Which of the following sentence structure is preferable?
1. A device including A and B, the device characterized in that ....
2. A device including A and B, the device being characterized in that ....
ChatGPT:
Between the two structures, Option 2 ("A device including A and B, the device being characterized in that ...") is preferable in formal technical writing, especially in patent specifications. Here’s why:
-
Clarity and Formality:
- "the device being characterized in that ..." clearly links the defining characteristics of the device to the prior clause in a grammatically smooth and precise way.
- This construction aligns with common legal and technical writing styles, ensuring clarity.
-
Avoiding Potential Ambiguity:
- In Option 1, "the device characterized in that ..." might be misinterpreted as an awkward phrase, as "characterized in that" typically follows a verb or participial phrase.
-
Standard Patent Language:
- The phrase "being characterized in that" is widely used in patent documents to introduce the defining technical features of the invention.
Alternative:
If brevity is preferred while maintaining clarity, you could also consider:
- "A device including A and B, characterized in that ..."
(This eliminates the second mention of "the device" while keeping the sentence formally correct.)
Would you like further refinements based on specific contexts?
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます