大学二年のときにやった英語のプレゼンの原稿がいくつかでてきたー！
原稿っていってもかなり短いんだけどね。
捨てようかと思ったんだけど、もったいないから日記に書きとめてから捨てることにした（＾ω＾ ）笑
完全自己満です、すいません。
まず"Surrogacy(代理出産)"について（・ω・）/
It is extremely natural that people who have married are blessed wit a child, and many people take it for granted that women have babies.But there are also some kinds of people, who can't have a baby because of their physical defect. Those people sometimes may rely on the method called "surrogacy". Surrogacy is the practice of giving birth to a baby for another woman who ist unable to have babies herself. Now, there are 200,000 people who can't have a baby because of their physical defect. Surrogate is the only method for them to have their own babies.
Some countries forbid surrogacy, but at present Japan doesn't forbid it legally. There are various opinions on this matter, and it is a very difficult problem. What do you think about this matter? If you can't have a baby, do you want to use this method? And do you think surrogacy schould be admitted in every country?
I don't think so. I consider that surrogacy schould not be legalized. Today I want to tell you why I think so and explain the danger of surrogancy.
First of all, I think surrogacy may cause discrimination, because of the surrogate mather's attribute. As long al clients pay rewards to the surrogate mother for giving birth to child, we can't ignore this danger. The reward may depend on her academic background, race ( white or black) and so on.
Second, there ist one possilbility that if a woman who can't have a baby because of her inherent abnormality of sexual organs uses this method, babies habe a possibility that they inherit same abnormality and that they als suffer from it. So I think the people who can't have a baby, but want ist, is selfish and this ist ignoring their baby's physical problem.
And even if clients pay a reward to surrogate mother, birth ist an act with profound danger. Even thoughin today's technology is advanced, there are some cases that a pregnant woman dies in childbirth. If the surrogate mother dies in childbirth, who should take the responsibility of the problem? I think surrogacy ignores the risk of mother's childbirth.
Finally, there are also dangers that after childbirth, surrogate mother may refuse to hand her child over to the client. I think a woman comes to feel a strong attachment to her child once she brings a baby up in her stomach, even though the baby is not hers.
For these reasons, I don't agree to surrogacy. But in fact, there are great demands for surrogacy in many countries and I can sympathize with the supporter's opinion to some extent. It's a quite difficult issue, and I think we should think about this problem now. Thank you.
うーむ…
今読み返してみると、何で自分が代理出産反対派なのかいまいちわからんな笑
反論のほうが書きやすいって思ってこう書いてただけなのかな。。。
偉そうに徒然と、selfishだのthey ignore the risk of なんちゃらだの書いてるけど…
不妊症だからって、じゃあ子供もつのは諦めろっていうのも酷な話だよなー、、
血のつながりなんて関係ない！なんて口では言っても
やっぱり単に養子をもらうのと自分の子供を授かるのって違うんだろうなって思うし。
二年前は今よりも更に考えが子供だったから
目先のリスクとかにばっかり目がいってたのかなー…
久々にネットで代理出産について調べてみたけど、
「2008年4月、日本学術会議は、代理懐胎の法規制と原則禁止などを内容とする提言を行った」てあるだけで
提言とはあってもやっぱり正式に法で禁じられてはいないんだね。
売春みたいに、「性を切り売りする」ようなもんなのかなー、代理出産って。
でも買春と違って、代理出産なんてふらっと軽いノリでするものじゃなく
色々考えたうえでの決断で頼む人は頼むわけじゃんきっと。
簡単に禁止なんて言われても、子供産みたい人は産みたいだろうしさ( ´・ω・｀)
自分でも原稿のなかに
「そもそも子供を授かれないっていうのは遺伝子学的に問題があるという可能性があるわけで、それなのに無理やり代理出産にのって自分の遺伝子をもった子を作ると、その子も同じ欠陥のある遺伝子を受け取り苦しむことになる」みたいなことが書いてあったから
そのリスクを顧みずに産むのはエゴなのかもしれないけど
でも自分だったら、何としてでも自分の子供がほしいって思っちゃうんだろうな、やっぱり。
あー何が言いたいのかわからなくなってきた笑
英語でも日本語でもドイツ語でも、相変わらずアカデミックな話題は苦手です笑
てか自分の英語、やっぱりひどいなｗｗ
高校一年くらいの子が書いた文章のようだ。
仮にも大学生だというのにね（；ω；）
でもいまは更に英語の語学力劣化してるから
まじがんばらなきゃ（；ω；）
あー。
ひびこれしょうじん。。
てかこの日記全部読んだ人なんて絶対いないよね、うん。笑
原稿っていってもかなり短いんだけどね。
捨てようかと思ったんだけど、もったいないから日記に書きとめてから捨てることにした（＾ω＾ ）笑
完全自己満です、すいません。
まず"Surrogacy(代理出産)"について（・ω・）/
It is extremely natural that people who have married are blessed wit a child, and many people take it for granted that women have babies.But there are also some kinds of people, who can't have a baby because of their physical defect. Those people sometimes may rely on the method called "surrogacy". Surrogacy is the practice of giving birth to a baby for another woman who ist unable to have babies herself. Now, there are 200,000 people who can't have a baby because of their physical defect. Surrogate is the only method for them to have their own babies.
Some countries forbid surrogacy, but at present Japan doesn't forbid it legally. There are various opinions on this matter, and it is a very difficult problem. What do you think about this matter? If you can't have a baby, do you want to use this method? And do you think surrogacy schould be admitted in every country?
I don't think so. I consider that surrogacy schould not be legalized. Today I want to tell you why I think so and explain the danger of surrogancy.
First of all, I think surrogacy may cause discrimination, because of the surrogate mather's attribute. As long al clients pay rewards to the surrogate mother for giving birth to child, we can't ignore this danger. The reward may depend on her academic background, race ( white or black) and so on.
Second, there ist one possilbility that if a woman who can't have a baby because of her inherent abnormality of sexual organs uses this method, babies habe a possibility that they inherit same abnormality and that they als suffer from it. So I think the people who can't have a baby, but want ist, is selfish and this ist ignoring their baby's physical problem.
And even if clients pay a reward to surrogate mother, birth ist an act with profound danger. Even thoughin today's technology is advanced, there are some cases that a pregnant woman dies in childbirth. If the surrogate mother dies in childbirth, who should take the responsibility of the problem? I think surrogacy ignores the risk of mother's childbirth.
Finally, there are also dangers that after childbirth, surrogate mother may refuse to hand her child over to the client. I think a woman comes to feel a strong attachment to her child once she brings a baby up in her stomach, even though the baby is not hers.
For these reasons, I don't agree to surrogacy. But in fact, there are great demands for surrogacy in many countries and I can sympathize with the supporter's opinion to some extent. It's a quite difficult issue, and I think we should think about this problem now. Thank you.
うーむ…
今読み返してみると、何で自分が代理出産反対派なのかいまいちわからんな笑
反論のほうが書きやすいって思ってこう書いてただけなのかな。。。
偉そうに徒然と、selfishだのthey ignore the risk of なんちゃらだの書いてるけど…
不妊症だからって、じゃあ子供もつのは諦めろっていうのも酷な話だよなー、、
血のつながりなんて関係ない！なんて口では言っても
やっぱり単に養子をもらうのと自分の子供を授かるのって違うんだろうなって思うし。
二年前は今よりも更に考えが子供だったから
目先のリスクとかにばっかり目がいってたのかなー…
久々にネットで代理出産について調べてみたけど、
「2008年4月、日本学術会議は、代理懐胎の法規制と原則禁止などを内容とする提言を行った」てあるだけで
提言とはあってもやっぱり正式に法で禁じられてはいないんだね。
売春みたいに、「性を切り売りする」ようなもんなのかなー、代理出産って。
でも買春と違って、代理出産なんてふらっと軽いノリでするものじゃなく
色々考えたうえでの決断で頼む人は頼むわけじゃんきっと。
簡単に禁止なんて言われても、子供産みたい人は産みたいだろうしさ( ´・ω・｀)
自分でも原稿のなかに
「そもそも子供を授かれないっていうのは遺伝子学的に問題があるという可能性があるわけで、それなのに無理やり代理出産にのって自分の遺伝子をもった子を作ると、その子も同じ欠陥のある遺伝子を受け取り苦しむことになる」みたいなことが書いてあったから
そのリスクを顧みずに産むのはエゴなのかもしれないけど
でも自分だったら、何としてでも自分の子供がほしいって思っちゃうんだろうな、やっぱり。
あー何が言いたいのかわからなくなってきた笑
英語でも日本語でもドイツ語でも、相変わらずアカデミックな話題は苦手です笑
てか自分の英語、やっぱりひどいなｗｗ
高校一年くらいの子が書いた文章のようだ。
仮にも大学生だというのにね（；ω；）
でもいまは更に英語の語学力劣化してるから
まじがんばらなきゃ（；ω；）
あー。
ひびこれしょうじん。。
てかこの日記全部読んだ人なんて絶対いないよね、うん。笑
」