「信」とはモラル。
まずモラルがあって、人それぞれの状況判断に応じて、
自分たちの義務と権利が初めて定義でき、
その価値判断基準の下に、何が良いことか悪いことかが判断できると。
したがって、アリストテレスの正議論は、まず何が正しいかに対する
基準が定義されるということで、本末転倒。
But according to Kant, this has things backward.
It is also at odds with freedom.
If we are to think of ourselves as autonomous beings,
we must first will the moral law.
Only then, after we've arrived at the principle that defines our
duties and rights, can we ask what conception of the good
are compatible with it.
.......
.......We can't frame a just constitution until we first figure out
the best way to live. Rawls disagrees:
"The structure of teleological doctrines is radically misconceived:
from the start they relate the right and the good on the wrong way.
........
「Justice」（Michael J. Sandel著）より抜粋
まずモラルがあって、人それぞれの状況判断に応じて、
自分たちの義務と権利が初めて定義でき、
その価値判断基準の下に、何が良いことか悪いことかが判断できると。
したがって、アリストテレスの正議論は、まず何が正しいかに対する
基準が定義されるということで、本末転倒。
But according to Kant, this has things backward.
It is also at odds with freedom.
If we are to think of ourselves as autonomous beings,
we must first will the moral law.
Only then, after we've arrived at the principle that defines our
duties and rights, can we ask what conception of the good
are compatible with it.
.......
.......We can't frame a just constitution until we first figure out
the best way to live. Rawls disagrees:
"The structure of teleological doctrines is radically misconceived:
from the start they relate the right and the good on the wrong way.
........
「Justice」（Michael J. Sandel著）より抜粋
