この東旭川の養蚕民家は、福島県伊達市近郊からの1905年の移住者の建築。
この北海道旭川で故郷での養蚕民家建築を移植したもの。
当然、故郷での同様建築への興味が湧くところですが、
これも匿名氏からの情報を頂きました。福島県に民家園があって、
そこにほぼ同様の建築機能をもった養蚕民家があるのだというのです。
インターネットで調べたところ画像があり、見やすく修正を試みた写真です。
正面側と切妻側の様子を比較対照した画像対比。
1-2番目が福島でそれ以外が旭川です。
福島県では正面側では手前南面側に外部縁側が１−２階とも確認されますが、
旭川ではこれがガラス入りの外部建具で仕切られている。
福島県の方でも写真に雪がちょっと写ったりしているけれど、
もちろん北海道北部の旭川盆地ではハンパない寒冷と積雪条件。
地域に似合うようにスタイルが進化していっていると受け止められる。
一方、切妻側では上の写真の福島では下屋が付設されていますが、
下の旭川では構造が積雪に耐えられずに破却されたというように伝えられている。
外見的にはたいへんそっくりであり、どうも北海道での建築者の松浦さんと
この福島の「小野家」さんとは地縁的繋がりがあるように想像できる。
余談ですが福島の小野ということで小野小町伝承とも関連があるのかも（笑）。
昨日データ復元依頼先から連絡があり、復元不可能とのこと。
深く落ち込んでおります。
しかし諦めることなく、SSDディスク購入の大型店舗に連絡して
その会社のカード利用履歴などから間違いなく「購入履歴」が認証されたので
その大型店からメーカーに対応依頼をしてもらいました。
直接何度も電話していたのですが、数十回電話しても常に「話し中」で
一向にラチが開かないということからの窮余の一策。
これがようやく風穴を開けて、意思疎通が可能になっています。
準備を整えて本日、本体と説明文書などを添えて送付予定。
サードパーティのデータ復元事業者では不可能とされましたが、
製造責任メーカー側の対応がどうか、一縷の期待をもって祈念している次第。
しかし、購入して３ヶ月程度しか経過していなくて出張移動といっても
落下などの衝撃も加わっていない状況で認識されなくなるというのは
ユーザーの常識から考えてちょっと納得いかない。
一般的にデジタルデータにはバックアップ必要という注意は理解できるけれど
ユーザー側として、すべてのデータについて常時バックアップなどありえない。
実際に失われてみるとこれはいかに不安定な社会インフラであることか、
ユーザーの自己責任論があまりにも過剰ではと不信になる。
ということですが、ブログ連載については匿名氏からの情報バックアップが
大いに力づけになってくれてもおりますので、
人情に感謝も込めて頑張っていきたいと思っています。
捨てる神あれば拾う神あり、か（笑）。
English version⬇
Style Change from Fukushima to Asahikawa: Sericultural Houses in East Asahikawa - 6
The houses that remain in Fukushima, my hometown, are compared and contrasted with Asahikawa's sericultural houses. The change in style is visible and stimulates the imagination. The visitor can feel the God who discards and the God who picks up. The house in the village of Fukushima
This Higashi Asahikawa sericultural minka was built in 1905 by an immigrant from the suburbs of Date City, Fukushima Prefecture.
This Asahikawa, Hokkaido, is a transplant of the sericultural minka architecture of his hometown.
Naturally, I would be interested in similar architecture in my hometown.
This information was also provided by an anonymous source. There is a minka garden in Fukushima prefecture.
I found a picture of a silkworm-raising house with a similar architectural function there.
I found a picture of it on the Internet and modified it to make it easier to see.
The first and fourth images are the front side and the gable side.
The first two are Fukushima and the rest are Asahikawa.
In Fukushima, the front side has an exterior porch on both the first and second floors on the south side of the front elevation.
In Asahikawa, this is separated by external fittings with glass.
In Fukushima Prefecture, there is a bit of snow in the photo.
Of course, the Asahikawa Basin in the northern part of Hokkaido is subjected to extremely cold and snowy conditions.
It is accepted that the style is evolving to suit the region.
On the other hand, on the gable side, a shed was attached in Fukushima, pictured above, but
On the other hand, on the gable side, the Fukushima building in the photo above has an attached shed, while the Asahikawa building in the photo below was torn down because its structure could not withstand the snow accumulation.
The two houses are very similar in appearance, and it is likely that Mr. Matsuura, the builder in Hokkaido, and the "Ono Family" in Fukushima are the same person.
It seems that there is a geographical connection between Mr. Matsuura, an architect in Hokkaido, and the "Ono Family" in Fukushima.
As a side note, Ono in Fukushima may be related to Ono Komachi folklore as well (laugh).
Yesterday, I received a call from the company that requested data recovery and was told that the data could not be recovered.
I am deeply depressed.
However, I did not give up and contacted the large store where I purchased the SSD disk.
The company's credit card usage history and other information definitely verified the "purchase history", so I contacted the large store where I purchased the SSD disk.
I asked that large store to send a request to the manufacturer for a response.
I called them directly several times, but they were always "busy" even after dozens of calls.
This was a desperate measure because we were never able to reach the manufacturer.
This has finally opened a windfall and communication is now possible.
The unit is ready and will be sent today with the unit and explanatory documents, etc.
We were told this was not possible with a third-party data recovery provider.
I am praying with a ray of hope that the manufacturer responsible for manufacturing the product will be able to do something about it.
However, it has been only about 3 months since I purchased it, and even though it is a business trip, it has not been moved yet.
However, it is a little unacceptable from the common sense of users that the device is not recognized after only three months of purchase and without any impact such as being dropped or moved on a business trip.
It is a little unconvincing from a user's point of view.
I understand the general caution that digital data needs to be backed up, but I am not convinced that this is the case.
However, it is impossible for a user to always back up all data.
When you actually lose your data, you realize how insecure the social infrastructure is, and you realize that you are not responsible for the loss.
I distrust that the user's self-responsibility theory is too much.
I am very grateful to Mr. Anonymous for his information backup for the blog series.
I am grateful for the support of anonymous users and will continue to do my best.
I would like to do my best with gratitude for the humanity.
Where there is a God, there is a God, right?
