The following is the sequel of the preceding chapter.
Statement stressed is me.
Now, the US San'onofure nuclear power plants, steam generator Mitsubishi delivery has failed, and was forced to the decommissioning due to it, the United States side has sued Mitsubishi in PL method.
Same as Toyota's Lexus litigation, it's almost accusation litigation, but even if there was a problem with the Mitsubishi, it cannot be compared with the seriousness of the defect reactor of GE.
Yet why the TEPCO say whether did not recourse to GE, because nuclear liability law Article 4, "other than TEPCO operators such as are not the responsibility of the damages" prohibits the PL method is applied.
Nuclear power business at the time the US EXIM and, it what was relied on borrowings from GE.
This one term is said to have been inserted in the intention on the sides of the U.S. that should not be considered such as the PL method, even though it has already doing look troublesome.
The reason for GE has finished the Fukushima responsible for turned sailors also wonder at its side.
Or say thanks to GE's cutting corners, Japan became able to make an excellent nuclear power plant.
The exportation, too, is favorable.
The interview touches the present situation of that the nuclear power plant which is made in Japan is steadily exported to and Asahi Shimbun makes him say that "now, are you good".
The article which is nowhere in one piece of the truth.
Now, it overcomes well, here I want to hear with.
(August 1, 2013)