The following is from the reading column of the Sankei Shimbun yesterday.
"Onaga governor and Okinawa media" Nakashinjyo Makoto (Sankei Shimbun publishing)
Mr. Nakashinjyo Makoto of author is speaking to Okinawa perefctural people.
"The inhabitant of a prefecture should change earlier than the media. It is because the media is the one which rides the tide of the public"
It may say resolutely leftist influence in 2 big paper "Ryukyu Shinpo" and "Okinawa times" at Okinawa.
When I see their way of Media bias and the words and deeds of Onaga Takeshi governor, I associate with that Communist Party of China, which doesn't permit free speech or doesn't stop the fabrication of the history, too.
The Communist Party of China expands fabricated history into the U.S. and to UNESCO of the United Nations in addition to China domestic and diminishes Japan.
Even if the Japanese side points out the mistake of the fact relevance at any cost, they don't mind.
It senses the anti-Japanese thought of the Communist Party of China and the consubstantiality to the Okinawa 2 big paper and Mr. Onaga.
Mr. Nakashinjyo drew the distortion of Okinawa in the speech space vividly by the polite coverage.
The aim of the anti- base exercise which the person expresses with "the script and enactment are Okinawa media, leading actor is Onaga governor" it is not all the Henoko moving prevention.
It says that it is a demilitarization and an independent theory at Okinawa under extreme pro-China line.
However, it is Nakayama Yoshitaka Ishigaki Mayor Okinawa as if to smash thick "Wall of Media bias" of Okinawa media which deviated from the basics of the journalism, criticizes Mr. Onaga and so on for being overt.
In the young generation of Okinawa, it isn't silent.
"In 11 cities at Okinawa, as for Onaga support, only two, remainder of the Mayor Nago and Naha all the member are the support of Nakaima Hirokazu former governor who approved Henoko reclamation"
Mr. Onaga went out to the board of directors of the United Nations human rights and Okinawa person complained of it to be oppressed by the government of Japan.
It denied the claim of the governor squarely in the board of directors of the human rights where the Nago citizen of 26 year-old, it Ms. Ganaha masako, too, are the same, and for the serious challenge by China, it emphasized it, saying the turning of eyes.
Against that they don't report even the Chinese threat, she formed the "the society of prefectural and national people to correct the 2 papers", it judged that the report of them drove prefectural people to the road of the misfortune and misery.
As Mr. Nakashinjyo called, prefectural people are changing.
The posture of the government which accelerates base return, too, pushes a change.
Can the Okinawa 2 big paper go about the change of this prefectural people consciousness or does it lose a reader?
If anything, the point I have an interest.
The comment: Yoshiko Sakurai