Looking at this, the scoop of the problem has been posted past zero midnight on the 17th

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Manager of the Asahi Newspaper who made a raid on the Sankei Shimbun Company

Hasegawa

I am a human being who has been in that for a long time, but there are still difficult to understand this time.

In the Asahi Shimbun, a house organ is published four times a year.

The autumn number came out in October, 2017 but the exchange immediately before the article of the morning edition with May 17th appear is written.

Looking at this, the scoop of the problem has been posted past zero midnight on the 17th.

Whether the desk of the social department (vice - director) on the evening, it is the desk of the interview team or the duty desk of the day, it is unknown, but the appropriate responsible desk is 'How about putting in this article tonight' it seems that there was some idea.

It seems that it is took the stand that will re-examine solidly to the reporter in the front line the next day, 'what to do if it is overtaken by another company', the form as it makes it think it that quite was exchange of the formula in the question with the reporter in the front line is done.

Indeed, at the late night of the day, at NHK's news, at a glance flowed too.

After all, the responsibility desk embarked.

However, there is no shadow of the social director there, and there is no shadow of department deputy who is the former editorial office.

In short, they handed it out to the make-up department at the discretion of the responsible desk.

Furthermore, a person in the position of a general desk saw it and said, ‘Let's go with this big article.’

The responsibility desk is writing a series of such happenings with its own note.

There may be some self-explanation there.

The basic responsibility is not himself, maybe he wanted to insinuate that was a general desk that made the final decision of handling (laugh).

This draft continues.

It seems that reporters, desks, and reviewers have a sense of such a sense of mind to

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Takayama

There is not an intention of one question’s checking a mistake.

It seems that reporters, desks, and reviewers have a sense of such a sense of mind to wake up some kind of movement.

In other words, there is a clear intention, the Asahi Shimbun is on the point of doing social reform,

They do not mind having a few doubts before the cause of defeating bad Abe.

The lie of the staff group fleeing from the Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. Fukushima, too,

The nuclear power plant is bad, so they assume that a few lies are OK before the cause of collapsing the nuclear power plant.

I wonder if I thought that the publication of this Ujioka manuscript was also such a thing.

I myself analyzed that ‘Asahi Shimbun is a socio-path (antisocial personality disorder)’ in the head column of ‘justice’ (February issue)’.

Psychopath is congenital, but sociopath is an acquired psychosis, ‘It is extremely narcissist, a person who is strongly conscious of being special’ is likely to be prone, ‘It has sympathy and loyalty only in groups that have the same ideas as themselves’ that is the symptom.

If the organization called Asahi Shimbun that it belongs to believes that ‘the Japanese army is bad’, it is a lie according to it,

For example, Matsui Yayori follows Yoshida Seiji 'The Japanese armored abducted Korean women in Busan and put them on warships and made them sexual slaves', even if she makes it up, there is no guilt at all.

Apart from whether or not this analysis is witnessed, there are signs of socio-paths rich in the Asahi Shimbun.

This draft continues.

There is no such persistence as possessed as such.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Takayama

Buddhist incantation using chanting and carnival - like religious celebrations that occurred across Japan from June 1867 to May 1868 In the event of a riot, certainly it spread all over the country.

However, it is easy for the Japanese to come to one's senses even if they get excited.

Certainly, it is the national character to return a shake to.

There is not bigotry like a witch hunt in the Europe, and so on.

Much more, it does not come to one's senses forever, getting into swing with everyone, taking to the neck of the president like Korean Peninsula.

There is no such persistence as possessed as such.

There are two doubts about the news report of the Asahi Newspaper. 

The desk sees the manuscript of which one became repeat but it was wrong, the revision sees and the reporter on duty, too, sees.

However, there is a report on 17th May written by Ujioka reporter that Mr. Hasegawa thought ‘That?’

Why did not the desk feel it?

What is the check function system of the Asahi Newspaper?

This is one question.

Hasegawa

As expected, do you think so?

This draft continues.

