Does the community which goes through the democracy need a Chinese Communist Party government?
A state chief in the Communist Party of China was reported to have actuated " the 7 corner taboo " 令 before to the Chinese whole in " the Tiananmen Square incident 24 anniversary " on June 4th yesterday.
This " the 7 corner taboo "
(1)
" Universal value of the human race "
(2)
" Liberty of the report "
(3)
" Democratic society "
(4)
" Right of the citizen "
(5)
" Communist Party of China's historic mistake "
(6)
" Privilege proprietary classes "
(7)
" Independence of the judiciary "
Saying that it is
( 5/24 The Chinese watching of the Souma win )
How will it be?
The Chinese Communist Party government is as this word.
" Don't touch the universal value of the human race ".
" Don't aim at democratic society ".
" Don't increase right consciousness of the Chinese citizen ".
" Don't touch Communist Party of China's historic mistake and aristocracy system ".
It is the fact to aim at the state " not to admit those reports even in the independence of the judiciary without permitting them ".
It is a great party autarchic.
How will it be?
Does the top of the state remark that it is overt in this way and the right which the country not to hesitate about can refuse a resolution why in United Nations Security Council will it have?
Will 1,400,000,000 Chinese citizens have no choice but to yield in front of this word without having any doubts?
Will it be a fact of " the community can be prostrated about the decisionmaking in the country of the party dictatorship "?
It is the first on the list of the seven wonders of the present-day international politics really and there is not reason which such a country says history in Japan to critically absolutely.
Also, if there is not liberty which refers to the universal value of the human race, it is an international researchs in the future and there are not given meanings such as the prominent result.
Moreover, there is not a meaning that the international consciousness of the human rights sprouts up at the Chinese citizen.
It will be possible to say that the Chinese citizen who gets education in this country is in the traged really.
Under present condition, because there are not any meaning which it is possible to learn in the history in old the Soviet Union where the state collapsed according to the spoiling of the aristocracy, the being feelings such as the generalization of 64 pieces of Tiananmen Square incident are the meaning which is not.
Does the community which goes through the democracy need a Chinese Communist Party government really?
Wanting to start the conference to verify " Charter of United Nations " in the comparison with this " the 7 corner taboo " in the General Assembly of UN
It isn't absolutely realized because China refuses in?
Security Council and under present condition, the United Nations doesn't change forever to the extent that? becomes.
A state chief in the Communist Party of China was reported to have actuated " the 7 corner taboo " 令 before to the Chinese whole in " the Tiananmen Square incident 24 anniversary " on June 4th yesterday.
This " the 7 corner taboo "
(1)
" Universal value of the human race "
(2)
" Liberty of the report "
(3)
" Democratic society "
(4)
" Right of the citizen "
(5)
" Communist Party of China's historic mistake "
(6)
" Privilege proprietary classes "
(7)
" Independence of the judiciary "
Saying that it is
( 5/24 The Chinese watching of the Souma win )
How will it be?
The Chinese Communist Party government is as this word.
" Don't touch the universal value of the human race ".
" Don't aim at democratic society ".
" Don't increase right consciousness of the Chinese citizen ".
" Don't touch Communist Party of China's historic mistake and aristocracy system ".
It is the fact to aim at the state " not to admit those reports even in the independence of the judiciary without permitting them ".
It is a great party autarchic.
How will it be?
Does the top of the state remark that it is overt in this way and the right which the country not to hesitate about can refuse a resolution why in United Nations Security Council will it have?
Will 1,400,000,000 Chinese citizens have no choice but to yield in front of this word without having any doubts?
Will it be a fact of " the community can be prostrated about the decisionmaking in the country of the party dictatorship "?
It is the first on the list of the seven wonders of the present-day international politics really and there is not reason which such a country says history in Japan to critically absolutely.
Also, if there is not liberty which refers to the universal value of the human race, it is an international researchs in the future and there are not given meanings such as the prominent result.
Moreover, there is not a meaning that the international consciousness of the human rights sprouts up at the Chinese citizen.
It will be possible to say that the Chinese citizen who gets education in this country is in the traged really.
Under present condition, because there are not any meaning which it is possible to learn in the history in old the Soviet Union where the state collapsed according to the spoiling of the aristocracy, the being feelings such as the generalization of 64 pieces of Tiananmen Square incident are the meaning which is not.
Does the community which goes through the democracy need a Chinese Communist Party government really?
Wanting to start the conference to verify " Charter of United Nations " in the comparison with this " the 7 corner taboo " in the General Assembly of UN
It isn't absolutely realized because China refuses in?
Security Council and under present condition, the United Nations doesn't change forever to the extent that? becomes.
