文明のターンテーブルThe Turntable of Civilization

日本の時間、世界の時間。
The time of Japan, the time of the world

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with

2018年07月17日 16時28分53秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.


However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by

2018年07月17日 16時26分44秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.


At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

2018年07月17日 16時25分32秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.


World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee

2018年07月17日 16時24分31秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.


The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

2018年07月17日 16時23分00秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.


The idea of trying to avoid war with Japan from the outset was not at all in Roosevelt.

2018年07月17日 15時21分18秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Roosevelt disingenuous treatment

Nakanishi

Similarly, as the leftist progressive view of history historian says, 'Since the Roosevelt regime was friendly to socialist policies like the new Deal policy, it is a kind of sympathy for socialism led to indulgent of correspondence to Stalin', the view that it is is also wrong.

Originally Roosevelt's behavior was not moral integrity at all, trying to carry out policies according to one principle and philosophy besides American hegemony.

On August 9, 1941, Roosevelt, who had a secret talk with Churchill on the Atlantic Ocean, had already clearly entered the Second World War, ‘(UK and US) Both countries do not seek expansion of the territory (in this war)’, ‘I do not want a territorial change that does not match the hope that the people concerned freely express freely (ethnic self-determination) it itself announced the ‘Atlantic Charter’ which is a propaganda like a declaration for war purpose.

At the same time, Japanese Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro had proposed a Japan-U.S. Summit with Roosevelt through the US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Clark Grew to avoid the Japan-US War.

However, America procrastinated the answer in to be not altogether hopeless manner and kicked out Konoe's offer.

It was talking with Churchill over the last Atlantic meeting. Including this one case, in the entire Japan-U.S. Negotiations in 1941, the United States repeated diplomatic correspondences that could be said to be very dishonest and almost deceptive to Japan.

And it stuck at the end of the phrase is ‘Hull note’ of that high-pressure ultimatum.

I wonder why Japanese historians do not point out the disingenuous treatment of Roosevelt to Japan after the war.

Watanabe Currently, I am advancing the translation of Professor Charles Callan Tansill of Georgetown University's History Department ‘Back Door to War’ (‘Participating in war from the back door. Roosevelt diplomacy identity 1933-1941’ This fall, scheduled to be rolled out from Soshisha).

According to this document, Prime Minister Konoe made the condition ‘Do not talk to the media’ when he requested the meeting to Roosevelt, the Roosevelt government leaked the meeting request.

Konoe wanted to negotiate carefully so that domestic strong opposition to the United States would not be understood.

If his movements 'come to light', he is sure of his own stall.

It can only think that it was intention to crush the Japan-U.S. Summit meeting that leaked this.

Nakanishi

In the United States, the process of the series of Japan-US negotiations from the spring of 1941 to the ‘Hull note’ itself was a ‘fake’, a fraud strategy to earn the preparation time for opening the war against Japan.

The idea of trying to avoid war with Japan from the outset was not at all in Roosevelt.

This draft continues.


And it stuck at the end of the phrase is ‘Hull note’ of that high-pressure ultimatum.

2018年07月17日 15時20分18秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Roosevelt disingenuous treatment

Nakanishi

Similarly, as the leftist progressive view of history historian says, 'Since the Roosevelt regime was friendly to socialist policies like the new Deal policy, it is a kind of sympathy for socialism led to indulgent of correspondence to Stalin', the view that it is is also wrong.

Originally Roosevelt's behavior was not moral integrity at all, trying to carry out policies according to one principle and philosophy besides American hegemony.

On August 9, 1941, Roosevelt, who had a secret talk with Churchill on the Atlantic Ocean, had already clearly entered the Second World War, ‘(UK and US) Both countries do not seek expansion of the territory (in this war)’, ‘I do not want a territorial change that does not match the hope that the people concerned freely express freely (ethnic self-determination) it itself announced the ‘Atlantic Charter’ which is a propaganda like a declaration for war purpose.

At the same time, Japanese Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro had proposed a Japan-U.S. Summit with Roosevelt through the US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Clark Grew to avoid the Japan-US War.

However, America procrastinated the answer in to be not altogether hopeless manner and kicked out Konoe's offer.

It was talking with Churchill over the last Atlantic meeting. Including this one case, in the entire Japan-U.S. Negotiations in 1941, the United States repeated diplomatic correspondences that could be said to be very dishonest and almost deceptive to Japan.

And it stuck at the end of the phrase is ‘Hull note’ of that high-pressure ultimatum.

I wonder why Japanese historians do not point out the disingenuous treatment of Roosevelt to Japan after the war.

Watanabe Currently, I am advancing the translation of Professor Charles Callan Tansill of Georgetown University's History Department ‘Back Door to War’ (‘Participating in war from the back door. Roosevelt diplomacy identity 1933-1941’ This fall, scheduled to be rolled out from Soshisha).

According to this document, Prime Minister Konoe made the condition ‘Do not talk to the media’ when he requested the meeting to Roosevelt, the Roosevelt government leaked the meeting request.

Konoe wanted to negotiate carefully so that domestic strong opposition to the United States would not be understood.

If his movements 'come to light', he is sure of his own stall.

It can only think that it was intention to crush the Japan-U.S. Summit meeting that leaked this.

Nakanishi

In the United States, the process of the series of Japan-US negotiations from the spring of 1941 to the ‘Hull note’ itself was a ‘fake’, a fraud strategy to earn the preparation time for opening the war against Japan.

The idea of trying to avoid war with Japan from the outset was not at all in Roosevelt.

This draft continues.


diplomatic correspondences that could be said to be very dishonest and almost deceptive to Japan

2018年07月17日 15時18分27秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Roosevelt disingenuous treatment

Nakanishi

Similarly, as the leftist progressive view of history historian says, 'Since the Roosevelt regime was friendly to socialist policies like the new Deal policy, it is a kind of sympathy for socialism led to indulgent of correspondence to Stalin', the view that it is is also wrong.

Originally Roosevelt's behavior was not moral integrity at all, trying to carry out policies according to one principle and philosophy besides American hegemony.

On August 9, 1941, Roosevelt, who had a secret talk with Churchill on the Atlantic Ocean, had already clearly entered the Second World War, ‘(UK and US) Both countries do not seek expansion of the territory (in this war)’, ‘I do not want a territorial change that does not match the hope that the people concerned freely express freely (ethnic self-determination) it itself announced the ‘Atlantic Charter’ which is a propaganda like a declaration for war purpose.

At the same time, Japanese Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro had proposed a Japan-U.S. Summit with Roosevelt through the US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Clark Grew to avoid the Japan-US War.

However, America procrastinated the answer in to be not altogether hopeless manner and kicked out Konoe's offer.

It was talking with Churchill over the last Atlantic meeting. Including this one case, in the entire Japan-U.S. Negotiations in 1941, the United States repeated diplomatic correspondences that could be said to be very dishonest and almost deceptive to Japan.

And It stuck at the end of the phrase is ‘Hull note’ of that high-pressure ultimatum.

I wonder why Japanese historians do not point out the disingenuous treatment of Roosevelt to Japan after the war.

Watanabe Currently, I am advancing the translation of Professor Charles Callan Tansill of Georgetown University's History Department ‘Back Door to War’ (‘Participating in war from the back door. Roosevelt diplomacy identity 1933-1941’ This fall, scheduled to be rolled out from Soshisha).

According to this document, Prime Minister Konoe made the condition ‘Do not talk to the media’ when he requested the meeting to Roosevelt, the Roosevelt government leaked the meeting request.

Konoe wanted to negotiate carefully so that domestic strong opposition to the United States would not be understood.

If his movements 'come to light', he is sure of his own stall.

It can only think that it was intention to crush the Japan-U.S. Summit meeting that leaked this.

Nakanishi

In the United States, the process of the series of Japan-US negotiations from the spring of 1941 to the ‘Hull note’ itself was a ‘fake’, a fraud strategy to earn the preparation time for opening the war against Japan.

The idea of trying to avoid war with Japan from the outset was not at all in Roosevelt.

This draft continues.


I wonder why Japanese historians do not point out the disingenuous treatment of Roosevelt

2018年07月17日 15時17分01秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Roosevelt disingenuous treatment

Nakanishi

Similarly, as the leftist progressive view of history historian says, 'Since the Roosevelt regime was friendly to socialist policies like the new Deal policy, it is a kind of sympathy for socialism led to indulgent of correspondence to Stalin', the view that it is is also wrong.

Originally Roosevelt's behavior was not moral integrity at all, trying to carry out policies according to one principle and philosophy besides American hegemony.

On August 9, 1941, Roosevelt, who had a secret talk with Churchill on the Atlantic Ocean, had already clearly entered the Second World War, ‘(UK and US) Both countries do not seek expansion of the territory (in this war)’, ‘I do not want a territorial change that does not match the hope that the people concerned freely express freely (ethnic self-determination) it itself announced the ‘Atlantic Charter’ which is a propaganda like a declaration for war purpose.

At the same time, Japanese Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro had proposed a Japan-U.S. Summit with Roosevelt through the US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Clark Grew to avoid the Japan-US War.

However, America procrastinated the answer in to be not altogether hopeless manner and kicked out Konoe's offer.

It was talking with Churchill over the last Atlantic meeting. Including this one case, in the entire Japan-U.S. Negotiations in 1941, the United States repeated diplomatic correspondences that could be said to be very dishonest and almost deceptive to Japan.

