issues," I support Trump's "America First" approach. Good luck, President Trump!
Part 1 Citations and References
"Ukraine may become Russia someday," Trump blurts out in TV interview
https://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3562400
Biden, who established a puppet US government in Ukraine in 2014, and Nuland, who "hands out cookies"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/087fd5204f4dd44820b6c490ec8ff92c03be266f
What is the US's global strategy behind the Ukraine war?
https://www.tyg.jp/research/detail.html?id=13842
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-25: Weekday edition,
As expected of President Trump! "Ukraine may become Russia someday," Trump blurted out in a TV interview. The Ukraine war is a war that Biden, who likes "war business," has been planning since he was vice president.
In an interview with FOX News broadcast on the 10th, US President Trump said that Ukraine "may become Russia someday." I think this is the "true feelings" of many American intellectuals.
Trump said, "Ukraine may or may not make a deal. It may or may not become Rus-sia someday." The Maidan Revolution was a revolution started by Biden, so I think it would be "reasonable" to reverse it.
I think President Trump made this statement because he knows Ukraine well. Western Ukraine, where the current administration is based, is poor in resources, but the east is a heavy industrial area with strong pro-Russian sentiment, and the south is a multi-ethnic "commerce and shipping area."
The Crimean Peninsula, an important ice-free port for Russia, has a history of con-stant tug-of-war between the East and the West. I think Trump's remarks included these points.
In 2008, NATO declared that Ukraine and Georgia had agreed to join, raising Rus-sia's alarm.
At the end of 2013, Biden urged the Ukrainian people to overthrow the pro-Russian government, but a recording of his subordinate Nuland plotting a puppet govern-ment was leaked.
When the Maidan Revolution broke out in 2014, Vice President Biden and his subor-dinate Nuland were involved, working hard to overthrow the pro-Russian govern-ment and establish a pro-Western government.
When the pro-Western President Poroshenko took office in the Maidan Revolution of 2014, Russia occupied the Crimean Peninsula and annexed it to Russia. At the time, President Obama rejected Biden's proposal to enter the war.
However, after the Biden administration was launched, the United States regained its "Biden-style authority" through the "Ukraine-Russia War." However, Americans' "values" regarding the Ukraine War are very different.
Without NATO, the value of the United States would decline and it would be unable to export arms, but Republican President Trump has been pushing the idea that "NATO is unnecessary" and that "NATO is unnecessary."
As soon as he took office, Trump put "America First" into practice with "tariffs." This is different from Biden, who uses "war business" as his backbone. The "EU," which was subordinate to Biden, is in chaos.
I am against the "war business." So, although I "have different views" on "immigra-tion issues" and "tariff issues," I support Trump's "America First" approach. Good luck, President Trump!
Part 1 Citations and References
"Ukraine may become Russia someday," Trump blurts out in TV interview
https://www.afpbb.com/articles/-/3562400
Biden, who established a puppet US government in Ukraine in 2014, and Nuland, who "hands out cookies"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/expert/articles/087fd5204f4dd44820b6c490ec8ff92c03be266f
What is the US's global strategy behind the Ukraine war?
https://www.tyg.jp/research/detail.html?id=13842
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます