可能性が低減された

衝撃による破損の可能性が低減された車両用ライト。

ChatGPT:

"A vehicle light with a reduced likelihood of damage due to impact."

Key Translation Points:

• 「衝撃による」→「due to impact」
  • Specifies the cause of potential damage.
• 「破損の可能性」→「likelihood of damage」
  • "Likelihood" conveys the probability aspect, keeping it natural.
• 「低減された」→「with a reduced likelihood」
  • Keeps the passive nuance while making the phrase flow naturally.
• 「車両用ライト」→「vehicle light」
  • General but precise term for a light used in vehicles.

Let me know if you prefer a different nuance, such as emphasizing the structural design that reduces damage!

あなた:

How about 1. A vehicle light that has a reduced likelihood of damage due to impact. 2. A vehicle light of which the likelihood of damage due to impact is reduced.

 

ChatGPT:

Both of your options are grammatically correct, but the first one sounds more natural and commonly used in technical descriptions. Here's my assessment:

1. "A vehicle light that has a reduced likelihood of damage due to impact."

   • This is natural and clear.
   • "That has" makes it easy to read and avoids awkward phrasing.
   • Commonly used in technical English and product descriptions.

2. "A vehicle light of which the likelihood of damage due to impact is reduced."

   • This structure is grammatically correct but slightly awkward.
   • "Of which" is less commonly used in modern technical English.
   • The sentence sounds more formal and less fluid than the first one.

Recommendation:

The first option is better for naturalness and readability.

If you want a slightly more concise and formal version:
✅ "A vehicle light with a reduced likelihood of damage due to impact."

Would you like to emphasize any particular aspect, such as structural design or shock absorption?