And I stuck at the end of the phrase is ‘Hull note’ of that high-pressure ultimatum.

I wonder why Japanese historians do not point out the disingenuous treatment of Roosevelt to Japan after the war.

Watanabe Currently, I am advancing the translation of Professor Charles Callan Tansill of Georgetown University's History Department ‘Back Door to War’ (‘Participating in war from the back door. Roosevelt diplomacy identity 1933-1941’ This fall, scheduled to be rolled out from Soshisha).

According to this document, Prime Minister Konoe made the condition ‘Do not talk to the media’ when he requested the meeting to Roosevelt, the Roosevelt government leaked the meeting request.

Konoe wanted to negotiate carefully so that domestic strong opposition to the United States would not be understood.

If his movements 'come to light', he is sure of his own stall.

It can only think that it was intention to crush the Japan-U.S. Summit meeting that leaked this.

Nakanishi

In the United States, the process of the series of Japan-US negotiations from the spring of 1941 to the ‘Hull note’ itself was a ‘fake’, a fraud strategy to earn the preparation time for opening the war against Japan.

The idea of trying to avoid war with Japan from the outset was not at all in Roosevelt.

This draft continues.


Originally Roosevelt's behavior was not moral integrity at all, trying to carry out policies

2018年07月17日 15時14分47秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Roosevelt disingenuous treatment

Nakanishi

Similarly, as the leftist progressive view of history historian says, 'Since the Roosevelt regime was friendly to socialist policies like the new Deal policy, it is a kind of sympathy for socialism led to indulgent of correspondence to Stalin', the view that it is is also wrong.

Originally Roosevelt's behavior was not moral integrity at all, trying to carry out policies according to one principle and philosophy besides American hegemony.

On August 9, 1941, Roosevelt, who had a secret talk with Churchill on the Atlantic Ocean, had already clearly entered the Second World War, ‘(UK and US) Both countries do not seek expansion of the territory (in this war)’, ‘I do not want a territorial change that does not match the hope that the people concerned freely express freely (ethnic self-determination) it itself announced the ‘Atlantic Charter’ which is a propaganda like a declaration for war purpose.

At the same time, Japanese Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro had proposed a Japan-U.S. Summit with Roosevelt through the US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Clark Grew to avoid the Japan-US War.

However, America procrastinated the answer in to be not altogether hopeless manner and kicked out Konoe's offer.

It was talking with Churchill over the last Atlantic meeting. Including this one case, in the entire Japan-U.S. Negotiations in 1941, the United States repeated diplomatic correspondences that could be said to be very dishonest and almost deceptive to Japan.

And I stuck at the end of the phrase is ‘Hull note’ of that high-pressure ultimatum.

I do not wonder why Japanese historians do not point out the disingenuous treatment of Roosevelt to Japan after the war.

Watanabe Currently, I am advancing the translation of Professor Charles Callan Tansill of Georgetown University's History Department ‘Back Door to War’ (‘Participating in war from the back door. Roosevelt diplomacy identity 1933-1941’ This fall, scheduled to be rolled out from Soshisha).

According to this document, Prime Minister Konoe made the condition ‘Do not talk to the media’ when he requested the meeting to Roosevelt, the Roosevelt government leaked the meeting request.

Konoe wanted to negotiate carefully so that domestic strong opposition to the United States would not be understood.

If his movements 'come to light', he is sure of his own stall.

It can only think that it was intention to crush the Japan-U.S. Summit meeting that leaked this.

Nakanishi

In the United States, the process of the series of Japan-US negotiations from the spring of 1941 to the ‘Hull note’ itself was a ‘fake’, a fraud strategy to earn the preparation time for opening the war against Japan.

The idea of trying to avoid war with Japan from the outset was not at all in Roosevelt.

This draft continues.


Since the Roosevelt regime was friendly to socialist policies like the new Deal policy, it is a

2018年07月17日 15時13分12秒 | 日記

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Roosevelt disingenuous treatment

Nakanishi

Similarly, as the leftist progressive view of history historian says, 'Since the Roosevelt regime was friendly to socialist policies like the new Deal policy, it is a kind of sympathy for socialism led to indulgent of correspondence to Stalin', the view that it is is also wrong.

Originally Roosevelt's behavior was not moral integrity at all, trying to carry out policies according to one principle and philosophy besides American hegemony.

On August 9, 1941, Roosevelt, who had a secret talk with Churchill on the Atlantic Ocean, had already clearly entered the Second World War, ‘(UK and US) Both countries do not seek expansion of the territory (in this war)’, ‘I do not want a territorial change that does not match the hope that the people concerned freely express freely (ethnic self-determination) it itself announced the ‘Atlantic Charter’ which is a propaganda like a declaration for war purpose.

At the same time, Japanese Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro had proposed a Japan-U.S. Summit with Roosevelt through the US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Clark Grew to avoid the Japan-US War.

However, America procrastinated the answer in to be not altogether hopeless manner and kicked out Konoe's offer.

It was talking with Churchill over the last Atlantic meeting. Including this one case, in the entire Japan-U.S. Negotiations in 1941, the United States repeated diplomatic correspondences that could be said to be very dishonest and almost deceptive to Japan.

And I stuck at the end of the phrase is ‘Hull note’ of that high-pressure ultimatum.

I do not wonder why Japanese historians do not point out the disingenuous treatment of Roosevelt to Japan after the war.

Watanabe Currently, I am advancing the translation of Professor Charles Callan Tansill of Georgetown University's History Department ‘Back Door to War’ (‘Participating in war from the back door. Roosevelt diplomacy identity 1933-1941’ This fall, scheduled to be rolled out from Soshisha).

According to this document, Prime Minister Konoe made the condition ‘Do not talk to the media’ when he requested the meeting to Roosevelt, the Roosevelt government leaked the meeting request.

Konoe wanted to negotiate carefully so that domestic strong opposition to the United States would not be understood.

If his movements 'come to light', he is sure of his own stall.

It can only think that it was intention to crush the Japan-U.S. Summit meeting that leaked this.

Nakanishi

In the United States, the process of the series of Japan-US negotiations from the spring of 1941 to the ‘Hull note’ itself was a ‘fake’, a fraud strategy to earn the preparation time for opening the war against Japan.

The idea of trying to avoid war with Japan from the outset was not at all in Roosevelt.

This draft continues.


Then, how can you explain Roosevelt's concessions to Stalin until unusual in the Yalta talks?

2018年07月17日 14時31分38秒 | 日記

The following is a monthly magazine that Japanese citizens must read: Voice This month's issue is titled ‘Yalta's Injustice Now Right, the Cause of Today's Asian Turmoil’, it is from the featured interview of Terumasa Nakanishi (Kyoto University Emeritus Professor) and Souki Watanabe (Japanese, Modern Contemporary History).

It is a special feature to be read by all Japanese including students studying history and people all over the world.

Stupid with Stalin 'roll in the hay'

Watanabe

In February 1945, a meeting with Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, J. Stalin on the Crimean Peninsula Yalta of the Soviet territory was held with three big boys (Yalta talks).

As a secret agreement, ‘Soviet putting German prisoners into forced labor’ and ‘Kuril Islands and South Sakhalin, ceding of various interests in Manchuria to the Soviet Union’ were exchanged.

The content of the secret agreement was revealed to the American people in February 1946 of the following year, and the New York World - Telegram paper criticized the government as follows.

"The United States has done something like catching Russia with a bribe to make it participate in the fight against Jap, it was totally unnecessary, was there such a meaningless bribe so far?"  

Regarding injustice of the Yalta conflict, indeed Prime Minister Churchill was well understood.

About half a year after the end of the war in February 1946, just before the closing announcement, in the public electricity addressed by the UK Ministry of Foreign Affairs to all the diplomatic missions, the signature which promised relocation of the Japanese territory including the President Roosevelt's Kuril Islands and the Northern Territories to the Soviet Union is beyond the presidential powers of the United States, under the circumstances where the US Congress has not ratified this agreement, the Yalta Agreement It shows a deep doubt about the effectiveness of.

In other words, the British government had doubts about the legal effectiveness of the Yalta conflict from the beginning.

But as Churchill knew about it and signed it without even informing the cabinet of his country to facilitate its relationship with Roosevelt, it could be said that there was a huge problem in moral terms both in the US and the UK.

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, Churchill et al. In the UK begin to embrace serious concerns about the fall of the British Empire.

One of the trends born out of it was ‘Anglo-Saxonism’ that is trying to embrace the United States and maintain the hegemony of Britain. But that was also the process by which the British Empire was absorbed by Pax Americana (American dominance).

In other words, it can be said that the British Empire that tried to successfully incorporate the United States was destroyed by the United States conversely because it was going for wool and coming home shorn, it is a world historical significance in the two great wars of the 20th century.

And I think that the Yalta meeting was just the last historical moment of ‘UK sunset’.

Watanabe

In March 1946, about a year after the Yalta talks, Churchill said in the ‘Iron Curtain’ speech, ‘Western Democratic State, especially the United Kingdom and the United States, We must suppress the movement of the Soviet Unlimitedly Continually Spreading Power and Thought’ As I mentioned, from conservative British conspirators who knew what the result of ‘roll in the hay’ with Stalin might have come from before the great war, I thought ‘Did you notice around this time ?, stupid bastard’ It must be (laugh).

Nakanishi

Roosevelt called Joseph Stalin, familiarly, ‘Uncle Joe’.

