Without torturing a Chinese citizen, let's admit the liberty of the political remark!
It is reported by all over the world when being a writer in China and 余傑 which is an activist of the human rights applies for the asylum to the U.S..
The person all over the world knew the mean torture for which it is difficult to render service to what explanation during the period when 余傑 was restricted by the Chinese public safety authorities it received.
余傑 was taken to the secret facilities by the Chinese public safety authorities and could add the の ravishment to kick to hit circle naked in the condition.
It is threatened when " buried alive within 30 minutes made " then " if there is a direction of one breaks a finger. if writing the sentences to criticize the Communist Party of China ".
It is the thing that a written oath was demanded not to criticize nine of the ② Communist Party of China government politburo managing director member of the committee who don't contact a ① foreigner reporter in the place.
Why does the Communist Party of China government which is a permanent member of the Security Council in the Security Council in the United Nations have the right which it requests to avoid contact with the foreigner reporter to the internationally playing an active part Chinese citizen?
Does one Chinese citizen contact a foreigner reporter only and is the justice of the Communist Party of China government as fragile as that it has collapsed?
Moreover, the political remark of the one's own citizen to the Chinese executives which are a permanent member of the Security Council in the Security Council in the United Nations why does it put on by the force-out?
A charter which becomes the basis that the faith with these items can be concluded Charter of United Nations where is there?
Wanting to have the Communist Party of China government clarify the reason that the community can do consent
The Communist Party of China government is to release the 劉暁波氏 of the Nobel peace prize winner according to in 2010 from the community at once in the justice to insist on if wanting to be recognized.
There is not a meaning that it isn't possible to make the release of the political offense who could be clear in Myanmar which is closest allies to be the Communist Party of China government.
Early on the 1st, in the Communist Party of China government, it wants to want to release a political offense in the own country.
It is reported by all over the world when being a writer in China and 余傑 which is an activist of the human rights applies for the asylum to the U.S..
The person all over the world knew the mean torture for which it is difficult to render service to what explanation during the period when 余傑 was restricted by the Chinese public safety authorities it received.
余傑 was taken to the secret facilities by the Chinese public safety authorities and could add the の ravishment to kick to hit circle naked in the condition.
It is threatened when " buried alive within 30 minutes made " then " if there is a direction of one breaks a finger. if writing the sentences to criticize the Communist Party of China ".
It is the thing that a written oath was demanded not to criticize nine of the ② Communist Party of China government politburo managing director member of the committee who don't contact a ① foreigner reporter in the place.
Why does the Communist Party of China government which is a permanent member of the Security Council in the Security Council in the United Nations have the right which it requests to avoid contact with the foreigner reporter to the internationally playing an active part Chinese citizen?
Does one Chinese citizen contact a foreigner reporter only and is the justice of the Communist Party of China government as fragile as that it has collapsed?
Moreover, the political remark of the one's own citizen to the Chinese executives which are a permanent member of the Security Council in the Security Council in the United Nations why does it put on by the force-out?
A charter which becomes the basis that the faith with these items can be concluded Charter of United Nations where is there?
Wanting to have the Communist Party of China government clarify the reason that the community can do consent
The Communist Party of China government is to release the 劉暁波氏 of the Nobel peace prize winner according to in 2010 from the community at once in the justice to insist on if wanting to be recognized.
There is not a meaning that it isn't possible to make the release of the political offense who could be clear in Myanmar which is closest allies to be the Communist Party of China government.
Early on the 1st, in the Communist Party of China government, it wants to want to release a political offense in the own country.
