It read "What a plant knows" in Asahi and it thought that it does "as expected".
After discovering Kyoto again and again 6 years before, especially, it continued to take a plant in Kyoto.
If representing, it goes to the year 50 times at the Kyoto arboretum and Tenryu temple.
It let's be possible to say that the plant and the birds which is respectively don't know Akutagawa about whom (The laughter).
Akutagawa is the photographer who takes instant.
It doesn't use art at all.
It sees hardly until the taken photograph, too, goes home and drops on the PC and is crowded.
It is because there were to see the screen which was crowded in the dropping and to be surprised many times.
“As for the plants, it must know a writer “There was to seem only so many times.
It is because of their by the welcomed photograph which it has no choice but to think of so which is seeing a writer many being.
The people who think that it is false should understand if it is possible for them to subscribe to the photograph collection of Akutagawa in the store on Amazon.
Especially, if it is possible to subscribe from the recent one, it should be possible to agree.
To do the becoming in the text of the black is Akutagawa.
“What a plant knows” written by Daniel ChamotVitz
Of plants person's approaching “It is seeing ".
Moreover, to have been torn is called “to store “in the leaf.
One of which the study results are based on the biologist about the sense of the plant which is developed above the imagination and it he explains
When a companion is bitten by the insect, it senses a smell in “sniffing” and there is a tree which lets out the chemicals which defend a body, too.
It is the human feelings that, when becoming, get to want to think of the existence of “the pain” and “the feelings” there *of* it.
Only, the author sticks a nail “because there is not suffering because the plants don’t have brain ".
The plant and we say that it and we ramified 2,000,000,000 years before and that it and we evolved.
To attempt to imagine what world the far, far " relative " sees and whether or not it feels, too, is pleasant.
( Yano Machiko translation, Kawade Shobo Shinsha 1680 yen )
After discovering Kyoto again and again 6 years before, especially, it continued to take a plant in Kyoto.
If representing, it goes to the year 50 times at the Kyoto arboretum and Tenryu temple.
It let's be possible to say that the plant and the birds which is respectively don't know Akutagawa about whom (The laughter).
Akutagawa is the photographer who takes instant.
It doesn't use art at all.
It sees hardly until the taken photograph, too, goes home and drops on the PC and is crowded.
It is because there were to see the screen which was crowded in the dropping and to be surprised many times.
“As for the plants, it must know a writer “There was to seem only so many times.
It is because of their by the welcomed photograph which it has no choice but to think of so which is seeing a writer many being.
The people who think that it is false should understand if it is possible for them to subscribe to the photograph collection of Akutagawa in the store on Amazon.
Especially, if it is possible to subscribe from the recent one, it should be possible to agree.
To do the becoming in the text of the black is Akutagawa.
“What a plant knows” written by Daniel ChamotVitz
Of plants person's approaching “It is seeing ".
Moreover, to have been torn is called “to store “in the leaf.
One of which the study results are based on the biologist about the sense of the plant which is developed above the imagination and it he explains
When a companion is bitten by the insect, it senses a smell in “sniffing” and there is a tree which lets out the chemicals which defend a body, too.
It is the human feelings that, when becoming, get to want to think of the existence of “the pain” and “the feelings” there *of* it.
Only, the author sticks a nail “because there is not suffering because the plants don’t have brain ".
The plant and we say that it and we ramified 2,000,000,000 years before and that it and we evolved.
To attempt to imagine what world the far, far " relative " sees and whether or not it feels, too, is pleasant.
( Yano Machiko translation, Kawade Shobo Shinsha 1680 yen )