To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-13: Weekday edition,
When the "Philippine Special Zone" is established, Filipinos will be able to work in factories within the "Special Zone".
"Palestinians in Gaza" qualify as "temporary immigrants", but Filipinos can work as residents of the "State of the Philippines".
In the "Special Zone on the Mexican Border", "illegal immigrants" from Central and South America will live and work in the "Special Zone" as "temporary immigrants". The "Special Zone" cannot be run by "temporary immigrants" alone. Many Ameri-cans will work in the "Special Zone".
Even in the "Philippine Special Zone", "Filipinos" will work as "engineers" and "clerks". In particular, "engineers" will work as Palestinian leaders under British en-gineers.
I think the UK will build automobile factories, home appliances, smartphones, ship-building, and other manufacturing plants in the "Philippine Special Zone".
British car manufacturers are good at manufacturing luxury cars and sports cars, and are characterized by a fusion of tradition and innovation. I think many manu-facturers will "manufacture" "hydrogen engine cars" in the future.
"Rolls Royce, Bentley, Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin, Lotus, McLaren, Caterham, MINI" will also "switch" to "hydrogen engine cars".
Car companies will manufacture car parts in the UK and "export" them to the "Phil-ippine Special Zone". They will manufacture finished cars in the "Special Zone" and export them to China and Southeast Asia.
"Hydrogen engine cars" produced in the "Philippine Special Zone" will be "low-priced". I think that low-priced, historic British brand cars will "sell like hotcakes" even if they are manufactured in the Philippines.
If finished cars shipped from the "Philippine Special Zone" sell like hotcakes, the number of "car parts" exported from the UK mainland will also increase. The UK will enjoy a boom.
If the British change their way of thinking and compete with Chinese products, they can return to the UK of the past. The UK lost to Chinese products because they wanted to make cars in the UK from start to finish.
This also applies to France's Algeria special zone. In order to increase employment and earn high incomes for French people, the unemployed should be given jobs, and the French should increase their incomes by doing high-value-added work.
The United States is the one that needs to understand this idea the most. Moreover, low-wage workers are "flooding" the United States. It would be a shame to "send them back."
Yes, the Trump administration should operate a special zone for the Philippines in three countries: the UK, the US, and the Philippines.
If the three countries operate a "special zone for the Philippines," the United States will also understand the benefits of "operating a special zone."
If that happens, I think the United States will create a "special zone on the Mexican border" before "Russia or China" create a "Special Zone of Columbia."
Part 1 Citations and References
Comparison of labor costs in Asia, surprisingly large regional differences in wage levels
https://www.jetro.go.jp/biz/areareports/2020/cbdf0cefc691ae25.html
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-13: Weekday edition,
When the "Philippine Special Zone" is established, Filipinos will be able to work in factories within the "Special Zone".
"Palestinians in Gaza" qualify as "temporary immigrants", but Filipinos can work as residents of the "State of the Philippines".
In the "Special Zone on the Mexican Border", "illegal immigrants" from Central and South America will live and work in the "Special Zone" as "temporary immigrants". The "Special Zone" cannot be run by "temporary immigrants" alone. Many Ameri-cans will work in the "Special Zone".
Even in the "Philippine Special Zone", "Filipinos" will work as "engineers" and "clerks". In particular, "engineers" will work as Palestinian leaders under British en-gineers.
I think the UK will build automobile factories, home appliances, smartphones, ship-building, and other manufacturing plants in the "Philippine Special Zone".
British car manufacturers are good at manufacturing luxury cars and sports cars, and are characterized by a fusion of tradition and innovation. I think many manu-facturers will "manufacture" "hydrogen engine cars" in the future.
"Rolls Royce, Bentley, Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin, Lotus, McLaren, Caterham, MINI" will also "switch" to "hydrogen engine cars".
Car companies will manufacture car parts in the UK and "export" them to the "Phil-ippine Special Zone". They will manufacture finished cars in the "Special Zone" and export them to China and Southeast Asia.
"Hydrogen engine cars" produced in the "Philippine Special Zone" will be "low-priced". I think that low-priced, historic British brand cars will "sell like hotcakes" even if they are manufactured in the Philippines.
If finished cars shipped from the "Philippine Special Zone" sell like hotcakes, the number of "car parts" exported from the UK mainland will also increase. The UK will enjoy a boom.
If the British change their way of thinking and compete with Chinese products, they can return to the UK of the past. The UK lost to Chinese products because they wanted to make cars in the UK from start to finish.
This also applies to France's Algeria special zone. In order to increase employment and earn high incomes for French people, the unemployed should be given jobs, and the French should increase their incomes by doing high-value-added work.
The United States is the one that needs to understand this idea the most. Moreover, low-wage workers are "flooding" the United States. It would be a shame to "send them back."
Yes, the Trump administration should operate a special zone for the Philippines in three countries: the UK, the US, and the Philippines.
If the three countries operate a "special zone for the Philippines," the United States will also understand the benefits of "operating a special zone."
If that happens, I think the United States will create a "special zone on the Mexican border" before "Russia or China" create a "Special Zone of Columbia."
Part 1 Citations and References
Comparison of labor costs in Asia, surprisingly large regional differences in wage levels
https://www.jetro.go.jp/biz/areareports/2020/cbdf0cefc691ae25.html
I will write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます