本篇paper代写- Criticism of western marxism讨论了西方马克思主义的批判性。西方马克思主义的发展的历程就是批判的历程,批判性是西方马克思主义哲学的根本属性。西方马克思主义在不断地批判与自我批判中发展和完善马克思主义。对第二国际的批判,捍卫了马克思主义的哲学本质;对第三国际的批判,使得马克思主义哲学真正全面地超越了近代西方哲学,成为实践的哲学;对现代西方哲学的批判,一方面肯定了哲学的世界观意义与本体论的存在意义,防止哲学陷入主观主义。本篇论文代写范文由51due代写平台整理,供大家参考阅读。
At first, western marxism was regarded as the "heresy" of marxism. However, after decades of history, especially after the international socialist movement suffered serious setbacks today, western marxism still maintains vigorous vitality by virtue of its distinctive criticism.
In the 1920s, the victory of the Russian October revolution inspired a series of proletarian revolutions in central and eastern Europe. However, in sharp contrast to the success of the October revolution, the proletarian revolution in these countries started and ended without a final victory. Why can't the proletarian revolution become a global phenomenon? Why does capitalist society remain stable in the face of such powerful revolutionary forces? In view of these problems, some people think that Engels' distortion of marxist philosophy is the main reason, so they focus on criticizing the old interpretation path, and try to re-explain marxism. Merle ponty called this "left-leaning" trend western marxism in his 1955 book "the adventures of dialectics." Must note that the western marxist criticism of marxism, and is not a critique of Marx's thought, but a criticism of the traditional "marxism", known as the dialectical materialism and historical materialism, the textbook system, it mainly includes the second international marxism and third international marxism.
The core contradiction between the two sides is: is marxism philosophy or not? The second international theorists believe that marxism is not philosophy, and the main basis is the "annihilation philosophy" and "termination philosophy" put forward by Marx in his critique of Hegel's philosophy of law, which is obviously one-sided. First, Marx himself was unsparing in his praise of philosophy and was happy to pretend to be a philosopher. He commented that "any real philosophy is the spiritual essence of one's own time". The extermination and termination of philosophy mentioned by Marx is only his attitude towards philosophy, not enough to show that marxism is not philosophy. Secondly, Marx emphasized the importance of philosophy. He proposed that the proletariat is the material weapon of philosophy, while philosophy is the spiritual weapon of the proletariat. Obviously, Marx attached great importance to the important role of philosophy, so it is more difficult to deny the existence of marxist philosophy.
This simple and arbitrary view of the second international theorists deprived marxism of its guiding power in philosophy. They regard marxism as an objective law that must be followed in order to realize socialism and communism, and attempt to make it scientific and empirical, which ignores the subjective initiative of people, making marxism become rigid dogma, directly leading to the failure of proletarian revolution in many European countries. In the view of western marxism, philosophy is exactly where the vitality of marxism lies. To deny the philosophic nature, to regard marxist philosophy only as a social theory, will make marxism into an air house without foundation. Just as koersch said, "the dialectical materialism of Marx and Engels is, by its basic nature, an out-and-out philosophy and a revolutionary philosophy".
From today's point of view, western marxism's criticism of the second international marxism is of great significance. It opposes the wrong tendency of the second international to de-philosophize marxism, clarifies the philosophical identity of marxism, and keeps the foundation and lifeblood of marxism.
The third international marxism, or Leninism as we often call it, is one of the most influential marxist explanations in history. In China, this interpretation is still the most universal understanding of marxism.
One of the differences between the two sides is that third international marxism holds that marxism consists of marxist philosophy, marxist political economy and scientific socialism. Lenin once clearly pointed out that "marxism is the world view of the proletariat, a complete and rigorous scientific world view, and the theoretical weapon for the proletariat to understand and transform the world." He believed that marxism was the world outlook and guiding method of the proletariat's materialism, which emphasized the decisive position of matter in the relationship between matter and consciousness, and actively promoted the role of marxism as a revolutionary theory, instead of treating marxism only as philosophy. Western marxism, on the other hand, thinks that marxism is mainly philosophy. They oppose to equate marxist philosophy with Marx's economic theory, political theory and revolutionary theory. However, considering the historical background at that time, the third international marxist theorists' understanding of marxist content is based on the need to guide the construction and development of the socialist regime in the former Soviet union. Moreover, compared with the second international in terms of marxism, the third international admitted that the position of marxist philosophy, marxist philosophy of marxism does not deny that, as a way of being, only on the basis of the expansion of the content, so that is not enough to view with the theory of western marxism form the fundamental contradiction.