Because it was the main treatment tremendously in spite of being such an article

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Two questions

Takayama

The Ujioka reporter is the person of such a thought tendency originally, is not it?

Hasegawa

It seems that there was a major premise that this time Kake Gakuen news coverage from the beginning ‘It is a good subject for anti-Abe’.

I have read the Asahi Shimbun morning paper on May 17, 2017 many times over and over again, but the fact of supporting somewhat the fact that 'Prime Minister Abe distorted an original public administration, making shameful devious intervention a relation Ministry’, it is not written at all.

Because it was the main treatment tremendously in spite of being such an article, Kake riot began from there,

Becoming a big uproar, weekly magazine, television program, then Democratic Progressive Parties of Japan and the Communist Party of Japan were side by side and started Abe attack all at once.

If it says ‘following blindly’ this phenomenon, it is until then, ‘When one dog shakes, it barks at a hundred dogs’ = When one person tells a shivering thing, many people of the world make it a fuss about spreading it as the truth from one to the next = A sight like doing for real has appeared.

What on earth is this phenomenon?

Is it a weakness of Japanese society?

It must be said that it is a mysterious phenomenon.

This draft continues.

Such a thing is a paranoia historical view and cannot be formed as historical studies

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Hasegawa

Mr. Nagae Kiyoshi of previous Asahi Shimbun reporter who, too, has published a conversation book together before to belong to the general research headquarters of time, Asahi Shimbun.

The Nagae person examined the contents of the textbook of the history type of the elementary schools, and junior and senior high schools there in detail and wrote one paper.

In conclusion, ‘Is this OK in a textbook? It is too terrible contents.

The textbook seems to see things more comprehensive, multilateral, and full of facts.’

In short, I wrote a paper that extracted that Japanese historical textbooks are very biased.

That was published in the so-called institution magazine of the general research headquarters ‘Asahi Research Institute Report’.

It is the end of 2003.

Mr. Nagae delivered the CD containing the paper and related materials to the MEXT reporters club.

In that case, Ujioka reporter who was in the press club there with the education responsibility became fierce by seeing the thesis, accompanied with grief or with stuffing of some sort of Asahi newspaper's MEXT reporter club and came to the general research 'headquarters, it seems that she protested violently while shedding tears,' Even if it is a magazine for internal use, can I post such a paper? ', to the director there.

Ujioka reporter protests have heard that Nagae thesis seemed to be a violent denying all the results of Japanese history after the war, if it says.

However, what she says after war Japan's historical study is, in short, Marxism Class conflict historical view, consider Japan a sin historical view of the victorious country.

Such a thing is a paranoia historical view and cannot be formed as historical studies.

This draft continues.

At that time, we were indoctrinated as to be sure to take evidence.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter

Our newspaper reporter comes to the branch office and learns the ABC of work there.

At that time, we were indoctrinated as to be sure to take evidence.

Then, the person concerned who can meet directly for one by one to hit.

Argue for and against - Let's hear the story of both A and B if there are various opinions.

Listen and post them fairly.

This is the inviolable rule of the reporter who cannot shake by all means.

It was severely taught, saying 'do not write an article complacently'.

When thinking that this was properly as the newspaperman, the Kake report of Ujioka reporter appeared.

It is saying that that tried a government office and the person concerned but for Hasegawa to be pointed out, it comes to want to say 'you will be different' (The smiling wryly).

Without covering A of the pivot absolutely, why did you cover only B?

The desk checks ordinariness if such a strange manuscript appears.

Let it rewrites that Kato's opinion is not included.

However the desk overlooked reading and correcting or make-up department, it point out that it is strange.

However, it is not.

The halfway manuscript has become top of the page.

Including Yoshida Seiji report to have made a comfort woman problem, it is not absolutely thought of at this, in at least Sankei Shimbun.

This article continues.

