The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
There are many things in your comments that are new to many people.
There is nothing more valuable than the truth.
A self-proclaimed writer who does not admit to his mistakes or reflect on them
A self-proclaimed journalist who does not do any research
As the Japan Conservative Party started with the Arita/Hyakuta duo, whom I personally distrusted, I initially thought that Ms. Iiyama was the same kind of person.
As I was overseas for over 20 years, I can understand how people would form a preconception that all Japanese conservatives are like this just from the name of the party.
It's a shame, but that something like this is coming out as a political party shows that the world is ending.
Ms. Iiyama, please keep up the good work no matter what they say.
I am a little younger than Ms. Arimoto, and when she worked at Kinki Nippon Tourist, I worked at JTB.
It was well-known in the industry that she was a chronic latecomer, and I also knew that Mr. Nikaido had a lot of power in the tourism industry.
Tokyo University of Foreign Studies... Oh, so it's the Hindi department?
You could get in back then even if your deviation value were in the 50s.
I don't judge people based on their academic background or anything...
You could get in back then even if your deviation value were in the 50s.
I don't judge people based on their academic background or anything...
I read it in X.
"The episode of Emperor Nintoku's people's hearth, which was written in 'Nihon Koku Ki' by the duo of Hyakuta and Arimoto six years ago, was almost a copy-and-paste situation, with only minor changes made to the text written by someone else." That's right.
They were forced to make corrections in later publications.
I knew he wrote the Nihon Koku Ki, but I didn't know.
Even after the Jun'ai affair, he wouldn't learn his lesson.
His mask is being peeled off more and more.
As I thought, God is watching you!
Arimoto-baasan is vicious and her pride is too high.
I also felt that the two people in question and those who supported them lacked an "objective perspective."
Regardless of the intention behind a statement, people's reactions to it can vary greatly.
As someone who works in politics, you must consider how most of the general public with different values will perceive your statements.
I remember Dr. Iiyama once saying that conveying conservative values can't be done in a way that would turn off ordinary people, but that's exactly the kind of perspective that is lacking.
Who would vote for someone who says that people who don't understand are stupid or idiots?
I'm sure he would be utterly unacceptable to anyone other than his followers.
This article continues.