文明のターンテーブルThe Turntable of Civilization

日本の時間、世界の時間。
The time of Japan, the time of the world

leave it as ancient → medieval → modern → nowadays and

2018年09月05日 16時44分01秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient medieval modern nowadays and leave it others as ancient modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long

2018年09月05日 16時33分47秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and

2018年09月05日 16時32分09秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely

2018年09月05日 16時30分41秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

2018年09月05日 16時29分34秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

words,'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'

2018年09月05日 16時26分49秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time

2018年09月05日 16時24分41秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’ )

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long,

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, ancient → medieval → modern → nowadays and others as ancient → modern (or nowadays) deep.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification,

2018年09月05日 16時23分11秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification

2018年09月05日 16時21分47秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

Hegel, Marx 's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory

2018年09月05日 16時19分01秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

and it does not know the time of nature.

2018年09月05日 16時17分32秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work

2018年09月05日 16時16分16秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler

2018年09月05日 16時15分03秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times

2018年09月05日 16時14分06秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

What is written is the human deed

Human beings will notice a causal story in the middle of time from ancient times.

From here history books are beginning to be written by historians and chronicler.

Even if you write it chronologically, even if you write it to proceed it is all human beings' work, and it does not know the time of nature.

Hegel, Marx's ‘progress historical view’ was a lie, so I would like to introduce the theory of historian Hidehiro Okada, first, for the sake of advancing a new era classification.

"Well, then, we have to think about a practical age classification, which we mentioned briefly earlier, but in the end, the basis for human beings to think about time separately is ‘now’ and ‘once upon a time’. In addition, words, 'current' and 'past', in other words, it is a dichotomy of 'modern' and 'ancient'. Besides the dichotomy method, there is no practical era classification” (‘What is history?’)

What the genius says is extreme too much and I and so on cannot keep up absolutely.

Tentatively, Western Europe and Japan, where the independent lords industrialized the provinces and the history was long, the northern India where the clan Kingdom existed, leave it as ancient  medieval  modern  nowadays and leave it others as ancient  modern (or nowadays) it is.

America is only nowadays without ancestry, China is ancient → nowadays.

I think that people should think about variously because they do not like that.

That is why the modern day in Japan is over.

 

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする

そんなの嫌だという人にはいろいろと考えてもらえばよいと思う。そういうことで、日本の近代は終わった。

2018年09月05日 12時28分12秒 | 日記

以下は前章の続きである。

書いてあるのは人間の所業 

人類は太古からの時間の途中で因果ストーリーに気づくのである。

ここから歴史家や史官により歴史書が書かれ始める。

年表的に書いても、進歩するように書いてもそれは全部、人間の所業であり自然の時間はあずかり知らない。 

そこでヘーゲル、マルクスの「進歩史観」がウソだったので、便宜的に新しい時代区分を提唱しておきたい、まずは歴史学者、岡田英弘さんの論を紹介しよう。  

「さて、そうすると、実際的な時代区分というものを考えなければならない。すでに先ほど簡単に触れたが、結局、人間が時間を分けて考える基本は、『いま』と『むかし』、ということだ。これを言いかえれば、『現在』と『過去』、さらに言いかえれば、『現代』と『古代』、という二分法になる。二分法以外に、実際的な時代区分はありえない」(『歴史とは何か』) 

天才の言うことは過激すぎて、私などとてもついていけない。

一応、独立した領主が地方を産業化する歴史の長かった西欧と日本、藩王国のあった北インドなどは、古代→中世→近代→現代としておき、その他は古代→近代(あるいは現代)としておく。

アメリカは古代なしの現代だけ、中国は古代→現代である。

そんなの嫌だという人にはいろいろと考えてもらえばよいと思う。

そういうことで、日本の近代は終わった。

コメント
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする