Is China a country ruled by law of mob-ized regulation, and a mob-ized neglect state?
Is the inside of China presenting the aspect before a modern state without "rule of law" after all?
Is it the riot which borrowed the name from the demonstration rather than calling it the anti-Japan demonstration which aimed at Japanese companies?
Although a country ruled by law can prevent mob-ization firmly, the Communist Party of China government's having tolerated substantially are "patriotism no crime" and "bad one's being always Japan", and it cannot but call it the mob-ized neglect state which can carry out [ mob ]-izing without limit.
Why doesn't it take out a tank like the time of a 64 Tiananmen massacre case?
I also regard the choice of not associating with this country for a while as required.
If the China risk whose control is not effective is discovered at all, let's correspond supposing the worst situation.
Is the inside of China presenting the aspect before a modern state without "rule of law" after all?
Is it the riot which borrowed the name from the demonstration rather than calling it the anti-Japan demonstration which aimed at Japanese companies?
Although a country ruled by law can prevent mob-ization firmly, the Communist Party of China government's having tolerated substantially are "patriotism no crime" and "bad one's being always Japan", and it cannot but call it the mob-ized neglect state which can carry out [ mob ]-izing without limit.
Why doesn't it take out a tank like the time of a 64 Tiananmen massacre case?
I also regard the choice of not associating with this country for a while as required.
If the China risk whose control is not effective is discovered at all, let's correspond supposing the worst situation.
