本篇essay代写-religions and believes讲了在一个充满不同宗教和信仰的世界里,基督教能够也应该与其他宗教建立和平友好的关系。圣经本身的核心价值在于促进爱与和平,不仅是信徒,也是全人类,基督徒自己也应该学会用不同的思想来促进和平。本篇essay代写由51due代写平台整理,供大家参考阅读。
In a world filled with different religions and believes, Christianity can and should make peace and friendly relationships with other religions. The core value of the Bible itself is the promotion of love and peace, not only with the believers, but all the human beings. Christians themselves should also learn to make peace with different ideas. In order to foster such friendly relationships, it is important for people of different beliefs to find common grounds, in spite of their differences.
The idea of making peace with different people, or even enemies, has deep origins in the Bible. Despite some of the depictions of hatred and violence, the Bible always found ways to turn it around and teach people to follow the peaceful path. As the author describes in the book: “The violent image of vipers soon contrasts with a peaceful animal image: The Holy Spirit descending as a dove upon Jesus. The kingdom of God is dovelike and peaceful. Baptismal repentance means defecting from the former and identifying with the latter. (McLaren, 184)” The possibility of a reformulated baptism in the peaceful way would make it much easier for Christianity to make peace with other religions. The interpretation of the bible holds equal importance as the content of it. “Our stories, sermons, prayers, and songs can contribute to liturgies of hostility or liturgies of kindness, forming communities and individuals who translate those liturgies—for better or worse—into their daily lives and into the history of humanity… and inhumanity. (McLaren, 194)”
Some people argue that selective interpretation of the Bible is wrong. They believe that if the part of peace and kindness are important, so are the ones about hell and damnation. There is a difference, however, in believing in everything blindly and being faithful. “So when militant atheists… accuse believers of “picking and choosing,” they are actually accusing them of being responsible believers. (McLaren, 198)” faith is more about making a choice, discriminating between rival interpretations, in order to make the best decision and balance between love and hate, justice and injustice. Therefore, “picking and choosing is deemed destructive by both a fundamentalist Christian and an outspoken atheist, but praised as responsible biblical interpretation by a Catholic philosopher. (McLaren, 198)”
In addition to understanding and interpreting the Bible in a way that promotes love, the perception of individual Christians of both Christianity and other religions also matter for the harmonious coexistence of different religions. The attitude of the Christians towards nonbelievers is somewhat torn. “We may be friendly to individuals of other religions, but our friendship always has a pretext: we want them to switch sides and be won over to our better way (McLaren, 9).” However, the author argues that Christians should be more openminded. “Old-line churches were increasingly ecumenical, respectful of and open to dialogue with other faith communities and the meaning they offered. They were about making friends, not converts. (McLaren, 35)” the idea of making friends with a non-Christian may sound ridiculous to some, but after exploring true identity of a Christian, it is believed that a Christian identity should be both strong and kind. “By strong I mean vigorous, vital, durable, motivating, faithful, attractive, and defining—an authentic Christian identity that matters. By kind I mean something far more robust than mere tolerance, political correctness, or coexistence: benevolent, hospitable, accepting, interested, and loving, so that the stronger our Christian faith, the more goodwill we will feel and show toward those of other faiths, seeking to understand and appreciate their religion from their point of view. (McLaren, 10)”
It can be difficult to generalize all the Christians, since there are different subcultures of the Christian community, some are more open to other ideas, yet others more conservative. it would be inappropriate to label all the expressions of fear, superiority, and hostility with negativity. Instead, the motivations and sources of such negative emotions should be targeted. Christians go to the extreme sides only because they want to stay faithful, or to avoid hostility. Therefore, the idea of choice should be introduced to all Christians: “You are seeking a way of being a Christian that makes you more hospitable, not more hostile… more loving, not more judgmental… more like Christ and less like many churchgoers you have met (McLaren, 27).” In the modern world, no religion should continue to make claims of superiority over others. “The only viable response to religious hostility is love, empathy, compassion, understanding—not more hostility (McLaren, 43).”
The relationship between different is not necessarily incompatible, disharmonious, fractious, and hostile. The most important idea to have in mind is that we are all human beings, no matter what our beliefs are. “We make it matter less that they are Muslim or Hindu by making it matter less that we are Christian. We might even say that we love them in spite of our own religious identity (McLaren, 9).” Sometimes, it is easier to make friends with a person than to accept their beliefs. The reason it that the actions of a person is what we can understand, and the understanding of these behaviors has created a common ground between us. In terms of religions, the author argues that “people should have a strong Christian identity that is strongly benevolent toward people of other faiths, accepting them not in spite of the religion they love, but with the religion they love (McLaren, 31).” Some may feel that the difference between religious beliefs are so big that mutual understanding can never be achieved. However, such failure is only because of the different perspectives of observation. “The stronger our Christian commitment, the more we emphasize our differences with other faiths and the more we frame those differences in terms of good/ evil, right/ wrong, and better/ worse (McLaren, 9).” When we are exposed to beliefs of a different religion, “We never proselytize. We always show respect for other religions and their adherents. We always minimize differences and maximize commonalities. But we typically achieve coexistence by weakening our Christian identity (McLaren, 31).”
In conclusion, the relationship between Christianity and other religions can and should be friendly. Christians must seek inner peace by careful examination of the Bible and being faithful yet not blind. A responsible interpretation of the Bible is required. Finally, the perception of other religions is better understood for Christians, if they can treat non-Christians as human beings seeking the truth of life, just like themselves.
Reference:
McLaren, B. Why Did Jesus, Moses, the Buddha, and Mohammed Cross the Road? Christian Identity in a Multi-Faith World. ISBN: 1455528765. Jericho Books 2012
要想成绩好,英国论文得写好,51due代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯,专业辅导,还为你提供专业英国essay代写,paper代写,report代写,需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due吧。—Ace
In a world filled with different religions and believes, Christianity can and should make peace and friendly relationships with other religions. The core value of the Bible itself is the promotion of love and peace, not only with the believers, but all the human beings. Christians themselves should also learn to make peace with different ideas. In order to foster such friendly relationships, it is important for people of different beliefs to find common grounds, in spite of their differences.
The idea of making peace with different people, or even enemies, has deep origins in the Bible. Despite some of the depictions of hatred and violence, the Bible always found ways to turn it around and teach people to follow the peaceful path. As the author describes in the book: “The violent image of vipers soon contrasts with a peaceful animal image: The Holy Spirit descending as a dove upon Jesus. The kingdom of God is dovelike and peaceful. Baptismal repentance means defecting from the former and identifying with the latter. (McLaren, 184)” The possibility of a reformulated baptism in the peaceful way would make it much easier for Christianity to make peace with other religions. The interpretation of the bible holds equal importance as the content of it. “Our stories, sermons, prayers, and songs can contribute to liturgies of hostility or liturgies of kindness, forming communities and individuals who translate those liturgies—for better or worse—into their daily lives and into the history of humanity… and inhumanity. (McLaren, 194)”
Some people argue that selective interpretation of the Bible is wrong. They believe that if the part of peace and kindness are important, so are the ones about hell and damnation. There is a difference, however, in believing in everything blindly and being faithful. “So when militant atheists… accuse believers of “picking and choosing,” they are actually accusing them of being responsible believers. (McLaren, 198)” faith is more about making a choice, discriminating between rival interpretations, in order to make the best decision and balance between love and hate, justice and injustice. Therefore, “picking and choosing is deemed destructive by both a fundamentalist Christian and an outspoken atheist, but praised as responsible biblical interpretation by a Catholic philosopher. (McLaren, 198)”
In addition to understanding and interpreting the Bible in a way that promotes love, the perception of individual Christians of both Christianity and other religions also matter for the harmonious coexistence of different religions. The attitude of the Christians towards nonbelievers is somewhat torn. “We may be friendly to individuals of other religions, but our friendship always has a pretext: we want them to switch sides and be won over to our better way (McLaren, 9).” However, the author argues that Christians should be more openminded. “Old-line churches were increasingly ecumenical, respectful of and open to dialogue with other faith communities and the meaning they offered. They were about making friends, not converts. (McLaren, 35)” the idea of making friends with a non-Christian may sound ridiculous to some, but after exploring true identity of a Christian, it is believed that a Christian identity should be both strong and kind. “By strong I mean vigorous, vital, durable, motivating, faithful, attractive, and defining—an authentic Christian identity that matters. By kind I mean something far more robust than mere tolerance, political correctness, or coexistence: benevolent, hospitable, accepting, interested, and loving, so that the stronger our Christian faith, the more goodwill we will feel and show toward those of other faiths, seeking to understand and appreciate their religion from their point of view. (McLaren, 10)”
It can be difficult to generalize all the Christians, since there are different subcultures of the Christian community, some are more open to other ideas, yet others more conservative. it would be inappropriate to label all the expressions of fear, superiority, and hostility with negativity. Instead, the motivations and sources of such negative emotions should be targeted. Christians go to the extreme sides only because they want to stay faithful, or to avoid hostility. Therefore, the idea of choice should be introduced to all Christians: “You are seeking a way of being a Christian that makes you more hospitable, not more hostile… more loving, not more judgmental… more like Christ and less like many churchgoers you have met (McLaren, 27).” In the modern world, no religion should continue to make claims of superiority over others. “The only viable response to religious hostility is love, empathy, compassion, understanding—not more hostility (McLaren, 43).”
The relationship between different is not necessarily incompatible, disharmonious, fractious, and hostile. The most important idea to have in mind is that we are all human beings, no matter what our beliefs are. “We make it matter less that they are Muslim or Hindu by making it matter less that we are Christian. We might even say that we love them in spite of our own religious identity (McLaren, 9).” Sometimes, it is easier to make friends with a person than to accept their beliefs. The reason it that the actions of a person is what we can understand, and the understanding of these behaviors has created a common ground between us. In terms of religions, the author argues that “people should have a strong Christian identity that is strongly benevolent toward people of other faiths, accepting them not in spite of the religion they love, but with the religion they love (McLaren, 31).” Some may feel that the difference between religious beliefs are so big that mutual understanding can never be achieved. However, such failure is only because of the different perspectives of observation. “The stronger our Christian commitment, the more we emphasize our differences with other faiths and the more we frame those differences in terms of good/ evil, right/ wrong, and better/ worse (McLaren, 9).” When we are exposed to beliefs of a different religion, “We never proselytize. We always show respect for other religions and their adherents. We always minimize differences and maximize commonalities. But we typically achieve coexistence by weakening our Christian identity (McLaren, 31).”
In conclusion, the relationship between Christianity and other religions can and should be friendly. Christians must seek inner peace by careful examination of the Bible and being faithful yet not blind. A responsible interpretation of the Bible is required. Finally, the perception of other religions is better understood for Christians, if they can treat non-Christians as human beings seeking the truth of life, just like themselves.
Reference:
McLaren, B. Why Did Jesus, Moses, the Buddha, and Mohammed Cross the Road? Christian Identity in a Multi-Faith World. ISBN: 1455528765. Jericho Books 2012
要想成绩好,英国论文得写好,51due代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯,专业辅导,还为你提供专业英国essay代写,paper代写,report代写,需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due吧。—Ace