Asahi Shimbun came to invent a pretext for a quarrel as it is not only that.

The following is from the special column of Mr. Takayama Masayuki, the one and only journalist in the world after postwar which is published in the weekly magazine Shincho this week.

I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline.

Infection source is Japanese

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that Tamiflu, a special medicine for influenza, could be used for children.

Every paper reported, but it did not write only the Asahi Shimbun.

Perhaps still a sense of shame left still, the pharmacists had a big laugh.

Tamiflu entered the market as a decade and a half ago as a medicine.

It worked well truly when prescribing for the child who is delirious to the high heat.

Asahi Shimbun came to invent a pretext for a quarrel as it is not only that.

Junior high school student in Aichi jumped off from the window of the 9th floor apartment and died.

In Gifu, a high school student jumped out of bed, ran in barefoot along the snowy road, died after being run over the truck.

Such a case happened over here and there.

The Asahi newspaper wrote convincingly with 'harmful effects of a medicine' and kicked up a row, 'While noticing that, neither the pharmaceutical company nor the government office did anything'.

It instigated and caused an appeal, 'Poor parents who were deprived of their children unreasonably.'

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare restricted Tamiflu's prescription unavoidably during the trial.

Many children died for it.

However, in the medical world the word thermal delirium is evident.

It is 'it is delirious from the heat' in other words easy.

Lose consciousness with high fever, many people have experience of staggering outside when you notice.

Because the judge is not stupid, the parent loses.

The Asahi Shimbun instigated a poor parent by unjust decision or jeer and brought it to the Supreme Court, but the result was the same.

There were bankruptcy plaintiffs who could no longer issue a stamp fee for final appeal.

Two years since the appeal was kicked out, the removal of a ban declaration of Tamiflu by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare shows that it was a deliberate misinformation of the Asahi Newspaper.

But the Asahi Shimbun's malice coverage is not only this.

At the same time as this lawsuit lung cancer specific medicine Iressa also campaigned phytotoxicity campaign to manipulate the patient bereaved, and the Asahi made them bring an action.

Iressa is a cancer treatment developed by a UK pharmaceutical company.

It aimed at so-called apoptotic effect which promotes suicide to non-normal cells such as cancer, but Caucasian has no medicinal effect.

So, it is an unapproved drug in Europe and the US, but somehow it worked for the Japanese.

Serious side effects were also within 1%.

The Japanese will do whites do not do.

Asahi hates that kind of thought of Japanese people,

It is 'approval too early',

It is 'unexpected dead and dead due to side effects',

It kicked up a row that it is unacceptable phytotoxicity,

Instigate the patient bereaved up to the Supreme Court, but the result it was also losing.

It is the manipulated foolish complainants that lose, being defeated only and there is not loss in the Asahi.

This draft continues.

It worked well truly when prescribing for the child who is delirious to the high heat

The following is from the special column of Mr. Takayama Masayuki, the one and only journalist in the world after postwar which is published in the weekly magazine Shincho this week.

I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline.

Infection source is Japanese

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that Tamiflu, a special medicine for influenza, could be used for children.

Every paper reported, but it did not write only the Asahi Shimbun.

Perhaps still a sense of shame left still, the pharmacists had a big laugh.

Tamiflu entered the market as a decade and a half ago as a medicine.

It worked well truly when prescribing for the child who is delirious to the high heat.

Asahi Shimbun came to invent a pretext for a quarrel as it is not only that.

Junior high school student in Aichi jumped off from the window of the 9th floor apartment and died.

In Gifu, a high school student jumped out of bed, ran in barefoot along the snowy road, died after being run over the truck.

Such a case happened over here and there.

The Asahi newspaper wrote convincingly with 'harmful effects of a medicine' and kicked up a row, 'While noticing that, neither the pharmaceutical company nor the government office did anything'.

It instigated and caused an appeal, 'Poor parents who were deprived of their children unreasonably.'

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare restricted Tamiflu's prescription unavoidably during the trial.

Many children died for it.

However, in the medical world the word thermal delirium is evident.

It is 'it is delirious from the heat' in other words easy.

Lose consciousness with high fever, many people have experience of staggering outside when you notice.

Because the judge is not stupid, the parent loses.

The Asahi Shimbun instigated a poor parent by unjust decision or jeer and brought it to the Supreme Court, but the result was the same.

There were bankruptcy plaintiffs who could no longer issue a stamp fee for final appeal.

Two years since the appeal was kicked out, the removal of a ban declaration of Tamiflu by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare shows that it was a deliberate misinformation of the Asahi Newspaper.

But the Asahi Shimbun's malice coverage is not only this.

At the same time as this lawsuit lung cancer specific medicine Iressa also campaigned phytotoxicity campaign to manipulate the patient bereaved, and the Asahi made them bring an action.

Iressa is a cancer treatment developed by a UK pharmaceutical company.

It aimed at so-called apoptotic effect which promotes suicide to non-normal cells such as cancer, but Caucasian has no medicinal effect.

So, it is an unapproved drug in Europe and the US, but somehow it worked for the Japanese.

Serious side effects were also within 1%.

The Japanese will do whites do not do.

Asahi hates that kind of thought of Japanese people,

It is 'approval too early',

It is 'unexpected dead and dead due to side effects',

It kicked up a row that it is unacceptable phytotoxicity,

Instigate the patient bereaved up to the Supreme Court, but the result it was also losing.

It is the manipulated foolish complainants that lose, being defeated only and there is not loss in the Asahi.

This draft continues.

wrote convincingly with 'harmful effects of a medicine' and kicked up a row,

The following is from the special column of Mr. Takayama Masayuki, the one and only journalist in the world after postwar which is published in the weekly magazine Shincho this week.

I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline.

Infection source is Japanese

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that Tamiflu, a special medicine for influenza, could be used for children.

Every paper reported, but it did not write only the Asahi Shimbun.

Perhaps still a sense of shame left still, the pharmacists had a big laugh.

Tamiflu entered the market as a decade and a half ago as a medicine.

It worked well truly when prescribing for the child who is delirious to the high heat.

Asahi Shimbun came to invent a pretext for a quarrel as it is not only that.

Junior high school student in Aichi jumped off from the window of the 9th floor apartment and died.

In Gifu, a high school student jumped out of bed, ran in barefoot along the snowy road, died after being run over the truck.

Such a case happened over here and there.

The Asahi newspaper wrote convincingly with 'harmful effects of a medicine' and kicked up a row, 'While noticing that, neither the pharmaceutical company nor the government office did anything'.

It instigated and caused an appeal, 'Poor parents who were deprived of their children unreasonably.'

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare restricted Tamiflu's prescription unavoidably during the trial.

Many children died for it.

However, in the medical world the word thermal delirium is evident.

It is 'it is delirious from the heat' in other words easy.

Lose consciousness with high fever, many people have experience of staggering outside when you notice.

Because the judge is not stupid, the parent loses.

The Asahi Shimbun instigated a poor parent by unjust decision or jeer and brought it to the Supreme Court, but the result was the same.

There were bankruptcy plaintiffs who could no longer issue a stamp fee for final appeal.

Two years since the appeal was kicked out, the removal of a ban declaration of Tamiflu by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare shows that it was a deliberate misinformation of the Asahi Newspaper.

But the Asahi Shimbun's malice coverage is not only this.

At the same time as this lawsuit lung cancer specific medicine Iressa also campaigned phytotoxicity campaign to manipulate the patient bereaved, and the Asahi made them bring an action.

Iressa is a cancer treatment developed by a UK pharmaceutical company.

It aimed at so-called apoptotic effect which promotes suicide to non-normal cells such as cancer, but Caucasian has no medicinal effect.

So, it is an unapproved drug in Europe and the US, but somehow it worked for the Japanese.

Serious side effects were also within 1%.

The Japanese will do whites do not do.

Asahi hates that kind of thought of Japanese people,

It is 'approval too early',

It is 'unexpected dead and dead due to side effects',

It kicked up a row that it is unacceptable phytotoxicity,

Instigate the patient bereaved up to the Supreme Court, but the result it was also losing.

It is the manipulated foolish complainants that lose, being defeated only and there is not loss in the Asahi.

This draft continues.

Perhaps still a sense of shame left still, the pharmacists had a big laugh.

The following is from the special column of Mr. Takayama Masayuki, the one and only journalist in the world after postwar which is published in the weekly magazine Shincho this week.

I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline.

Infection source is Japanese

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that Tamiflu, a special medicine for influenza, could be used for children.

Every paper reported, but it did not write only the Asahi Shimbun.

Perhaps still a sense of shame left still, the pharmacists had a big laugh.

Tamiflu entered the market as a decade and a half ago as a medicine.

It worked well truly when prescribing for the child who is delirious to the high heat.

Asahi Shimbun came to invent a pretext for a quarrel as it is not only that.

Junior high school student in Aichi jumped off from the window of the 9th floor apartment and died.

In Gifu, a high school student jumped out of bed, ran in barefoot along the snowy road, died after being run over the truck.

Such a case happened over here and there.

The Asahi newspaper wrote convincingly with 'harmful effects of a medicine' and kicked up a row, 'While noticing that, neither the pharmaceutical company nor the government office did anything'.

It instigated and caused an appeal, 'Poor parents who were deprived of their children unreasonably.'

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare restricted Tamiflu's prescription unavoidably during the trial.

Many children died for it.

However, in the medical world the word thermal delirium is evident.

It is 'it is delirious from the heat' in other words easy.

Lose consciousness with high fever, many people have experience of staggering outside when you notice.

Because the judge is not stupid, the parent loses.

The Asahi Shimbun instigated a poor parent by unjust decision or jeer and brought it to the Supreme Court, but the result was the same.

There were bankruptcy plaintiffs who could no longer issue a stamp fee for final appeal.

Two years since the appeal was kicked out, the removal of a ban declaration of Tamiflu by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare shows that it was a deliberate misinformation of the Asahi Newspaper.

But the Asahi Shimbun's malice coverage is not only this.

At the same time as this lawsuit lung cancer specific medicine Iressa also campaigned phytotoxicity campaign to manipulate the patient bereaved, and the Asahi made them bring an action.

Iressa is a cancer treatment developed by a UK pharmaceutical company.

It aimed at so-called apoptotic effect which promotes suicide to non-normal cells such as cancer, but Caucasian has no medicinal effect.

So, it is an unapproved drug in Europe and the US, but somehow it worked for the Japanese.

Serious side effects were also within 1%.

The Japanese will do whites do not do.

Asahi hates that kind of thought of Japanese people,

It is 'approval too early',

It is 'unexpected dead and dead due to side effects',

It kicked up a row that it is unacceptable phytotoxicity,

Instigate the patient bereaved up to the Supreme Court, but the result it was also losing.

It is the manipulated foolish complainants that lose, being defeated only and there is not loss in the Asahi.

This draft continues.

Every paper reported, but it did not write only the Asahi Shimbun.

The following is from the special column of Mr. Takayama Masayuki, the one and only journalist in the world after postwar which is published in the weekly magazine Shincho this week.

I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline.

Infection source is Japanese

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare announced that Tamiflu, a special medicine for influenza, could be used for children.

Every paper reported, but it did not write only the Asahi Shimbun.

Perhaps still a sense of shame left still, the pharmacists had a big laugh.

Tamiflu entered the market as a decade and a half ago as a medicine.

It worked well truly when prescribing for the child who is delirious to the high heat.

Asahi Shimbun came to invent a pretext for a quarrel as it is not only that.

Junior high school student in Aichi jumped off from the window of the 9th floor apartment and died.

In Gifu, a high school student jumped out of bed, ran in barefoot along the snowy road, died after being run over the truck.

Such a case happened over here and there.

The Asahi newspaper wrote convincingly with 'harmful effects of a medicine' and kicked up a row, 'While noticing that, neither the pharmaceutical company nor the government office did anything'.

It instigated and caused an appeal, 'Poor parents who were deprived of their children unreasonably.'

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare restricted Tamiflu's prescription unavoidably during the trial.

Many children died for it.

However, in the medical world the word thermal delirium is evident.

It is 'it is delirious from the heat' in other words easy.

Lose consciousness with high fever, many people have experience of staggering outside when you notice.

Because the judge is not stupid, the parent loses.

The Asahi Shimbun instigated a poor parent by unjust decision or jeer and brought it to the Supreme Court, but the result was the same.

There were bankruptcy plaintiffs who could no longer issue a stamp fee for final appeal.

Two years since the appeal was kicked out, the removal of a ban declaration of Tamiflu by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare shows that it was a deliberate misinformation of the Asahi Newspaper.

But the Asahi Shimbun's malice coverage is not only this.

At the same time as this lawsuit lung cancer specific medicine Iressa also campaigned phytotoxicity campaign to manipulate the patient bereaved, and the Asahi made them bring an action.

Iressa is a cancer treatment developed by a UK pharmaceutical company.

It aimed at so-called apoptotic effect which promotes suicide to non-normal cells such as cancer, but Caucasian has no medicinal effect.

So, it is an unapproved drug in Europe and the US, but somehow it worked for the Japanese.

Serious side effects were also within 1%.

The Japanese will do whites do not do.

Asahi hates that kind of thought of Japanese people,

It is 'approval too early',

It is 'unexpected dead and dead due to side effects',

It kicked up a row that it is unacceptable phytotoxicity,

Instigate the patient bereaved up to the Supreme Court, but the result it was also losing.

It is the manipulated foolish complainants that lose, being defeated only and there is not loss in the Asahi.

This draft continues.

referred to the necessity to reconsider the ideal way of the committee in the United Nations reform

The following is from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

Background of the comfort women 's UN committee, recommendations?

Committee's interest · Creed, Lead judgment

Q

What is the CERD of the United Nations?

A

Organization that established the establishment in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination that came into effect in 1969.

The Committee will review and make recommendations on the state of implementation of the Convention for each Member State.

Japan joined the treaty in 1995, and this time it is the fourth time to receive judgment and recommendation.

The recommendation has no binding force.

Q

How do members decide

A

There are 18 members, selected by treaty member countries. District allocation is considered in elections.

Last year from Japan, Professor Ko Keiko of Nanzan University (Nagoya City) was elected for the first time.

China and South Korea will also issue each one-person committee.

As a rule, the committee will not participate in discussion discussions of the country of origin.

Q

Why do recommendations on comfort women issue?

A

The committee takes duties with individual qualifications.

The national review under which the recommendation is based is a question-and-answer form by the committee and the government representative, so it is currently subject to great influence by the interests and beliefs of the committee members.

This time, actively made a remark by 鄭鎮星 committee from Korea was a co-representative of "The Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan (The Korean Council)" which supports former comfort women.

It is practically difficult for the committee to grasp actual conditions of over 170 treaty member countries, and the information collection largely depends on non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Q

The previous recommendation

A

The comfort women issue is not served in Japan's review to Japan until 2010, and the recommendation was first specified in 2014.

At this time, they requested ① trial of the person responsible for human rights violation ② apology for the former comfort women and their families - compensation.

The recommendation of this time urged the Government of Japan to proceed with the victim-centered ‘permanent settlement’ and report the correspondence to former comfort women to the committee.

For this reason, the comfort women problem will remain as an examination task.

Q

What is UN human rights diplomacy

A

Geneva has nine related committees for each human rights treaty, as well as the Human Rights Council consisting of Member States, as well as the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

 

Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga Yoshihide said at a news conference Thursday 31 that the United Nations' CERD recommended the Japanese Government ‘Permanent solution by victim - centered approach’ with the comfort women issue ‘It is extremely regrettable, not completely considering the description of the government’ which was a strong discontent.

Ambassador Okaniwa Ken of the Geneva International Organization Government Delegation also revealed that he has offered 'regret at' to executives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Office (OHCHR).

The delegation of the Government of Japan agreed that the comfort women issue is not covered by the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and that Japan and the ROK agreement on the comfort women issue in the year 2015.

Foreign Minister Taro Kono said at a press conference on Thursday, after criticizing the response of the committee, 'Is it necessary to reform to concentrate on discussions with mandate (authority) as a committee?', he pointed out so, and referred to the necessity to reconsider the ideal way of the committee in the United Nations reform.

Meanwhile, Korean media reported on the 31th, quoting the report of the committee.The Hankyore newspaper (electronic version) reported that the committee expressed concern also to the remarks of Japanese officials who are trying to minimize the responsibility of the Japanese government regarding the comfort women issue. "

(Makiko Takita, Seoul = Takahiro Nomura)

and the information collection largely depends on non-governmental organizations (NGOs)

The following is from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

Background of the comfort women 's UN committee, recommendations?

Committee's interest · Creed, Lead judgment

Q

What is the CERD of the United Nations?

A

Organization that established the establishment in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination that came into effect in 1969.

The Committee will review and make recommendations on the state of implementation of the Convention for each Member State.

Japan joined the treaty in 1995, and this time it is the fourth time to receive judgment and recommendation.

The recommendation has no binding force.

Q

How do members decide

A

There are 18 members, selected by treaty member countries. District allocation is considered in elections.

Last year from Japan, Professor Ko Keiko of Nanzan University (Nagoya City) was elected for the first time.

China and South Korea will also issue each one-person committee.

As a rule, the committee will not participate in discussion discussions of the country of origin.

Q

Why do recommendations on comfort women issue?

A

The committee takes duties with individual qualifications.

The national review under which the recommendation is based is a question-and-answer form by the committee and the government representative, so it is currently subject to great influence by the interests and beliefs of the committee members.

This time, actively made a remark by 鄭鎮星 committee from Korea was a co-representative of "The Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan (The Korean Council)" which supports former comfort women.

It is practically difficult for the committee to grasp actual conditions of over 170 treaty member countries, and the information collection largely depends on non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Q

The previous recommendation

A

The comfort women issue is not served in Japan's review to Japan until 2010, and the recommendation was first specified in 2014.

At this time, they requested ① trial of the person responsible for human rights violation ② apology for the former comfort women and their families - compensation.

The recommendation of this time urged the Government of Japan to proceed with the victim-centered ‘permanent settlement’ and report the correspondence to former comfort women to the committee.

For this reason, the comfort women problem will remain as an examination task.

Q

What is UN human rights diplomacy

A

Geneva has nine related committees for each human rights treaty, as well as the Human Rights Council consisting of Member States, as well as the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

 

Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga Yoshihide said at a news conference Thursday 31 that the United Nations' CERD recommended the Japanese Government ‘Permanent solution by victim - centered approach’ with the comfort women issue ‘It is extremely regrettable, not completely considering the description of the government’ which was a strong discontent.

Ambassador Okaniwa Ken of the Geneva International Organization Government Delegation also revealed that he has offered "regret at" to executives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Office (OHCHR).

The delegation of the Government of Japan agreed that the comfort women issue is not covered by the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and that Japan and the ROK agreement on the comfort women issue in the year 2015.

Foreign Minister Taro Kono said at a news conference Thursday 31 that criticizing the committee's response would point out that ‘Reform is necessary to concentrate on discussions with mandate (authority) as a committee’, it mentioned the necessity to review the way the committee should be in the reform of the United Nations. Meanwhile, Korean media reported on the 31th, quoting the report of the committee.

 

The Hankyore newspaper (electronic version) reported that the committee expressed concern also to the remarks of Japanese officials who are trying to minimize the responsibility of the Japanese government regarding the comfort women issue. "

(Makiko Takita, Seoul = Takahiro Nomura)

Background of the comfort women 's UN committee, recommendations?

The following is from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

Background of the comfort women 's UN committee, recommendations?

Committee's interest · Creed, Lead judgment

Q

What is the CERD of the United Nations?

A

Organization that established the establishment in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination that came into effect in 1969.

The Committee will review and make recommendations on the state of implementation of the Convention for each Member State.

Japan joined the treaty in 1995, and this time it is the fourth time to receive judgment and recommendation.

The recommendation has no binding force.

Q

How do members decide

A

There are 18 members, selected by treaty member countries. District allocation is considered in elections.

Last year from Japan, Professor Ko Keiko of Nanzan University (Nagoya City) was elected for the first time.

China and South Korea will also issue each one-person committee.

As a rule, the committee will not participate in discussion discussions of the country of origin.

Q

Why do recommendations on comfort women issue?

A

The committee takes duties with individual qualifications.

The national review under which the recommendation is based is a question-and-answer form by the committee and the government representative, so it is currently subject to great influence by the interests and beliefs of the committee members.

This time, actively made a remark by 鄭鎮星 committee from Korea was a co-representative of "The Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan (The Korean Council)" which supports former comfort women.

It is practically difficult for the committee to grasp actual conditions of over 170 treaty member countries, and the information collection largely depends on non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Q

The previous recommendation

A

The comfort women issue is not served in Japan's review to Japan until 2010, and the recommendation was first specified in 2014.

At this time, they requested ① trial of the person responsible for human rights violation ② apology for the former comfort women and their families - compensation.

The recommendation of this time urged the Government of Japan to proceed with the victim-centered ‘permanent settlement’ and report the correspondence to former comfort women to the committee.

For this reason, the comfort women problem will remain as an examination task.

Q

What is UN human rights diplomacy

A

Geneva has nine related committees for each human rights treaty, as well as the Human Rights Council consisting of Member States, as well as the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

 

Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga Yoshihide said at a news conference Thursday 31 that the United Nations' CERD recommended the Japanese Government ‘Permanent solution by victim - centered approach’ with the comfort women issue ‘It is extremely regrettable, not completely considering the description of the government’ which was a strong discontent.

Ambassador Okaniwa Ken of the Geneva International Organization Government Delegation also revealed that he has offered "regret at" to executives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Office (OHCHR).

The delegation of the Government of Japan agreed that the comfort women issue is not covered by the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and that Japan and the ROK agreement on the comfort women issue in the year 2015.

Foreign Minister Taro Kono said at a news conference Thursday 31 that criticizing the committee's response would point out that ‘Reform is necessary to concentrate on discussions with mandate (authority) as a committee’, it mentioned the necessity to review the way the committee should be in the reform of the United Nations. Meanwhile, Korean media reported on the 31th, quoting the report of the committee.

 

The Hankyore newspaper (electronic version) reported that the committee expressed concern also to the remarks of Japanese officials who are trying to minimize the responsibility of the Japanese government regarding the comfort women issue. "

(Makiko Takita, Seoul = Takahiro Nomura)

Japan and the US led the time to notice that there is no way to rectify the world besides making a

The following is also from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

It is an unexpected fact that Japan has been criticized as being a servile diplomacy of the United States, from the malicious peripheral nations and the leftist activists, and it is scattered.

A truly ridiculous recommendation like this time ... no recommendation to China etc. which is the world's largest and the worst human rights violation nation,

It is impossible to keep silent about the form of CERD that is no longer tolerable, repeatedly attacking repeatedly, targeting Japan.

We must suspend support right now in the UN budget that is spent on CERD.

Ultimately, Japan and the US led the time to notice that there is no way to rectify the world besides making a coalition of countries of true freedom and democracy, as well.

US suspension of Palestinian support

US paper news refugee definition change request

WASHINGTON - Hiroyuki Kano, The Washington Post reported on Thursday that the Trump regime decided to stop the contribution to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

It is expected to announce it within a few weeks, saying that neighboring countries are asking for a substitution.

The United States is the largest contributor to UNRWA, and in fact it is concerned that the deterioration of the situation in Gaza in Palestine Autonomous Region will cause further violence against Israel.

The U.S. government is calling for reforms such as the definition of refugees to be supported by UNRWA and the use of support money and excluding their descendants with only about 5 million Palestinian refugee status qualified as refugees at the time of Israel's founding in 1948 It is also a policy to encourage people to reduce it to less than 1/10.

According to the newspaper, the budget of UNRWA is $ 1.1 billion (about 122 billion yen), and the U.S. was burdened with this about 1/3.

The U.S. government has also decided to cancel the $ 200 million assistance targeting the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, separately. The Trump regime aims to respond to the Palestinian autonomous government's pressure to resume peace negotiations with Israel.

However, the Palestinian side has strongly repulsed because refugee definition change involves the problem of ‘returning right’.

We must suspend support only in the UN budget that is spent on CERD.

The following is also from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

It is an unexpected fact that Japan has been criticized as being a servile diplomacy of the United States, from the malicious peripheral nations and the leftist activists, and it is scattered.

A truly ridiculous recommendation like this time ... no recommendation to China etc. which is the world's largest and the worst human rights violation nation,

It is impossible to keep silent about the form of CERD that is no longer tolerable, repeatedly attacking repeatedly, targeting Japan.

We must suspend support only in the UN budget that is spent on CERD.

Ultimately, Japan and the US led the time to notice that there is no way to rectify the world besides making a coalition of countries of true freedom and democracy, as well.

US suspension of Palestinian support

US paper news refugee definition change request

WASHINGTON - Hiroyuki Kano, The Washington Post reported on Thursday that the Trump regime decided to stop the contribution to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

It is expected to announce it within a few weeks, saying that neighboring countries are asking for a substitution.

The United States is the largest contributor to UNRWA, and in fact it is concerned that the deterioration of the situation in Gaza in Palestine Autonomous Region will cause further violence against Israel.

The U.S. government is calling for reforms such as the definition of refugees to be supported by UNRWA and the use of support money and excluding their descendants with only about 5 million Palestinian refugee status qualified as refugees at the time of Israel's founding in 1948 It is also a policy to encourage people to reduce it to less than 1/10.

According to the newspaper, the budget of UNRWA is $ 1.1 billion (about 122 billion yen), and the U.S. was burdened with this about 1/3.

The U.S. government has also decided to cancel the $ 200 million assistance targeting the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, separately. The Trump regime aims to respond to the Palestinian autonomous government's pressure to resume peace negotiations with Israel.

However, the Palestinian side has strongly repulsed because refugee definition change involves the problem of ‘returning right’.

no recommendation to China etc. which is the world's largest and the worst human rights violation

The following is also from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

It is an unexpected fact that Japan has been criticized as being a servile diplomacy of the United States, from the malicious peripheral nations and the leftist activists, and it is scattered.

A truly ridiculous recommendation like this time ... no recommendation to China etc. which is the world's largest and the worst human rights violation nation,

It is impossible to keep silent about the form of CERD that is no longer tolerable, repeatedly attacking repeatedly, targeting Japan.

We must suspend support only in the UN budget that is spent on CERD.

Ultimately, Japan and the US led the time to notice that there is no way to rectify the world besides making a coalition of countries of true freedom and democracy, as well.

US suspension of Palestinian support

US paper news refugee definition change request

WASHINGTON - Hiroyuki Kano, The Washington Post reported on Thursday that the Trump regime decided to stop the contribution to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

It is expected to announce it within a few weeks, saying that neighboring countries are asking for a substitution.

The United States is the largest contributor to UNRWA, and in fact it is concerned that the deterioration of the situation in Gaza in Palestine Autonomous Region will cause further violence against Israel.

The U.S. government is calling for reforms such as the definition of refugees to be supported by UNRWA and the use of support money and excluding their descendants with only about 5 million Palestinian refugee status qualified as refugees at the time of Israel's founding in 1948 It is also a policy to encourage people to reduce it to less than 1/10.

According to the newspaper, the budget of UNRWA is $ 1.1 billion (about 122 billion yen), and the U.S. was burdened with this about 1/3.

The U.S. government has also decided to cancel the $ 200 million assistance targeting the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, separately. The Trump regime aims to respond to the Palestinian autonomous government's pressure to resume peace negotiations with Israel.

However, the Palestinian side has strongly repulsed because refugee definition change involves the problem of ‘returning right’.

A truly ridiculous recommendation like this time ... no recommendation to China etc. which is

The following is also from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

It is an unexpected fact that Japan has been criticized as being a servile diplomacy of the United States, from the malicious peripheral nations and the leftist activists, and it is scattered.

A truly ridiculous recommendation like this time ... no recommendation to China etc. which is the world's largest and the worst human rights violation nation,

It is impossible to keep silent about the form of CERD that is no longer tolerable, repeatedly attacking repeatedly, targeting Japan.

We must suspend support only in the UN budget that is spent on CERD.

Ultimately, Japan and the US led the time to notice that there is no way to rectify the world besides making a coalition of countries of true freedom and democracy, as well.

US suspension of Palestinian support

US paper news refugee definition change request

WASHINGTON - Hiroyuki Kano, The Washington Post reported on Thursday that the Trump regime decided to stop the contribution to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

It is expected to announce it within a few weeks, saying that neighboring countries are asking for a substitution.

The United States is the largest contributor to UNRWA, and in fact it is concerned that the deterioration of the situation in Gaza in Palestine Autonomous Region will cause further violence against Israel.

The U.S. government is calling for reforms such as the definition of refugees to be supported by UNRWA and the use of support money and excluding their descendants with only about 5 million Palestinian refugee status qualified as refugees at the time of Israel's founding in 1948 It is also a policy to encourage people to reduce it to less than 1/10.

According to the newspaper, the budget of UNRWA is $ 1.1 billion (about 122 billion yen), and the U.S. was burdened with this about 1/3.

The U.S. government has also decided to cancel the $ 200 million assistance targeting the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, separately. The Trump regime aims to respond to the Palestinian autonomous government's pressure to resume peace negotiations with Israel.

However, the Palestinian side has strongly repulsed because refugee definition change involves the problem of ‘returning right’.

 

It is extremely regrettable, not completely considering the description of the government

The following is from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

Background of the comfort women 's UN committee, recommendations?

Committee's interest · Creed, Lead judgment

Q

What is the CERD of the United Nations?

A

Organization that established the establishment in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination that came into effect in 1969.

The Committee will review and make recommendations on the state of implementation of the Convention for each Member State.

Japan joined the treaty in 1995, and this time it is the fourth time to receive judgment and recommendation.

The recommendation has no binding force.

Q

How do members decide

A

There are 18 members, selected by treaty member countries. District allocation is considered in elections.

Last year from Japan, Professor Ko Keiko of Nanzan University (Nagoya City) was elected for the first time.

China and South Korea will also issue each one-person committee.

As a rule, the committee will not participate in discussion discussions of the country of origin.

Q

Why do recommendations on comfort women issue?

A

The committee takes duties with individual qualifications.

The national review under which the recommendation is based is a question-and-answer form by the committee and the government representative, so it is currently subject to great influence by the interests and beliefs of the committee members.

This time, actively made a remark by 鄭鎮星 committee from Korea was a co-representative of "The Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan (The Korean Council)" which supports former comfort women.

It is practically difficult for the committee to grasp actual conditions of over 170 treaty member countries, and the information collection largely depends on non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Q

The previous recommendation

A

The comfort women issue is not served in Japan's review to Japan until 2010, and the recommendation was first specified in 2014.

At this time, they requested ① trial of the person responsible for human rights violation ② apology for the former comfort women and their families - compensation.

The recommendation of this time urged the Government of Japan to proceed with the victim-centered ‘permanent settlement’ and report the correspondence to former comfort women to the committee.

For this reason, the comfort women problem will remain as an examination task.

Q

What is UN human rights diplomacy

A

Geneva has nine related committees for each human rights treaty, as well as the Human Rights Council consisting of Member States, as well as the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

 

Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga Yoshihide said at a news conference Thursday 31 that the United Nations' CERD recommended the Japanese Government ‘Permanent solution by victim - centered approach’ with the comfort women issue ‘It is extremely regrettable, not completely considering the description of the government’ which was a strong discontent.

Ambassador Okaniwa Ken of the Geneva International Organization Government Delegation also revealed that he has offered "regret at" to executives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Office (OHCHR).

The delegation of the Government of Japan agreed that the comfort women issue is not covered by the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and that Japan and the ROK agreement on the comfort women issue in the year 2015.

Foreign Minister Taro Kono said at a news conference Thursday 31 that criticizing the committee's response would point out that ‘Reform is necessary to concentrate on discussions with mandate (authority) as a committee’, it mentioned the necessity to review the way the committee should be in the reform of the United Nations. Meanwhile, Korean media reported on the 31th, quoting the report of the committee.

 

The Hankyore newspaper (electronic version) reported that the committee expressed concern also to the remarks of Japanese officials who are trying to minimize the responsibility of the Japanese government regarding the comfort women issue. "

(Makiko Takita, Seoul = Takahiro Nomura)

This time, actively made a remark by Cheng Jinzun committee from Korea was a co-representative

The following is from 2 pages of yesterday's Sankei Shimbun.

Background of the comfort women 's UN committee, recommendations?

Committee's interest · Creed, Lead judgment

Q

What is the CERD of the United Nations?