However, this is only a direction to appeal American friends with friendship with the Soviet Union,

However, this is only a direction to appeal American citizens with friendship with the Soviet Union, the American rulers never sold the alert to the Soviets.

Then, how can you explain Roosevelt's concessions to Stalin until unusual in the Yalta talks?

Sometimes I see the tone of Japan's conservative argument that ‘Roosevelt was brainwashed by communists’, but things are not that simple.

Although I was not as well educated as Churchill and Stalin, I think that the ability of Roosevelt was also first-rate as a strategist, such as skill to promote participation in World War II aiming at the world hegemony of the United States.

Watanabe

In the first place Roosevelt has no evidence of reading Communism related books.

Perhaps he has never looked at the basic literature of Marx or Lenin.

Although he is uneducated, we cannot help but think that 'it is a result it is a leading strategist', it is the difficulty of interpreting Roosevelt.

Nakanishi

It was rather the wife Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt who was nicknamed ‘Red First Ready’ who was reading enthusiastically about Communism-related books.

Watanabe

I am presuming that it is that there was confidence or overestimation which can manipulate Stalin at will to Roosevelt.

In November - December 1943, Roosevelt stayed at the Soviet Embassy during the Tehran meeting where the three biggest US, UK and U.S. gathered as Yalta talks gathered.

According to a paper with the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), at that time the conversation in the embassy was completely eavesdropped and how Roosevelt's judgment was dangerous and stupid in terms of security.

Roosevelt exposed the information within the administration to the Soviets as if it were ‘exposure frenzy.’

But that's why I cannot take the view that Roosevelt was being manipulated by Stalin's Communal Spy.

Conversely, as a Roosevelt, it may be that he was going to be manipulating the Soviets by letting out confidential information.

Is not it because he believed that he was a strategically advantageous position he was as unwary as possible against Stalin?

Will he without has been guarded against as that to Stalin because it believed that he was a favorable position tactically?

Nakanishi

After all, the aim of Roosevelt is to crush the British Empire, America is to grab the hegemony of the world, Japan and Soviets were just pieces for that.

And this aim was half successful and the United States became the world hegemon after the great war.

It can be said that the Cold War was a cost for that.

Japan captured successfully but in Soviet, will the U. S. be said to be unexpectedly had a hard time?

In that sense, it is still wrong that Roosevelt was manipulated by the Soviets.

This draft continues. 


Japan captured successfully but in Soviet, will the U. S. be said to be unexpectedly had a hard

2018年07月17日 14時30分08秒 | 日記

The following is a monthly magazine that Japanese citizens must read: Voice This month's issue is titled ‘Yalta's Injustice Now Right, the Cause of Today's Asian Turmoil’, it is from the featured interview of Terumasa Nakanishi (Kyoto University Emeritus Professor) and Souki Watanabe (Japanese, Modern Contemporary History).

It is a special feature to be read by all Japanese including students studying history and people all over the world.

Stupid with Stalin 'roll in the hay'

Watanabe

In February 1945, a meeting with Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, J. Stalin on the Crimean Peninsula Yalta of the Soviet territory was held with three big boys (Yalta talks).

As a secret agreement, ‘Soviet putting German prisoners into forced labor’ and ‘Kuril Islands and South Sakhalin, ceding of various interests in Manchuria to the Soviet Union’ were exchanged.

The content of the secret agreement was revealed to the American people in February 1946 of the following year, and the New York World - Telegram paper criticized the government as follows.

"The United States has done something like catching Russia with a bribe to make it participate in the fight against Jap, it was totally unnecessary, was there such a meaningless bribe so far?"  

Regarding injustice of the Yalta conflict, indeed Prime Minister Churchill was well understood.

About half a year after the end of the war in February 1946, just before the closing announcement, in the public electricity addressed by the UK Ministry of Foreign Affairs to all the diplomatic missions, the signature which promised relocation of the Japanese territory including the President Roosevelt's Kuril Islands and the Northern Territories to the Soviet Union is beyond the presidential powers of the United States, under the circumstances where the US Congress has not ratified this agreement, the Yalta Agreement It shows a deep doubt about the effectiveness of.

In other words, the British government had doubts about the legal effectiveness of the Yalta conflict from the beginning.

But as Churchill knew about it and signed it without even informing the cabinet of his country to facilitate its relationship with Roosevelt, it could be said that there was a huge problem in moral terms both in the US and the UK.

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, Churchill et al. In the UK begin to embrace serious concerns about the fall of the British Empire.

One of the trends born out of it was ‘Anglo-Saxonism’ that is trying to embrace the United States and maintain the hegemony of Britain. But that was also the process by which the British Empire was absorbed by Pax Americana (American dominance).

