The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
The Moon regime's control of information
Now, the Moon regime is trying to deceive the Korean people as well.
To achieve red reunification, the government does not want to give out any unfavorable information.
In the past, South Korea looked at China and thought, "I feel sorry for them because they are restricting the Internet, controlling information, and even compressing speech." Still, ironically, now they are facing the same thing.
The Moon regime is rapidly advancing its information control.
On February 11, it was reported that the South Korean authorities had hired a private contractor to install software to block websites.
It is said that this was introduced "to block illegal overseas websites." On March 3, this time, Park Guan-on, the top member of the Special Committee on Countermeasures against False Manipulation of Information, who is also known for having initiated the "Law on the Prohibition of Distortion of History," demanded that Google Korea delete nine videos and apologize for them, including one that portrayed comfort women as "prostitutes who receive high remuneration.
Even if it is true, it is a typical Korean tactic to say that condemnation of Korea is hate, while condemnation of Japan is freedom of expression.
*The time has come for the Japanese people to realize that the attitude of this Korean tactic and that of the so-called cultural figures who are sympathetic to it, such as the Asahi Shimbun, are precisely the same.*
I know of five videos related to comfort women that have been deleted.
It is not the person who made the video, but the footage re-uploaded by the user who liked it is deleted.
What on earth does this mean?
The more subscribers a user has to a channel, the more attention they will get.
Therefore, small channels that basically don't make videos and only allow people to watch and comment on them are not viewed by the user manipulators, for better or worse.
However, the current Korean government frequently searches for content that focuses on "comfort women" and content that affirms the "era of Japanese occupation."
Therefore, regardless of the number of registered users, videos are being deleted without regard to the number of users.
Similar to the Law Against Distortion of History, this restriction on YouTube videos has hardly been reported publicly in Korea.
It is in the online news, but it is in a place where you have to go about five pages to see it, and it is not very noticeable at all.
Today, South Korea is also brazenly restricting the press.
Supreme Councilor Park is not well known in Korea, and before the current uproar, he was not mentioned at all.
He has his own YouTube channel, "Google! Respect the history of the Republic of Korea." He also posted a video on his YouTube channel.
It is apparent that he is trying to use his anti-Japan stance to raise his own status.
By standing out here, he may be aiming to become the next president.
This manuscript continues.