下面为大家整理一篇优秀的paper代写范文- Broken Machines and Tainted Minds: Mental health and Hamlet，供大家参考学习，这篇论文讨论了《破碎的机器和污染的心灵:心理健康和哈姆雷特》的资源评估。虽然没有具体描述这是否是一个学术来源，但仍然可以通过网上提供的一些方法来评估它。开始阅读这篇文章的内容时，注意到作者的写作结构非常清晰，语言也很适合那些具有特定学科知识的人。根据标准，《破碎的机器和污染的心灵:心理健康和哈姆雷特》是一篇学术和可靠的文章，可以用在学术论文中，它有资格激励观众和任何想用它作为资源的人。
The source that I will be evaluating is, ”Broken Machines and Tainted Minds: Mental health and Hamlet”, by the author Andrew J. Power. It was posted online by the author himself on the website of Academia.edu. I found this article by searching on the Academia.edu via the key word of “Hamlet”. The author tries to analyze the mental problems in Hamlet through some scenes of the play Hamlet.
Although there is no specific description about whether this is a scholarly source, I can still evaluate it through some methodology provided online, and here I am going to compare this article with the tutorial provided by “Know if an article is scholarly”. In order to evaluate this source, I searched the book that published this article, and the editor of the book. I found out that this article is actually published in a book named “On Literature and Science: Essays, Reflections, Provocations. ”, but there is not so much information about this book. Which fits the first characteristic of scholarly articles about advertisement: “few, usually for publications. ”, this evidence is not strong so I looked up the group that published the book, I found out that the publisher Four Courts Press is an Irish academic publishing house, that meets the characteristic “Know if an article is scholarly”, meaning that It was published as an academic article. When I dig deeper, I find out that this is a book that assembled the studies of doctors from the Trinity Collegue of Dublin about literature and science, not only the author himself is a PHD from TCD, which fits the description of authors by “Know if an article is scholarly”, but also, the editor is one of the Doctors from TCD. So in a matter of fact, this article has been peer-reviewed. According to identifying guides, Sources”, ”When a source has been peer-reviewed it has undergone the review and scrutiny of a review board of colleagues in the author's field” (“Researching & Writing Literature Reviews in Religious Studies: Identifying Scholarly Sources”), Which confirms the reliability of the resource.
As I move to the content of this article, it can easily be noticed that the writing structure of the author is very clear with the language geared toward in those with knowledge of a specific discipline. It is mentioned in both “Researching & Writing Literature Reviews in Religious Studies: Identifying Scholarly Sources” and “Know if an article is scholarly”, showing that a scholarly article should have the certain characteristic for the audience to use in the future. There are many verified and cited information in order to prove author's idea, which makes this article more reliable because according to “Researching & Writing Literature Reviews in Religious Studies: Identifying Scholarly Sources”, a scholarly source should not be just a bias of author’s own, it should have some supportive evidence to prove his idea.
Through the evidence, we can see from here that this article is consistent with the characteristics of academic resources, as for the current, regardless of the fact that this article was published in 2007, it won’t affect the idea within. It provides a very interesting perspective for us to have a better understanding of the literature study, so it will be useful if we choose the right information.
In a word, according to tutorial, ”Broken Machines and Tainted Minds : Mental health and Hamlet” is a scholarly and reliable article that can be used in academic essays, and it is qualified on inspiring the audience and whoever going to use it as a resource.
51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创paper代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、美国作业代写服务。
51due为留学生提供最好的美国作业代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多代写范文 提供美国作业代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。
The source that I will be evaluating is, ”Broken Machines and Tainted Minds: Mental health and Hamlet”, by the author Andrew J. Power. It was posted online by the author himself on the website of Academia.edu. I found this article by searching on the Academia.edu via the key word of “Hamlet”. The author tries to analyze the mental problems in Hamlet through some scenes of the play Hamlet.
Although there is no specific description about whether this is a scholarly source, I can still evaluate it through some methodology provided online, and here I am going to compare this article with the tutorial provided by “Know if an article is scholarly”. In order to evaluate this source, I searched the book that published this article, and the editor of the book. I found out that this article is actually published in a book named “On Literature and Science: Essays, Reflections, Provocations. ”, but there is not so much information about this book. Which fits the first characteristic of scholarly articles about advertisement: “few, usually for publications. ”, this evidence is not strong so I looked up the group that published the book, I found out that the publisher Four Courts Press is an Irish academic publishing house, that meets the characteristic “Know if an article is scholarly”, meaning that It was published as an academic article. When I dig deeper, I find out that this is a book that assembled the studies of doctors from the Trinity Collegue of Dublin about literature and science, not only the author himself is a PHD from TCD, which fits the description of authors by “Know if an article is scholarly”, but also, the editor is one of the Doctors from TCD. So in a matter of fact, this article has been peer-reviewed. According to identifying guides, Sources”, ”When a source has been peer-reviewed it has undergone the review and scrutiny of a review board of colleagues in the author's field” (“Researching & Writing Literature Reviews in Religious Studies: Identifying Scholarly Sources”), Which confirms the reliability of the resource.
As I move to the content of this article, it can easily be noticed that the writing structure of the author is very clear with the language geared toward in those with knowledge of a specific discipline. It is mentioned in both “Researching & Writing Literature Reviews in Religious Studies: Identifying Scholarly Sources” and “Know if an article is scholarly”, showing that a scholarly article should have the certain characteristic for the audience to use in the future. There are many verified and cited information in order to prove author's idea, which makes this article more reliable because according to “Researching & Writing Literature Reviews in Religious Studies: Identifying Scholarly Sources”, a scholarly source should not be just a bias of author’s own, it should have some supportive evidence to prove his idea.
Through the evidence, we can see from here that this article is consistent with the characteristics of academic resources, as for the current, regardless of the fact that this article was published in 2007, it won’t affect the idea within. It provides a very interesting perspective for us to have a better understanding of the literature study, so it will be useful if we choose the right information.
In a word, according to tutorial, ”Broken Machines and Tainted Minds : Mental health and Hamlet” is a scholarly and reliable article that can be used in academic essays, and it is qualified on inspiring the audience and whoever going to use it as a resource.
51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创paper代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。主要业务有essay代写、assignment代写、paper代写、美国作业代写服务。
51due为留学生提供最好的美国作业代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多代写范文 提供美国作业代写服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ：800020041。