In other words, it can be said that the British Empire that tried to successfully incorporate the United States was destroyed by the United States conversely because it was going for wool and coming home shorn, it is a world historical significance in the two great wars of the 20th century.

And I think that the Yalta meeting was just the last historical moment of ‘UK sunset’.

Watanabe

In March 1946, about a year after the Yalta talks, Churchill said in the ‘Iron Curtain’ speech, ‘Western Democratic State, especially the United Kingdom and the United States, We must suppress the movement of the Soviet Unlimitedly Continually Spreading Power and Thought’ As I mentioned, from conservative British conspirators who knew what the result of ‘roll in the hay’ with Stalin might have come from before the great war, I thought ‘Did you notice around this time ?, stupid bastard’ It must be (laugh).

Nakanishi

Roosevelt called Joseph Stalin, familiarly, ‘Uncle Joe’.

However, this is only a direction to appeal American friends with friendship with the Soviet Union,

However, this is only a direction to appeal American citizens with friendship with the Soviet Union, the American rulers never sold the alert to the Soviets.

Then, how can you explain Roosevelt's concessions to Stalin until unusual in the Yalta talks?

Sometimes I see the tone of Japan's conservative argument that ‘Roosevelt was brainwashed by communists’, but things are not that simple.

Although I was not as well educated as Churchill and Stalin, I think that the ability of Roosevelt was also first-rate as a strategist, such as skill to promote participation in World War II aiming at the world hegemony of the United States.

Watanabe

In the first place Roosevelt has no evidence of reading Communism related books.

Perhaps he has never looked at the basic literature of Marx or Lenin.

Although he is uneducated, we cannot help but think that 'it is a result it is a leading strategist', it is the difficulty of interpreting Roosevelt.

Nakanishi

It was rather the wife Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt who was nicknamed ‘Red First Ready’ who was reading enthusiastically about Communism-related books.

Watanabe

I am presuming that it is that there was confidence or overestimation which can manipulate Stalin at will to Roosevelt.

In November - December 1943, Roosevelt stayed at the Soviet Embassy during the Tehran meeting where the three biggest US, UK and U.S. gathered as Yalta talks gathered.

According to a paper with the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), at that time the conversation in the embassy was completely eavesdropped and how Roosevelt's judgment was dangerous and stupid in terms of security.

Roosevelt exposed the information within the administration to the Soviets as if it were ‘exposure frenzy.’

But that's why I cannot take the view that Roosevelt was being manipulated by Stalin's Communal Spy.

Conversely, as a Roosevelt, it may be that he was going to be manipulating the Soviets by letting out confidential information.

Is not it because he believed that he was a strategically advantageous position he was as unwary as possible against Stalin?

Will he without has been guarded against as that to Stalin because it believed that he was a favorable position tactically?

Nakanishi

After all, the aim of Roosevelt is to crush the British Empire, America is to grab the hegemony of the world, Japan and Soviets were just pieces for that.

And this aim was half successful and the United States became the world hegemon after the great war.

It can be said that the Cold War was a cost for that.

Japan captured successfully but in Soviet, will the U. S. be said to be unexpectedly had a hard time?

In that sense, it is still wrong that Roosevelt was manipulated by the Soviets.

This draft continues. 


About half a year after the end of the war in February 1946, just before the closing announcement

2018年07月17日 14時28分31秒 | 日記

The following is a monthly magazine that Japanese citizens must read: Voice This month's issue is titled ‘Yalta's Injustice Now Right, the Cause of Today's Asian Turmoil’, it is from the featured interview of Terumasa Nakanishi (Kyoto University Emeritus Professor) and Souki Watanabe (Japanese, Modern Contemporary History).

It is a special feature to be read by all Japanese including students studying history and people all over the world.

Stupid with Stalin 'roll in the hay'

Watanabe

In February 1945, a meeting with Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, J. Stalin on the Crimean Peninsula Yalta of the Soviet territory was held with three big boys (Yalta talks).

As a secret agreement, ‘Soviet putting German prisoners into forced labor’ and ‘Kuril Islands and South Sakhalin, ceding of various interests in Manchuria to the Soviet Union’ were exchanged.

The content of the secret agreement was revealed to the American people in February 1946 of the following year, and the New York World - Telegram paper criticized the government as follows.

"The United States has done something like catching Russia with a bribe to make it participate in the fight against Jap, it was totally unnecessary, was there such a meaningless bribe so far?"  

Regarding injustice of the Yalta conflict, indeed Prime Minister Churchill was well understood.

About half a year after the end of the war in February 1946, just before the closing announcement, in the public electricity addressed by the UK Ministry of Foreign Affairs to all the diplomatic missions, the signature which promised relocation of the Japanese territory including the President Roosevelt's Kuril Islands and the Northern Territories to the Soviet Union is beyond the presidential powers of the United States, under the circumstances where the US Congress has not ratified this agreement, the Yalta Agreement It shows a deep doubt about the effectiveness of.

In other words, the British government had doubts about the legal effectiveness of the Yalta conflict from the beginning.

But as Churchill knew about it and signed it without even informing the cabinet of his country to facilitate its relationship with Roosevelt, it could be said that there was a huge problem in moral terms both in the US and the UK.

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, Churchill et al. In the UK begin to embrace serious concerns about the fall of the British Empire.

One of the trends born out of it was ‘Anglo-Saxonism’ that is trying to embrace the United States and maintain the hegemony of Britain. But that was also the process by which the British Empire was absorbed by Pax Americana (American dominance).

In other words, it can be said that the British Empire that tried to successfully incorporate the United States was destroyed by the United States conversely because it was going for wool and coming home shorn, it is a world historical significance in the two great wars of the 20th century.

And I think that the Yalta meeting was just the last historical moment of ‘UK sunset’.

Watanabe

In March 1946, about a year after the Yalta talks, Churchill said in the ‘Iron Curtain’ speech, ‘Western Democratic State, especially the United Kingdom and the United States, We must suppress the movement of the Soviet Unlimitedly Continually Spreading Power and Thought’ As I mentioned, from conservative British conspirators who knew what the result of ‘roll in the hay’ with Stalin might have come from before the great war, I thought ‘Did you notice around this time ?, stupid bastard’ It must be (laugh).

Nakanishi

Roosevelt called Joseph Stalin, familiarly, ‘Uncle Joe’.

However, this is only a direction to appeal American friends with friendship with the Soviet Union,

However, this is only a direction to appeal American citizens with friendship with the Soviet Union, the American rulers never sold the alert to the Soviets.

Then, how can you explain Roosevelt's concessions to Stalin until unusual in the Yalta talks?

Sometimes I see the tone of Japan's conservative argument that ‘Roosevelt was brainwashed by communists’, but things are not that simple.

Although I was not as well educated as Churchill and Stalin, I think that the ability of Roosevelt was also first-rate as a strategist, such as skill to promote participation in World War II aiming at the world hegemony of the United States.

Watanabe

In the first place Roosevelt has no evidence of reading Communism related books.

Perhaps he has never looked at the basic literature of Marx or Lenin.

Although he is uneducated, we cannot help but think that 'it is a result it is a leading strategist', it is the difficulty of interpreting Roosevelt.

Nakanishi

It was rather the wife Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt who was nicknamed ‘Red First Ready’ who was reading enthusiastically about Communism-related books.

Watanabe

I am presuming that it is that there was confidence or overestimation which can manipulate Stalin at will to Roosevelt.

In November - December 1943, Roosevelt stayed at the Soviet Embassy during the Tehran meeting where the three biggest US, UK and U.S. gathered as Yalta talks gathered.

According to a paper with the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), at that time the conversation in the embassy was completely eavesdropped and how Roosevelt's judgment was dangerous and stupid in terms of security.

Roosevelt exposed the information within the administration to the Soviets as if it were ‘exposure frenzy.’

But that's why I cannot take the view that Roosevelt was being manipulated by Stalin's Communal Spy.

Conversely, as a Roosevelt, it may be that he was going to be manipulating the Soviets by letting out confidential information.

Is not it because he believed that he was a strategically advantageous position he was as unwary as possible against Stalin?

Will he without has been guarded against as that to Stalin because it believed that he was a favorable position tactically?

Nakanishi

After all, the aim of Roosevelt is to crush the British Empire, America is to grab the hegemony of the world, Japan and Soviets were just pieces for that.

And this aim was half successful and the United States became the world hegemon after the great war.

It can be said that the Cold War was a cost for that.

Japan captured successfully but in Soviet, will the U. S. be said to be unexpectedly had a hard time?

In that sense, it is still wrong that Roosevelt was manipulated by the Soviets.

This draft continues. 


The United States has done something like catching Russia with a bribe to make it participate in

2018年07月17日 14時24分48秒 | 日記

The following is a monthly magazine that Japanese citizens must read: Voice This month's issue is titled ‘Yalta's Injustice Now Right, the Cause of Today's Asian Turmoil’, it is from the featured interview of Terumasa Nakanishi (Kyoto University Emeritus Professor) and Souki Watanabe (Japanese, Modern Contemporary History).

It is a special feature to be read by all Japanese including students studying history and people all over the world.

Stupid with Stalin 'roll in the hay'

Watanabe

In February 1945, a meeting with Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, J. Stalin on the Crimean Peninsula Yalta of the Soviet territory was held with three big boys (Yalta talks).

As a secret agreement, ‘Soviet putting German prisoners into forced labor’ and ‘Kuril Islands and South Sakhalin, ceding of various interests in Manchuria to the Soviet Union’ were exchanged.

