The following is from an article by critic Seki-hei in this month's issue of Sound Argument, titled "Beijing Virus," which is the most dangerous.
This month's issue of Sound Argument is full of real articles, especially on the corona disaster.
It is bizarre that the TV media, which does not even read these genuine articles, continues to report as if it were journalism.
This book is a must-read not only for the Japanese people but also for people worldwide.
People who want to know the truth about the corona disaster must go to their nearest bookstore and subscribe right now.
This article is so genuine that it makes me laugh out loud in several places.
It is no exaggeration to say that what the Chinese government and Tedros are doing is a show of outskirts that will continuously make the audience laugh.
As it were, Mr. Seki-hei is the author of WHO and China's (Xi Jinping's) Rural Playbook (Blatant theatrics.... . no exaggeration to call it an acting contest between naked kings) without mercy.
On January 14 this year, a World Health Organization (WHO) survey team entered Wuhan's Chinese city, where the new coronavirus was first identified in the world.
The purpose of the team's investigation in Wuhan was, of course, to find the source of the coronavirus.
However, I thought from the beginning that it would probably fail.
The research team arrived in Wuhan more than a year after the outbreak and spread of the new coronavirus in this metropolis.
No police force would be foolish enough to postpone the on-site inspection of a traffic accident or criminal incident to a year later.
What is the WHO team going to investigate in Wuhan now?
There are two possible reasons for such a delay in the WHO's field investigation.
One is that the Director-General of the WHO, Dr. Tedros, who has always been considerate of China, is unwilling to do the field survey from the beginning, and the other is that the Chinese government itself does not want to be surveyed.
These two reasons probably worked in tandem to delay the field survey for more than a year.
The people conducting the investigation do not want to do it in the first place, and the people being investigated do not wish to be examined in the first place.
It seems to me that both parties' intentions coincided to create a gap of over a year.
If this is the case, then how did the field investigation come about now?
There were probably two reasons.
One reason is that both the Chinese government and the WHO recognized the need to conduct a "field survey" at least once to avoid criticism from the international community.
In the case of the WHO not conducting even one field investigation in Wuhan, it would be the negligence of its duties. The international community would criticize it. Suppose China refuses to conduct on-site research for any length of time. In that case, it will not only expose itself to severe criticism from the international community but will also be unable to dispel the suspicion of the international community regarding the "Wuhan outbreak of the virus.
That is why the Chinese government probably wanted to accept the "on-site investigation" and settle the matter in a way that would be convenient for them.
However, in doing so, the Chinese government must not let the WHO investigation team find out about the "Wuhan outbreak of coronavirus.
Therefore, the Chinese government has accepted the WHO investigation team now because it is convinced that the WHO investigation is no longer "worrisome" since the Chinese side has already completed the cover-up and destruction of evidence in more than a year so far.
As of January 18, 2021, when I am writing this article, I am not sure what the WHO's field survey team's final results will be.
I can say for sure that it is unlikely that the survey team will find that Wuhan is the source of the coronavirus as a result of their investigation.
It is because the Chinese government has accepted the WHO's investigation precisely because they have made all possible preparations to ensure that they will not be able to "find out" anything.
Of course, "all preparations" in this case does not mean the preparation of evidence or testimony, but just the opposite, the complete destruction of all evidence.
This article continues.
