To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-17: Weekday edition,
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the high tolls of the Panama Canal, saying that "we are being ripped off by unimaginable amounts." Very Trump-like, but is this "MAGA"?!
Instead of "complaining about the high tolls," "I propose" building a "straight canal railway" on the Mexican border that would "cross the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean in two hours." This is MAGA!
Panama already gives priority to US warships. The US and Panama have a treaty that stipulates the permanent neutrality of the canal. If the US military has priority, then that's fine!
Panama expressed the view that regaining control and giving preferential tolls would be a violation of the treaty.
I understand Trump's feelings, but I think it would be more "MAGA" to build a "straight canal railway" across the entire US. The American people should "request" Trump.
Trump also claims that China runs the canal. This is likely a reference to the fact that companies under the Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings operate the ports at both ends of the canal. Why are you saying this now!
The Panama Canal was originally legally built and owned by the United States. In 1977, then Democratic President Jimmy Carter decided to return it to Panama, over the fierce opposition of US conservatives.
Carter, a liberal Democrat who became US president in January 1977, announced his intention to return the Panama Canal to his home country, Panama, immediately after taking office.
The official reason given was "to correct US imperialist policies." A typical US liber-al way of thinking.
In fact, at that time there were large-scale anti-American protests in Panama call-ing for the complete purchase of the canal.
There are now concerns that the canal is controlled by a Chinese company, which the US considers its biggest threat. The "return" to the United States is strongly desired in the United States, where conservative sentiment is on the rise.
I propose the construction of a "linear canal railway" across the United States at the Mexican border to avoid the "Panama Canal problem" and because "climate change is hindering navigation through the Panama Canal."
Above all, why go through the Panama Canal to transport goods from the East Coast of the United States to the West Coast? It is "legitimate" to transport goods within the United States. Americans should develop a "sense of patriotism."
The users of the "linear canal railway" will be the same as those of the Panama Ca-nal, with the United States, China, and Japan being the top three countries. Let's make Chinese President Xi Jinping say, "The 'linear canal railway' is fast, but it's a rip-off."
The "linear canal railway" is a freight railway exclusively for containers, and it crosses the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean in two hours using Japan's 500 km/h "linear Shinkansen" technology.
Republicans and Democrats should establish a bipartisan committee to consider the construction of a linear canal railway. For more information on the linear canal rail-way, please see my previous posts or contact me by email.
Part 1 Citations and References
Former head of the Panama Canal Authority criticizes recapturing the U.S. as "un-dermining neutrality"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/1ac4a894e5365697e482d77894b073d20caeb151
Recapturing the Panama Canal is the long-cherished wish of American conserva-tives: the history of the Carter vs. Reagan battle
https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/seminar/19/00023/013100453/
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-02-17: Weekday edition,
Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the high tolls of the Panama Canal, saying that "we are being ripped off by unimaginable amounts." Very Trump-like, but is this "MAGA"?!
Instead of "complaining about the high tolls," "I propose" building a "straight canal railway" on the Mexican border that would "cross the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean in two hours." This is MAGA!
Panama already gives priority to US warships. The US and Panama have a treaty that stipulates the permanent neutrality of the canal. If the US military has priority, then that's fine!
Panama expressed the view that regaining control and giving preferential tolls would be a violation of the treaty.
I understand Trump's feelings, but I think it would be more "MAGA" to build a "straight canal railway" across the entire US. The American people should "request" Trump.
Trump also claims that China runs the canal. This is likely a reference to the fact that companies under the Hong Kong conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings operate the ports at both ends of the canal. Why are you saying this now!
The Panama Canal was originally legally built and owned by the United States. In 1977, then Democratic President Jimmy Carter decided to return it to Panama, over the fierce opposition of US conservatives.
Carter, a liberal Democrat who became US president in January 1977, announced his intention to return the Panama Canal to his home country, Panama, immediately after taking office.
The official reason given was "to correct US imperialist policies." A typical US liber-al way of thinking.
In fact, at that time there were large-scale anti-American protests in Panama call-ing for the complete purchase of the canal.
There are now concerns that the canal is controlled by a Chinese company, which the US considers its biggest threat. The "return" to the United States is strongly desired in the United States, where conservative sentiment is on the rise.
I propose the construction of a "linear canal railway" across the United States at the Mexican border to avoid the "Panama Canal problem" and because "climate change is hindering navigation through the Panama Canal."
Above all, why go through the Panama Canal to transport goods from the East Coast of the United States to the West Coast? It is "legitimate" to transport goods within the United States. Americans should develop a "sense of patriotism."
The users of the "linear canal railway" will be the same as those of the Panama Ca-nal, with the United States, China, and Japan being the top three countries. Let's make Chinese President Xi Jinping say, "The 'linear canal railway' is fast, but it's a rip-off."
The "linear canal railway" is a freight railway exclusively for containers, and it crosses the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean in two hours using Japan's 500 km/h "linear Shinkansen" technology.
Republicans and Democrats should establish a bipartisan committee to consider the construction of a linear canal railway. For more information on the linear canal rail-way, please see my previous posts or contact me by email.
Part 1 Citations and References
Former head of the Panama Canal Authority criticizes recapturing the U.S. as "un-dermining neutrality"
https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/1ac4a894e5365697e482d77894b073d20caeb151
Recapturing the Panama Canal is the long-cherished wish of American conserva-tives: the history of the Carter vs. Reagan battle
https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/seminar/19/00023/013100453/
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます