生命哲学/生物哲学/生活哲学ブログ

《生命/生物、生活》を、システム的かつ体系的に、分析し総合し統合する。射程域:哲学、美術音楽詩、政治経済社会、秘教

学問修行2018年8月18日(土)-1 読書録/渡辺正博 2017/11 脳の意識 機械の意識

2018年08月18日 20時51分21秒 | 読書録
学問修行2018年8月18日(土)-1
読書録/渡辺正博 2017/11 脳の意識 機械の意識

渡辺正博.2017/11/25.脳の意識 機械の意識.317頁.中央公論新社.[中公新書 2460][本体920円+税][購入20180813、943円]


 1. 意識経験を定義するのに、クオリア qaulia を持ち出しているが、そこで使われているクオリアは、「質」または「質感」を問題にしていない。客観的な、たとえば画像である。紹介されている実験でも、被験者にモニター画面での画像を見させている。

 2.


  「
Qualia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[omitted]

In philosophy and certain models of psychology, qualia (/ˈkwɑːliə/ or /ˈkweɪliə/; singular form: quale) are defined to be individual instances of subjective, conscious experience. The term qualia derives from the Latin neuter plural form (qualia) of the Latin adjective quālis (Latin pronunciation: [ˈkʷaːlɪs]) meaning "of what sort" or "of what kind" in a specific instance like "what it is like to taste a specific apple, this particular apple now".

Examples of qualia include the perceived sensation of pain of a headache, the taste of wine, as well as the redness of an evening sky. As qualitative characters of sensation, qualia stand in contrast to "propositional attitudes",[1] where the focus is on beliefs about experience rather than what it is directly like to be experiencing.

Philosopher and cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett once suggested that qualia was "an unfamiliar term for something that could not be more familiar to each of us: the ways things seem to us".[2]

Much of the debate over their importance hinges on the definition of the term, and various philosophers emphasize or deny the existence of certain features of qualia. Consequently, the nature and existence of various definitions of qualia remains controversial due to qualia not being a pragmatically verifiable matter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualia[受信:2018年8月18日(土)。]