The content of the secret agreement was revealed to the American people in February 1946 of the following year, and the New York World - Telegram paper criticized the government as follows.

"The United States has done something like catching Russia with a bribe to make it participate in the fight against Jap, it was totally unnecessary, was there such a meaningless bribe so far?"  

Regarding injustice of the Yalta conflict, indeed Prime Minister Churchill was well understood.

In the public electricity addressed by the UK Ministry of Foreign Affairs to all the diplomatic missions

About half a year after the end of the war in February 1946, just before the closing announcement,

In the public electricity addressed by the UK Ministry of Foreign Affairs to all the diplomatic missions,

The signature which promised relocation of the Japanese territory including the President Roosevelt's Kuril Islands and the Northern Territories to the Soviet Union is beyond the presidential powers of the United States, under the circumstances where the US Congress has not ratified this agreement, the Yalta Agreement It shows a deep doubt about the effectiveness of.

In other words, the British government had doubts about the legal effectiveness of the Yalta conflict from the beginning.

But as Churchill knew about it and signed it without even informing the cabinet of his country to facilitate its relationship with Roosevelt, it could be said that there was a huge problem in moral terms both in the US and the UK.

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, Churchill et al. In the UK begin to embrace serious concerns about the fall of the British Empire.

One of the trends born out of it was ‘Anglo-Saxonism’ that is trying to embrace the United States and maintain the hegemony of Britain. But that was also the process by which the British Empire was absorbed by Pax Americana (American dominance).

In other words, it can be said that the British Empire that tried to successfully incorporate the United States was destroyed by the United States conversely because it was going for wool and coming home shorn, it is a world historical significance in the two great wars of the 20th century.

And I think that the Yalta meeting was just the last historical moment of ‘UK sunset’.

Watanabe

In March 1946, about a year after the Yalta talks, Churchill said in the ‘Iron Curtain’ speech, ‘Western Democratic State, especially the United Kingdom and the United States, We must suppress the movement of the Soviet Unlimitedly Continually Spreading Power and Thought’ As I mentioned, from conservative British conspirators who knew what the result of ‘roll in the hay’ with Stalin might have come from before the great war, I thought ‘Did you notice around this time ?, stupid bastard’ It must be (laugh).

Nakanishi

Roosevelt called Joseph Stalin, familiarly, ‘Uncle Joe’.

However, this is only a direction to appeal American friends with friendship with the Soviet Union,

However, this is only a direction to appeal American citizens with friendship with the Soviet Union, the American rulers never sold the alert to the Soviets.

Then, how can you explain Roosevelt's concessions to Stalin until unusual in the Yalta talks?

Sometimes I see the tone of Japan's conservative argument that ‘Roosevelt was brainwashed by communists’, but things are not that simple.

Although I was not as well educated as Churchill and Stalin, I think that the ability of Roosevelt was also first-rate as a strategist, such as skill to promote participation in World War II aiming at the world hegemony of the United States.

Watanabe

In the first place Roosevelt has no evidence of reading Communism related books.

Perhaps he has never looked at the basic literature of Marx or Lenin.

Although he is uneducated, we cannot help but think that 'it is a result it is a leading strategist', it is the difficulty of interpreting Roosevelt.

Nakanishi

It was rather the wife Mrs. Eleanor Roosevelt who was nicknamed ‘Red First Ready’ who was reading enthusiastically about Communism-related books.

Watanabe

I am presuming that it is that there was confidence or overestimation which can manipulate Stalin at will to Roosevelt.

In November - December 1943, Roosevelt stayed at the Soviet Embassy during the Tehran meeting where the three biggest US, UK and U.S. gathered as Yalta talks gathered.

According to a paper with the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), at that time the conversation in the embassy was completely eavesdropped and how Roosevelt's judgment was dangerous and stupid in terms of security.

Roosevelt exposed the information within the administration to the Soviets as if it were ‘exposure frenzy.’

But that's why I cannot take the view that Roosevelt was being manipulated by Stalin's Communal Spy.

Conversely, as a Roosevelt, it may be that he was going to be manipulating the Soviets by letting out confidential information.

Is not it because he believed that he was a strategically advantageous position he was as unwary as possible against Stalin?

Will he without has been guarded against as that to Stalin because it believed that he was a favorable position tactically?

Nakanishi

After all, the aim of Roosevelt is to crush the British Empire, America is to grab the hegemony of the world, Japan and Soviets were just pieces for that.

And this aim was half successful and the United States became the world hegemon after the great war.

It can be said that the Cold War was a cost for that.

Japan captured successfully but in Soviet, will the U. S. be said to be unexpectedly had a hard time?

In that sense, it is still wrong that Roosevelt was manipulated by the Soviets.

This draft continues.