The preceding chapter sequel
The preamble abbreviation
Fackler
I feel both of the sense of expectation and “the feeling irritated “to Japan from this report.
If seeing from the U.S., Japan is in the Asian strategy and the change doesn't lie in playing a most valuable role.
Nevertheless, the politics in Japan is paralytic for a long time and is declining slowly.
It will be feeling such as why to cause an unnecessary history problem in addition to it.
As for the minimum wish in the U.S., the problem is the fact to wish not to cause.
The U.S. is wished to become a grown-up country to Japan in the ally.
Magosaki
Now, it said an ally but as for me, the word is not in the preference too much.
Because, it is because there is not possibility to need in the equal form in military power's and economic power's having differential.
Is the U.S. the top of the place to have admitted independence in being certain degree of, Japan and will it expect some contribution?
Or, is it looking for achieving a feature as the dependency?
If saying my conclusion, the U.S. is looking only for achieving the feature which is subordinate to Japan even if it makes TPP and it makes security.
Fackler
Of course, it doesn't think that the economic power and the military power are different and that the U.S. and Japan are in fully equal shoes.
However, it doesn't tell that it is subordinate particularly.
Realistically, Japan are not the grown-up country which was independent, depending on America.
Magosaki
The past when for Japan to let's be independent, there was to have tried many times.
For example, it is “the East Asia collective conception “under Hatoyama administration.
However, the U.S. Department of Defense high-up “threatened openly and squarely”, saying he “took a retaliatory action probably if feeling that country was removed ".
Regrettably, the U.S. isn't seeing Japan as the independent ally and is regarding only as the purse, i.e. the ATM which does money.
Fackler
It thinks that the human being in the Department of Defense has consciousness, “it is possible to follow the U.S. “which Magosaki says.
Only, the Department of Defense is not an opinion in the whole U.S.
Therefore, first, it begins because it decides directionality in its country and it is …….
The omission
Magosaki
Excuse me
However, to decide directionality, there is a big fault.
Now, there is a channel to the U.S. in Japan only about the part high-up, i.e. “Japan Handler “in the Department of Defense.
It is fancied to hear their opinion in the important aspect and to be the opinion of the U.S. government by it, and it ponders and it has done a self-restraint.
When trying to give the policy which was independent of the U.S., it is always bathed in the bashing in the country.
The identity of this Handler is an illiberal interest group only but is …….
Fackler
As it says it
It is because a channel is decided that the Japanese-American relations become grotesque.
Now, the people by whom the U.S. government has power are not Japan Handler.
It had been written in the report, too, but that lobbying in Korea and China was good made appeal various people beyond such frame and put American public opinion to make as an ally.
.
Magosaki
Now, it said a very important thing.
The recognition is not in Japan.
Then, it is the fact that it must not be popular as far as there is not a direct conviction that is important above all in companion's disliking in the diplomacy.
It should be possible to write its political life.
However, there is not the risk; too, in Liberal Democratic Party and it is stimulating China and Korea halfway only.
Fackler
Surely, it is.
But the opinion resembled gradually (The laughter)
The omit the last part
The preamble abbreviation
Fackler
I feel both of the sense of expectation and “the feeling irritated “to Japan from this report.
If seeing from the U.S., Japan is in the Asian strategy and the change doesn't lie in playing a most valuable role.
Nevertheless, the politics in Japan is paralytic for a long time and is declining slowly.
It will be feeling such as why to cause an unnecessary history problem in addition to it.
As for the minimum wish in the U.S., the problem is the fact to wish not to cause.
The U.S. is wished to become a grown-up country to Japan in the ally.
Magosaki
Now, it said an ally but as for me, the word is not in the preference too much.
Because, it is because there is not possibility to need in the equal form in military power's and economic power's having differential.
Is the U.S. the top of the place to have admitted independence in being certain degree of, Japan and will it expect some contribution?
Or, is it looking for achieving a feature as the dependency?
If saying my conclusion, the U.S. is looking only for achieving the feature which is subordinate to Japan even if it makes TPP and it makes security.
Fackler
Of course, it doesn't think that the economic power and the military power are different and that the U.S. and Japan are in fully equal shoes.
However, it doesn't tell that it is subordinate particularly.
Realistically, Japan are not the grown-up country which was independent, depending on America.
Magosaki
The past when for Japan to let's be independent, there was to have tried many times.
For example, it is “the East Asia collective conception “under Hatoyama administration.
However, the U.S. Department of Defense high-up “threatened openly and squarely”, saying he “took a retaliatory action probably if feeling that country was removed ".
Regrettably, the U.S. isn't seeing Japan as the independent ally and is regarding only as the purse, i.e. the ATM which does money.
Fackler
It thinks that the human being in the Department of Defense has consciousness, “it is possible to follow the U.S. “which Magosaki says.
Only, the Department of Defense is not an opinion in the whole U.S.
Therefore, first, it begins because it decides directionality in its country and it is …….
The omission
Magosaki
Excuse me
However, to decide directionality, there is a big fault.
Now, there is a channel to the U.S. in Japan only about the part high-up, i.e. “Japan Handler “in the Department of Defense.
It is fancied to hear their opinion in the important aspect and to be the opinion of the U.S. government by it, and it ponders and it has done a self-restraint.
When trying to give the policy which was independent of the U.S., it is always bathed in the bashing in the country.
The identity of this Handler is an illiberal interest group only but is …….
Fackler
As it says it
It is because a channel is decided that the Japanese-American relations become grotesque.
Now, the people by whom the U.S. government has power are not Japan Handler.
It had been written in the report, too, but that lobbying in Korea and China was good made appeal various people beyond such frame and put American public opinion to make as an ally.
.
Magosaki
Now, it said a very important thing.
The recognition is not in Japan.
Then, it is the fact that it must not be popular as far as there is not a direct conviction that is important above all in companion's disliking in the diplomacy.
It should be possible to write its political life.
However, there is not the risk; too, in Liberal Democratic Party and it is stimulating China and Korea halfway only.
Fackler
Surely, it is.
But the opinion resembled gradually (The laughter)
The omit the last part