文明のターンテーブルThe Turntable of Civilization

日本の時間、世界の時間。
The time of Japan, the time of the world

'Abe beating' is sure a company policy of Asahi newspaper.

2023年01月13日 13時12分13秒 | 全般
A man born in 1988 called Youtuber Kazuya's paper was published in the monthly magazine Sound Argument released today. (2017/12/30)
It is precisely correct.
I am emphasizing the sentence except for the headline.
I think
If you read the article 'Abe beating' is sure a company policy · · ·
The battle between the Asahi Shimbun and the conservative controversialist is overheating.
Asahi Shimbun has played a significant role (of course, in the wrong meaning) in historical problems, including the comfort women problem.
As for the media attitude of such Asahi Shimbun and past reports, the words of conservative controversialists are also sharp, but the Asahi Shimbun has recently sent various protest sentences as 'giving misunderstandings.'
Indeed, conservative controversialist seems to have too much expression.
On the other hand, it is understandable to fight to protect the company's honor.
However, even if you say whether you said Abe bashing is a company policy or not, it will only be a barren dispute with an argument that gets nowhere.
The problem of the Asahi Shimbun is that it has strange convincing power when said, 'Abe bashing is a company policy.'
If you look at the tone, it is obvious.
It seems that it is writing unnecessarily to defame the government and to hit it.
Governor Koike Fever got off to the Tokyo Assembly elections in July, and the LDP suffered a major historic defeat.
The Asahi Shimbun editorial on July 3 summarizes the city council written as follows.
[Tokyo Assembly elections ended in a historical LDP defeat. Undoubtedly, the expectation for the governor of Yuriko Koike has caused a big wind. However, it cannot explain the defeat of the LDP alone. 'NO' to the Pridefulness and conceit of the Abe administration, it has no choice but to presume that it is the judge of the voter.
When the LDP takes a defeat, it makes the utmost use when it is 'NO to the Abe administration.'
How was it in the House of Representatives election in October?
As is well known, the LDP won in a landslide, the Asahi in the October 23 editorial after the House of Representatives election [There is a big gap between the election results and the public opinion survey in the polls during the election campaign]
The Asahi does not admit the objective fact that LDP wins and writes something like sour grapes.
Is it not inconsistent?
If the LDP loses, 'No to the Abe administration'; if it wins, 'There is a gap in the public opinion' absolutely not appraised.
Where did the people's opinions go?

2023/1/12, at Kyoto
コメント    この記事についてブログを書く
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする
« Top 10 real-time searches 2... | トップ | これらの黒幕が朝日新聞社で... »
最新の画像もっと見る

コメントを投稿

ブログ作成者から承認されるまでコメントは反映されません。

全般」カテゴリの最新記事