A

Organization that established the establishment in the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination that came into effect in 1969.

The Committee will review and make recommendations on the state of implementation of the Convention for each Member State.

Japan joined the treaty in 1995, and this time it is the fourth time to receive judgment and recommendation.

The recommendation has no binding force.

Q

How do members decide

A

There are 18 members, selected by treaty member countries. District allocation is considered in elections.

Last year from Japan, Professor Ko Keiko of Nanzan University (Nagoya City) was elected for the first time.

China and South Korea will also issue each one-person committee.

As a rule, the committee will not participate in discussion discussions of the country of origin.

Q

Why do recommendations on comfort women issue?

A

The committee takes duties with individual qualifications.

The national review under which the recommendation is based is a question-and-answer form by the committee and the government representative, so it is currently subject to great influence by the interests and beliefs of the committee members.

This time, actively made a remark by Cheng Jinzun committee from Korea was a co-representative of "The Korean Council for the Women Drafted for Military Sexual Slavery by Japan (The Korean Council)" which supports former comfort women.

It is practically difficult for the committee to grasp actual conditions of over 170 treaty member countries, and the information collection largely depends on non-governmental organizations (NGOs).

Q

The previous recommendation

A

The comfort women issue is not served in Japan's review to Japan until 2010, and the recommendation was first specified in 2014.

At this time, they requested ① trial of the person responsible for human rights violation ② apology for the former comfort women and their families - compensation.

The recommendation of this time urged the Government of Japan to proceed with the victim-centered ‘permanent settlement’ and report the correspondence to former comfort women to the committee.

For this reason, the comfort women problem will remain as an examination task.

Q

What is UN human rights diplomacy

A

Geneva has nine related committees for each human rights treaty, as well as the Human Rights Council consisting of Member States, as well as the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

 

Chief Cabinet Secretary Suga Yoshihide said at a news conference Thursday 31 that the United Nations' CERD recommended the Japanese Government ‘Permanent solution by victim - centered approach’ with the comfort women issue ‘It is extremely regrettable, not completely considering the description of the government’ which was a strong discontent.

Ambassador Okaniwa Ken of the Geneva International Organization Government Delegation also revealed that he has offered "regret at" to executives of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Office (OHCHR).

The delegation of the Government of Japan agreed that the comfort women issue is not covered by the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and that Japan and the ROK agreement on the comfort women issue in the year 2015.

Foreign Minister Taro Kono said at a news conference Thursday 31 that criticizing the committee's response would point out that ‘Reform is necessary to concentrate on discussions with mandate (authority) as a committee’, it mentioned the necessity to review the way the committee should be in the reform of the United Nations. Meanwhile, Korean media reported on the 31th, quoting the report of the committee.

 

The Hankyore newspaper (electronic version) reported that the committee expressed concern also to the remarks of Japanese officials who are trying to minimize the responsibility of the Japanese government regarding the comfort women issue. "

(Makiko Takita, Seoul = Takahiro Nomura)

朝日がそれをまた薬害と煽って63人が国を提訴した。役所はしょうがない、接種をやめて様子見をしているがＨＰＶの方は

以下は前章の続きである。

次に朝日が踊らせたのが子宮頸がん（ＨＰＶ）ワクチンの後遺症患者だ。　

ＨＰＶは性風俗の乱れがひどい欧米で蔓延し、女性だけでなくオーラルセックスのせいで男性にも咽頭がんや肛門がんを引き起こし、ためにワクチン接種は男性にも施されている。　

日本でも近年、年間１万人が感染し3000人が死んでいることもあって政府は５年前から女子中学生を対象に定期接種を始めた。　

ところが「体格のいい米国子女用の極太注射針を使う」（日本精神科病院協会長、山崎學医師）ことから苦痛を訴える声が多かった。　

酷い場合は「歩けなくなった」女性も出てくる。

朝日がそれをまた薬害と煽って63人が国を提訴した。　

役所はしょうがない、接種をやめて様子見をしているがＨＰＶの方は待ってくれない。

すごい勢いで広がってこれからは確実に年間3000人を超える女性が死に、その何倍かが子供を産めない悲劇に見舞われることになる。　で、ふと思い出すのがエイズ（ＨＩＶ）だ。

原産はコンゴだがそこに国連ＰＫＯで出たハイチ兵が罹患し、それを持ち帰ってハイチ人の多くが感染した。　

そこに対岸の米国から小児性愛者や同性愛者が買春に来て、米国にＨＩＶを持ち帰った。　

今、公式ＨＩＶ感染源は１位「肛門性交」３位「注射針」に挟まれ、堂々の２位に「ハイチ人」が入る。　

国名が感染源とされる屈辱は耐え難い。　

朝日などを相手にしていたら「子宮頸がんの感染源第１位は日本人」の汚名を背負いかねない。