Western marxism's criticism of the third international marxism focuses on another difference between the two sides, that is, the relationship between thinking and existence. The third international marxism regards the relationship between thought and existence as the basic problem of marxist philosophy. We insist on the second principle of the primary consciousness of matter and think that human cognition is the reflection of objective reality. In the study of the development of human society, it is believed that the development of human society, like the development of nature, has its own objective laws, and the development of human society is the inevitability of objective laws. At the same time, they denied the existence of modern western philosophy. They believed that philosophy reached its peak with Hegel, and that philosophy after Hegel was meaningless and decadent capitalist philosophy. However, western marxist theorists point out that such an explanation obviously ignores Marx's series of discourses on "ending philosophy" and "eliminating philosophy", and the third international marxist philosophy is still not out of the scope of modern western philosophy. In fact, marxist philosophy is firmly opposed to the mechanical method of subject-object dichotomy. It emphasizes the dialectical unity between the subject-object and the subject-object, thus transcending the epistemology of modern western metaphysics. The third international marxist theorists' explanations obviously ignore the fundamental difference between marxism and modern western philosophy, and they still use the same set of methods of modern western philosophy to explain marxism. In his opinion, Lenin's thought was nothing more than a continuation of Hegel's, merely replacing the absolute existence of spirit with the absolute existence of matter. In western marxist view, marxism has been beyond the opposition between subject and object, and unifying thinking and exist in the practical activities of human society, as YuWu gold points out, "the relationship between thinking and existence problem is only a matter of knowledge of the basic theory of philosophy, but not all the basic philosophical problems, thus not marxist basic problems; As a philosophy of existentialism, the basic problem of marxism is practice. To sum up, western marxism's criticism of the third international marxism is of great significance. It makes marxist philosophy truly and comprehensively surpass modern western philosophy. This for our country great enlightenment to the study of marxist philosophy theory, especially in eastern Europe upheaval, the international socialist movement after the collapse of the Soviet union suffered a big blow to the background, a critical for us to realize marxism, master the real essence of Marx to guide the construction of socialism with Chinese characteristics and promote the sinicization of marxism is a nice surprise. It is under the inspiration of western marxists that more and more Chinese marxists join the ranks of "back to Marx".
Western marxism's criticism of the third international is actually a miniature of its criticism of modern western philosophy. In the view of western marxist theorists, marxist philosophy is a philosophy that comprehensively surpasses modern western philosophy, and marxism should at least be contemporary with modern western philosophy. Western marxist philosophy both recognizes and criticizes modern western philosophy.
First, they all oppose the metaphysical philosophy in modern western philosophy. On the one hand, "rejecting metaphysics" is a prominent feature of modern western philosophy. Positivism holds that the sphere of philosophy should be limited to the empirical world, and should not be concerned with areas that are beyond the observation of man. Voluntarianism opposes and criticizes abstract material or spiritual entities in metaphysics by emphasizing the function of human emotion and will. On the other hand, western marxism holds that Marx's transcendence of modern western philosophy is an absolute and comprehensive transcendence. It does not mean that Marx moves from one kind of absolute to another kind of absolute. It is not the so-called material absolute replacing the spiritual absolute, but the total transcendence of the thinking mode of the whole metaphysical absolutism. Second, they both oppose system philosophy. In modern western philosophy, the opposition to systematic philosophy is in line with its opposition to metaphysics. In the western marxist philosophy, there are also many theorists of anti-system philosophy, among which the most prominent is adorno, who elaborated on the attitude towards system in his negative dialectics. "The system is a negative objective, not a positive subject," he says. At one stage in history, in terms of the system's suitability for serious content, the system has been banished into the disreputable realm of poetic thought, leaving only the pale outline of an order schema. It is hard to imagine vividly what once drove the philosophical spirit to become a system." Finally, marxist philosophy, like modern western philosophy, tries to turn philosophy into the real life world and emphasizes the subjective initiative of people in real life.
Although there are so many similarities between western marxist philosophy and modern western philosophy, we must realize that there are essential differences between them. Western marxist philosophy still holds a critical attitude towards some parts of modern western philosophy. Otherwise, western marxism is not enough to be a philosophical thought independent of modern western philosophy.
Although they all oppose the metaphysical opposition of subject and object, they emphasize the unity of subject and object. However, the modern western philosophy, especially the existentialist philosophy, ignores the role of human practice while emphasizing the unity of subject and object. Western marxism believes that the unity of subject and object in modern western philosophy is only the unity of subject and object in form, which will inevitably fall into the mire of subjectivism. Western marxism believes that in the process of opposing systematic philosophy, western modern philosophy is so radical and one-sided that it negates philosophy as both world outlook and ontology. From the perspective of western marxist philosophy, philosophy as a world view is the most important meaning of philosophy, which cannot be cancelled; On the basis of both insisting that philosophy face the real life, western marxism criticizes the malpractice of modern western philosophy on people's life. According to the marxist point of view, the social practice of productive labor constitutes the basis of human life. However, modern western philosophy puts aside productive labor and talks about the whole of human life with empty "existence". Western marxism believes that the interpretation of modern western philosophy can not really grasp the existence of man, will inevitably fall back into idealism.
To sum up, the development process of western marxism is the process of criticism, which is the fundamental attribute of western marxist philosophy. Western marxism develops and improves marxism through continuous criticism and self-criticism. The criticism of the second international defends the philosophical essence of marxism; The criticism of the third international makes marxist philosophy truly and comprehensively surpass modern western philosophy and become practical philosophy. The criticism of modern western philosophy, on the one hand, affirms the world outlook meaning of philosophy and the existence meaning of ontology, and prevents philosophy from falling into subjectivism; On the other hand, to explain the life and existence of human beings by means of productive labor, marxism is regarded as a practical ontology and criticized existentialism for its empty talk of "existence" in disregard of social practice.
要想成绩好,英国论文得写好,51due论文代写平台为你提供英国留学资讯,专业辅导,还为你提供专业英国essay代写,paper代写,report代写,需要找论文代写的话快来联系我们51due工作客服QQ:800020041或者Wechat:Abby0900吧。