People from all over the world who read my English translation, for example, people who thought that

Below is the journalist Takayama Masayuki published in this month's monthly magazine WiLL and journalist former Asahi Newspaper reporter Hasegawa Kiyoshi It was from the interview issue titled ‘Kake coverage, why the Asahi newspaper barked at lie’.

Japanese citizens did not read monthly magazines such as WiLL, HANADA, Voice, justice, but subscribed to newspapers such as Asahi Newspaper, Mainichi Newspaper, Tokyo Newspaper, and they were watching their TV station, their subsidiary and NHK reports etc. Then, you should be keenly aware that you do not know anything about the truth of things.

People from all over the world who read my English translation, for example, people who thought that the Asahi Shimbun was Japanese sense of conscience, should all be stunned knowing its actual condition.

Emphasis in sentences other than heading is me.

Asahi In-house newsletter Miscellaneous revealed ‘fake · scoop’ article and the interior of ‘disaster’

The main enemy of the Asahi Shimbun?

Takayama

Asahi Shimbun has complained about the column of ‘Weekly Shincho’.

I wrote the scene at the party leader debate sponsored by the Japanese press club Asahi's Tsuboi Yuzuru questioned self-importantly to Prime Minister Abe about Mori · Kake problem -

“Abe contradicted. The Asahi Shimbun only wrote in large letters about pervert undersecretary, omitted the remarks of Kato former Governor Ehime Prefecture. Tsuboi said in a high and mighty manner ‘No, I told it.’ That's a big lie. On the day's page, as many as 50 Yomiuri and Sankei reported Kato's remarks, the Asahi Shimbun and the Mainichi Shimbun had zero lines."

As opposed to it, the Asahi Shimbun reported not to this front page, but also the name of Kato's name on the page on the back of how many pages it turned. It is contrary to the fact.

What to say?

Body of the message is an essential requirement, ‘5 WIH’ in the incident article is the ABC of the writing in order to put it all together.

It only wrote a message from huge letters, and Kato's words that clearly deny it 'it put a little in the inner surface where no one sees', Well, ‘(it wrote both sides fairly) it will be alibi making’ which Prime Minister Abe said to Tsuboi guesses excellently.

Hasegawa

Surely, Asahi Shimbun did not take up at all in the general article about the remark of Mr. Kato.

Mr. Takayama wrote ‘the appearance to believe able to curse Abe’ also in the column of the monthly ‘justice’ (December issue), and the application form requesting correction from the Asahi newspaper has arrived.

The main enemy of Asahi Shimbun will not you Takayama surely or :-)

Reporter who does not take evidence

Takayama

No, I think that I am a good understanding person of the Asahi Newspaper (laugh).

Indeed, read Asahi Shimbun which no one reads until it leads to the page except the FrontPage, it surmises until why it does so.

The reader like this is not a common.

It said that it planned for Hasegawa to have new book 'the lie report - false charge Mori / Kake case and Asahi Shimbun' (the tentative title) let out in WAC and I read the first galley proof.

As for the coverage of the Ujioka Mayumi reporter who became the chance that the Kake problem report spreads in this at a breath, it writes carefully.

It is shown to in the form such as 'it lacks you, here'.

When I read this, I think that it is exactly the Mori - Kake problem structure itself.

It does not do surrounding coverage or evidence.

This draft continues.

テレビはどうかというと、テレビの報道記者は非常にレベルが低い。新聞が書くのに従っているだけで

今朝のNHK「おはよう日本」は、昨日私が日本国民全員に向けて発信した以下の章中の高山の言の正しさを見事に実証してもいたのである。

戦後の思想で「自虐史観」という言葉が使われます。

マッカーサー憲法前文に「政府が再び戦争の災禍をもたらさないように、ウォッチしなければならない」と規定しています。

国とは悪いことばかりする。

権力が再び暴走しないように新聞をはじめメディアがウォッチしろとマッカーサーはくり返し刷り込んだ。　

その権力監視の代表を自負したのが朝日とＮＨＫだった。

つい10年前に船橋洋一が「ジャーナリズム再興」を書いたけれども、そこにも「暴力装置を持った権力」と政府を規定しているわけです。　

つまり、ごく最近までそう朝日新聞は信じてきたのです。

その実態が欧米植民地政策に言う分割統治、日本では国家と国民を離反させる分割統治だったとまだ気が付いていないんですね。

メディアはまだＧＨＱの呪縛に掛かったままです。　

テレビはどうかというと、テレビの報道記者は非常にレベルが低い。

新聞が書くのに従っているだけで、そうか、国は悪い、首相も悪いのか。

それなら映像で彼らを罵り蔑むことが我々テレビの役割だと思い込んでいるわけです。　

昔、テレビのコメンテーターをしたことがあります。

フジテレビの番組だったのに、そのときの資料は朝日新聞の社説なんです。

これはＮＨＫに行っても同じだった。　

ＴＢＳでは田原総一朗の番組に出たことがあるんだけど（笑）、観ていると参考にしているのは朝日なんですね。

長谷川　

そうなんですか。

その歴然たる事実を、ただの一言も和久田は視聴者に告げなかったのである。

私はNHKの朝７時のニュースは殆ど観ないのだが、今日は、たまたま観ていた。

このニュースの女性司会者である和久田麻由子が東大卒業生で美人であると男性視聴者の間で喧伝されている事は知っていた。

小川栄太郎は伊達に大阪大学を卒業した頭脳の持ち主ではなく、その頭脳を日本国と日本国民のために発揮し続けている事は言及して来たとおりである。

一方、この和久田はどうか？

彼女は小川氏の全く正反対の人間で、朝日新聞から得ている情報と、これに準じているNHKの報道部を支配している連中…特に大越は一応、、彼女の先輩だから尚更だろう…の論説どおりの事を喋っているだけの、ちょっと見栄えの良い人形に過ぎないと言っても全く過言ではない。

それは今朝の報道を観ていた私が確信したことである。

NHKの偏向報道の酷さは筆舌に尽くしがたい。

子宮頸がんワクチンの接種を巡る経緯について、戦後の世界で唯一無二のジャーナリストである高山正之は、その本領を遺憾なく発揮して、私たちに驚愕の事実を教えてくれた。

去年までテレビ朝日の報道ステーションやTBSのNEWS23を観ていた私も含めて、日本中の大半の人たちは、この事の真相を全く知らなかった。

今朝のNHKの報道番組である「おはよう日本」は、この事についての真相の反対側…つまり朝日新聞の斎藤智子記者＝朝日新聞と信州大学の…教授と呼ぶのもおこがましいレベルの人間である池田修一などという日本国民のほぼ全員が知らないような人間二人が行った許されざる悪行の結果を、今日、この時点でもNHKは完全無視して、彼らが正しいかのような報道を行ったのである。

彼等のデタラメを医師としてジャーナリストとして指摘し、朝日新聞などからの徹底的な、…いわゆる市民団体等や韓国の反日団体等の常套手段である相手を社会的に葬ろうとする異常な抗議活動を受け続けてもひるまなかった村中璃子さんが、終に、世界の権威であるジョン・マドック賞を与えられたこと、

同時に英ネイチャー誌などの、この賞の主催者たちは、村中氏の正しい論文を迫害し続けた朝日新聞などの態様を暗に批判した。

その歴然たる事実を、ただの一言も和久田は視聴者に告げなかったのである。

もはや、これはれっきとした犯罪行為である。

和久田は東大を卒業しましたなどとはとても言えない、単なる受験優等生にしか過ぎない事、

もし東大が真に優秀な大学であると仮定すれば、彼女、および大越などは、東大の面汚し以外の何者でもないだろう。

NHKの報道部の偏向ぶりは、もはや日本国と日本国民に対する犯罪行為である事を実証していたのである。

東京地検特捜部は、即刻、NHKの捜索に入り、関係者を検挙すべきだろう。

ゼネコンの談合などという問題よりも、遥に重大な、日本国と日本国民に対する犯罪なのだから。

以下は昨日の検索数ベスト50である。

順位	ページ名
1	辻元清美は森友問題の当事者だから大人しくしているけれど、彼女が売り出したのも予算委で「総理、総理」を
2	朝日の読者のほうは目隠しされてしまっているんです。
3	Но общественные
4	It is a very easy job for Asahi Shimbun who was strongest authority in the media world
5	内心「見たい」と思っていたものが、「見えた」ような錯覚に陥ったんじゃないか。
6	それから、前川文書とあいまって新聞、テレビ、週刊誌……などが雪崩を打ったように安倍疑惑報道をやり
7	この民主党政権によって、朝日、テレビ、評論家の言っていることは、いかにひどいかがよくわかった
8	Julkisten organisaatioiden ei kuitenkaan pitäisi tunnustaa väärää historiaa.
9	Aber öffentliche Organisationen sollten keine falsche Geschichte zulassen.
10	Ma le organizzazioni pubbliche non dovrebbero ammettere la falsa storia.
11	但公共机构不应该承认错误的历史。
12	しかし、テレビ界の朝日新聞盲従の体質は改まらなかった。
13	とにかく朝日は権威に胡坐をかいて記者道を外れていった。それこそ中国派の広岡知男（元朝日新聞社長）と
14	Pero las organizaciones públicas no deberían admitir una historia falsa.
15	Tetapi organisasi awam tidak boleh mengakui sejarah palsu.
16	地方紙になると、まだ共同通信があるから朝日系列に入っている。
17	フジテレビの番組だったのに、そのときの資料は朝日新聞の社説なんです。これはＮＨＫに行っても同じだった。
18	Mas as organizações públicas não devem admitir falsas histórias.
19	以下は昨日の検索数ベスト1～43である。
20	今も多少あるとすれば、これはメディアとしての自尊心が各紙誌、テレビなどにないとしか思えません。
21	그러나 공공 기관은
22	Tuttavia, ancora nei paesi stranieri e in loro, è necessario dire.
23	At that time, they began the big publicity of the ridiculous philosophy such as
24	以下は昨日の検索数ベスト45～50である。
25	Men offentlige organisationer bør ikke indrømme falsk historie.
26	Mais les organisations publiques ne devraient pas admettre une fausse histoire.
27	氏岡記者は、もともとそういう思想傾向の人なんですね。
28	En bref, la guerre historique
29	Die Verzerrung der Tatsache ist klar.
30	たとえば吉田清治に倣って松井やよりが「日本軍は釜山でも朝鮮女性を拉致し軍艦に乗せて性奴隷にした」
31	小川栄太郎氏は伊達に大阪大学を卒業した頭脳を持っているわけではないから、
32	อย่างไรก็ตามยั
33	In breve, la guerra storica è manovra politica, ingannando i "metodi ingannevoli" (Sun Tzu)
34	Cependant, toujours dans les pays étrangers et dans eux, il faut dire.
35	La distorsión del hecho es clara.
36	Men offentliga organisationer bör inte erkänna falsk historia.
37	Tapi organisasi publik seharusnya tidak mengakui sejarah palsu.
38	Jedoch, noch in den fremden Ländern und in ihnen, muss man sagen.
39	Namun, masih di negara asing dan di dalamnya, perlu dikatakan.
40	La distorsion du fait est claire.
41	なぜ、デスクはそれを感じなかったのか。朝日のチェック機能体制はどうなっているのか。これが一つの疑問です。
42	La distorsione del fatto è chiara.
43	Em suma, a guerra histórica
44	แต่องค์กรภาค
45	No entanto, ainda nos países estrangeiros e neles, é necessário dizer.
46	일본의 시위
47	慰安婦問題をでっち上げた吉田清治報道も含めて、こんなこと、少なくとも産経新聞ではとても考えられない
48	Короче говоря
49	Bagaimanapun, masih di negara asing dan di dalamnya, perlu dikatakan.
50	Однако, все