The sentences are from the claim (the editorial) of the Sankei Shimbun today.
The statement which the visiting friend talked about to me yesterday was written.
Of the discussion with the historical fact of the prejudice pulling-out
It released the statement which 187 Japanese researchers centered on the Europe and America make "it will leave a checkout without the prejudice" and so on about the comfort woman problem.
Surely, this problem has continued to be made fool of by the prejudice and the political consideration.
It is natural that only having a historical fact should be argued.
But, the statement demands "a bold action" from Prime Minister Shinzo Abe as "the women can not change the fact of the history to have had the dignity robbed" while it makes the Korean side claim recede substantially.
It cannot help receiving with the request which doesn't have an argument.
As for the statement, it didn't specify the number of the comfort women whom the Korean side makes "equal to or more than 200,000" with "probably, that a forever correct number is fixed relents" and it didn't use the term which was seen with the conventional documents such as "the sex slave", too.
There is a description "which was distorted by the irresponsible utterance" having to do with "a racism in Korea and China, too", too.
Focus "on the specific term and repeat a narrow legal discussion" about "the compulsoriness" which the Japanese side denies avoided a judgement, saying "the ignoring of a wide context".
It supposed "being supported by the public material, too, in the one which resorts to the heart as a whole" while the testimony of the previous comfort woman was various and admitted that the memory didn't have a consistence, too.
The typical document which gathered the testimony of the comfort woman will be Commission on Human Rights’ "the Coomaraswamy report".
This report adopts the testimony of the Mr. Yoshida Seiji who canceled an article by Asahi Shimbun's admitting a false report and there is much one-sided testimony in the others, too.
Asahi Shimbun replaced "of the essence facing up to" "the core doesn't change" and so on, and a problem while it admitted the mistake and the misuse of the individual article about the comfort woman problem.
Doesn't the plot of the statement by the researchers resemble this closely?
At U.S. major education publishing company "McGraw-Hill's" world's history textbook, it is "the Japanese military drafted compulsorily because it is possible to work about 200,000 women in the consolation place".
There is a description of "it devoted a comfort woman to the army as the gift from the emperor" and so on.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs demanded correction but 19 scholars in the U.S. which contains an author issued the statement to refuse correction.
The researcher who signed a statement in these 19 and this time overlaps.
If not having a basis having to do with a conviction about "200,000" and "the compulsion taking", as for the researchers, first, to make efforts for the correction of the U.S. textbook and the Coomaraswamy report would be a logic.